rndm
💘4

Channel
@witthhlovee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002393536790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @witthhlovee |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 6 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/witthhlovee |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 3 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 4 | -122 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 126 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 56 | 45.9% | |
| custom 4909003879657505894 | 23 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5199407045404542455 | 21 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5343655751128726570 | 13 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5202044894058661006 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| custom 5809769117036581702 | 4 | 3.28% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
rndm
💘4
🤍
💘4
когда-нибудь я начну активно вести канал😇
💘5
Когда Ретт был рядом, она ничего не боялась: ни пожаров, ни взрывов, ни янки. М.М. «Унесённые ветром»
💘8
просто
💘8
🤍
💘5
Чак Басс летал в Париж только для того, чтобы привезти Блэр ее любимое печенье, голосовал за неё на выпускном 150 раз, чтобы сбылась её мечта стать королевой бала.
custom 49090038796575058946custom 53436557511287265706custom 51994070454045424555
))
💘7custom 49090038796575058944custom 51994070454045424554
я ждала от людей большего, только потому что сама была готова перевернуть ради них целый мир, а потом поняла, что переворачивать мир нужно было для себя
💘5custom 51994070454045424554custom 58097691170365817024
🤩
custom 51994070454045424555custom 49090038796575058943custom 53436557511287265703
🩷
custom 49090038796575058945custom 53436557511287265704custom 51994070454045424553
сильные не ищут замену человеку, который был им дорог, а смотрят в упор в ту пустоту, которая образовалась после его ухода. слабые же в эту пустоту пытаются запихнуть кого угодно, лишь бы создать иллюзию, что в их жизни нет пустых мест.
💘4custom 49090038796575058942custom 52020448940586610062
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @witthhlovee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“моё пристанище.” (@witthhlovee), 3 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/witthhlovee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.