Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IWW

Channel

IWW

@wobbliechannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,363subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001184692987
TypeChannel
Username@wobbliechannel
Created6 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wobbliechannel

Growth

1,3621,3681,3656 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,366 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,365 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,362 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,363 subscribers1,3636 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,361–1,369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:061,363+1
12 Aug 2026, 11:241,362-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:511,365-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:411,366-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:481,368no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:461,368first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 1,363 subscribers
Avg views / post
188
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held19 (31 March 202631 July 2026)
Views total375
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎8046.8%
3621.1%
💯2212.9%
👍2011.7%
🔥42.34%
🥰42.34%
21.17%
👏21.17%
🤝10.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/jXftSx867T0 I didn't know that Oliver Larkin was a Professional cook

3

21 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC251 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

HEY LIBS IF BEING A PREDATER IS A CRIME THEN YOULL HAVE TO LOCK UP THE HOLE REPUBLICAN PARTY !!

5🥰4

16 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC294 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @r_iww

I and other Fellow Workers did a podcast on the IWW, give it a listen! https://omny.fm/shows/it-could-happen-here/how-to-fire-your-boss?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGng-i2G4xBzJ6ozjBIlPdoAgcz48vUU3Ip9GaEjyiOtr9ypfmqvf7Zy70gMOA_aem_cyLdg1rbdbLRgUF84hGIgQ https://redd.it/1uxeq2x @r_iww

4

9 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC391 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ancaps are cucks even in their own fantasies

💯131

8 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC325 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/eANtVdIVSmk Give some love to this emerging YouTube left content creator!!!

3

4 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC431 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Thank you Fox News for giving free DSA advertising

14

20 Jun 2026, 19:31 UTC470 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @r_iww

A Critical Survey of Left Unionisms: McAlevey, Burns, Moody, Syndicalism, Permeationism, and Relationship-Based Organizing https://classautonomy.info/a-critical-survey-of-left-unionisms-mcalevey-burns-moody-syndicalism-permeationism-and-relationship-based-organizing/ https://redd.it/1u8vkai @r_iww

👍1

4 Jun 2026, 23:49 UTC575 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Every time the workers get too angry and start organizing wildcat strikes or occupying the factory floor, the union steps in to 'negotiate' a 2% wage increase and slightly better dental, making it look like a hard-fought class victory. ✊ But really, they're just defusing the revolution so the CEO gets to keep their golden parachute and the shareholders stay happy. 📈 The workers think the union is fighting the power,

💯52

4 Jun 2026, 23:45 UTC469 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Unions and employers are actually best friends. 🤝 But the union has to pretend to hate the bosses and go on strike in order to protect the bosses, so the workers don’t replace the union with a more radical, direct-action syndicate that actually wants to seize the means of production. "

2💯1

9 May 2026, 15:12 UTC638 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Dear Wobblies! FAU is hosting another 2-day Organiser Training 101 in English with the IWW (UK and Germany), from 09:00-17:00, Saturday 6 June to Sunday 7 June. The OT101 is an intensive training that will give you what you need to build an organising committee at your workplace. Based on the solidarity unionism framework, this training provides tools, tactics, and strategies to help you build solidarity with your co

👍21

29 Apr 2026, 16:32 UTC509 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @r_iwwPhoto

One Ring vs. One Big Union https://redd.it/1sy3aqq @r_iww

👍1

5 Apr 2026, 12:09 UTC725 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎨 Release: Energy workers Industrial union 220 🔹 Does this design represent your Department? 🔹 What would you add, remove, or change? 🔹 Is there symbolism missing that matters to your work? 💬 Write your thoughts in the comments! Feedback helps make these resources better for everyone.

👎7👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wobbliechannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 542,221 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IWW” (@wobbliechannel), 1,363 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wobbliechannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.