Channel
@wndtn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14,003subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001778051783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wndtn |
| Description | № 5016124066 Игрок, nxname сотрудничество: t.me/winderton |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wndtn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 14,003 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 14,008 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 14,021 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 14,022 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 14,024 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 14,027 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 14,029 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (11 January 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,010 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFK1PU3K | 1 | 8 July 2026 | 8 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Я тут в метро услышал как тип сказал, "Я изучаю нейронные сети", и судя по контексту, я так понял чел не про градиентный спуск, веса и кучу математики глаголил. Объясните мне, а то я видимо тупой. Что они там изучают?)
Повторение - мать учения vs "Кристофор Колумб" Лет 10 назад я узнал о Кейси Муратори, у него тогда еще и видосов-то толком не было, все они ощущались на вес золота и каждая мысль казалась че-то гениальным. Одна из них звучала так, примерная цитата, "Я пишу эту фичу Х уже 25ый раз, и каждый раз узнаю что-то новое". И вот эта идея тогда как-то особенно сильно врезалась мне в сознание, что я будь-то-бы сделал её частью…
А не пора ли отдохнуть? На Выходном от Selectel 👀 25 июля соберёмся в Эрарте, чтобы разобраться, как ИИ меняет найм, работу с командой и карьерное развитие. Обсудим: ↗️ Как привлекать сильных специалистов и оценивать компетенции в эпоху искусственного интеллекта? ↗️ Почему ИИ-агент работает эффективно для личных задач, а на уровне команды — не всегда? ↗️ Где естественный интеллект никогда не уступит искусственному?…
Немного новостей: - Последние месяцы я стараюсь больше фокусироваться на кодинге. Тестировал разные способы как себя можно развлечь, то есть не просто "что-то писать", а именно разные интерактивные тулзы. К сожалению, не могу тут ничего просто так упомянуть, потому что реклама, но те кто знают - те знают. Офк все пытаюсь делать с "no ai policy", но иногда приходится че-то попромптить само собой.... Лично у меня всегд…
Здарова гайз. Давно не было контента, причины тому дела + лень + тот самый видос, о котором сейчас будут писать в коментах. Но я вернулся на регулярный выход снова. Сделал вам отдыхательный видос, все как надо. Если у тебя руки еще не отсохли, то можешь поставить лайк. Как лето ощущается? я на улице пока только 1 раз был. https://youtu.be/rGNwsuQRFHQ
- У вас есть идея проекта. - У вас есть год времени. - У вас есть достаточно денег.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Канал Winderton дарит вам Telegram Premium.
Ок тогда скоро новый вид
Photo, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @wndtn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
- У вас есть идея проекта. - У вас есть год времени. - У вас есть достаточно денег.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Winderton” (@wndtn), 14,003 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wndtn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.