Channel
@wmagxk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,260subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002168086604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wmagxk |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wmagxk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 5,260 | -34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 5,294 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 5,297 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 July 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 66,370 |
| Reactions total | 5,528 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,528 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5251476149409716621 | 1,834 | 33.2% | |
| custom 5222299878222238374 | 971 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5456428969412818912 | 658 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5390853176809261810 | 513 | 9.28% | |
| custom 5402381302823418046 | 442 | 8.00% | |
| custom 5287347037661065845 | 391 | 7.07% | |
| custom 5253449394824455086 | 336 | 6.08% | |
| custom 5283208999880127651 | 270 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5222294715671547633 | 113 | 2.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,528reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wmagxk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы можете оставить этот канал как архив для себя. Он не будет удалятся (во всяком случае, если тг сам его не уничтожит). Не забывайте подписываться на канал омежки: @kxgamw_res Канал альфочки (на случай, если омежку снова отлупит по попе тг): @miskarisaa 👓 💖 🐤
custom 5287347037661065845281custom 540238130282341804651custom 545642896941281891241custom 52222998782222383747custom 52514761494097166214
Тот кто не подпишется на новый канал, тот будет НАВЕЧНО изгнан из клуба омег. @kxgamw_res Альфа 🌟
custom 5251476149409716621238custom 522229471567154763348custom 522229987822223837432custom 54023813028234180461
Всем. Подписаться. Иначе.
custom 5222299878222238374279custom 539085317680926181049custom 528320899988012765142custom 52514761494097166213
На всякий случай - @kxgamw_res Я не знаю слетит ли этот канал или нет, я завела Соне резерв, подпишитесь, чтоб не потеряться. Если что потом Соня решит, что делать со вторым каналом 🫣
custom 5251476149409716621240custom 522229987822223837467custom 522229471567154763352custom 525344939482445508610custom 52873470376610658454custom 53908531768092618101custom 54023813028234180461
Дорогие жители омежьего царства, к сожалению комментарии на этом канале, канал Омежки Квокки и второй канал Сони недоступны по неизвестной причине. Ждите, скоро Соня придет и разберется 🍿 Миса 😳
custom 5222299878222238374294custom 540238130282341804674custom 525344939482445508660custom 525147614940971662124custom 52873470376610658456custom 52832089998801276514custom 52222947156715476333
Мне иногда так смешно, когда спрашиваешь «сколько пальцев?», а в ответ слышишь «чебуреки»… 🌟
custom 5251476149409716621174custom 522229987822223837444custom 525344939482445508630custom 52873470376610658458custom 52832089998801276513
соц опрос:🌟 1. Кто вы в омегавёрсе? Альфа? Бета? Омежка? Домино или пассивчик? 2. Запах ваших феромонов? 3. Ваш перс из скз? (да, мы в вирте). 4* по вашему мнению кто альфочка/омежка/бета в паре Сосисони и Мисыриса? И какие у нас феромоны? 🐤👓
custom 5251476149409716621202custom 525344939482445508645custom 528734703766106584526custom 53908531768092618107custom 52222947156715476333custom 52222998782222383742custom 52832089998801276512
Наш альфочка 🌟
custom 5456428969412818912255custom 540238130282341804652custom 525344939482445508637custom 525147614940971662110custom 52222947156715476335custom 52222998782222383742
Я все выходные вот так вот провалялась 🌟 А ведь думала, что вот как сяду рисовать… Как ультану!!!! 🍿 хз… нужен какой-нибудь допинг….
custom 5456428969412818912280custom 528320899988012765158custom 525344939482445508642custom 525147614940971662111custom 52222998782222383743
Я останусь при своем мнении, что финальный результат Стэйси всё равно неудачный 🌟
custom 5251476149409716621177custom 528320899988012765134custom 528734703766106584526custom 539085317680926181013custom 54023813028234180461
на скетче Стейси выглядит куда лучше… хз в чем проблема… наверное в том что она голубая? Иммено такого оттенка? Хз
custom 5390853176809261810220custom 525344939482445508653custom 545642896941281891227custom 525147614940971662111
Эскизы для Стэйси… Минхо….. 🐰 что за дом лол… АХХАХАХ я так и думала что Хан Джисон нарисует какого-то жука 🎀 в его стиле… Брутальная омежка Липопинка с кроликом… 🌟 мне нравится… Ну из всех Стэйси больше всего похожа на эскиз Хваника 🤩 Зато для чана мы пикма в какошнике 🍿 ооо дааа тип мы жёны Чана…
custom 5251476149409716621230custom 528320899988012765147custom 539085317680926181033custom 522229987822223837412custom 54564289694128189122
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @wmagxk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,083,950 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“омежка переехала” (@wmagxk), 5,260 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wmagxk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.