Можете накидать мне тут приличных исключений на любую, в целом, тематику, просто чтоб я не разочаровывалась в человечестве и не считала всех подкастеров носителями раздутого чсв Ну или чтоб утвердилась в этом мнении🌚
Signed Galina Gavrilenko

Channel
@withakindword
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
418subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001516670554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @withakindword |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/withakindword |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 418 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 421 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 422 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 422 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,070 |
| Reactions total | 241 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
324 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 93 | 28.7% | |
| 😁 | 68 | 21.0% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 15.4% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 5.25% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 4.01% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 3.09% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 2.78% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 2.16% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.926% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.617% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.309% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.309% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 324reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Можете накидать мне тут приличных исключений на любую, в целом, тематику, просто чтоб я не разочаровывалась в человечестве и не считала всех подкастеров носителями раздутого чсв Ну или чтоб утвердилась в этом мнении🌚
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Регулярно, натыкаясь на говорильный жанр, более известный как «подкаст», по интересующей теме, думаю тяжелую думу примерно такого содержания: ОТСЫПЬТЕ, БЛЯДЬ, САМООЦЕНКИ, А Я тоже хочу ощущать себя настолько невъебенной, чтоб всерьез полагать, что кто-то будет полтора часа слушать, как я чото рассказываю, экая, мэкая и мучительно подбирая слова, еще и перескакивая с одной невероятно гениальной мысли на другую и обрат…
👍13💯5🌚2
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Пришла вам сообщить, что меня крайне утомляет белковая истерия. Заказываешь продукты - буквально у всего есть позиция «с повышенным содержанием белка», от йогурта до пива. Жду высокопротеиновые минералку и совиньон блан, затаив дыхание! Умолчим стыдливо, что, например, в магазине вкусвилл практически все «протеиновые» позиции содержат белка меньше, чем низкобелковые аналоги, но вот пивко меня чот окончательно подкос…
🤝13💯5❤1
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Ааааааааа сукааааааааа (узнала об этом в соседнем чатике, молилась чтоб ребята так шутили)
🔥12👀5😱3🙈1
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Моя психика так заботливо меня бережет, что я уже третий раз забываю о грядущем сериале Полдень и каждый раз трогательно удивляюсь, что Максима Каммерера сыграет Колокольников
😁12❤1
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Уважаемые озон и сильно менее уважаемые вб! Я искренне абсолютно сочувствую происходящему, и готова продолжать разоряться с помощью ваших сервисов, даже увеличенное ожидание и туманные перспективы доставки не то чтобы сильно смущают Только давайте уже эту клоунаду с «выключите впн» оставим в прошлом, а? Очевидно же, блядь, что не помогло 🌚
👍21😁8
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Кстати, а знаете, почему Швейцария - великая морская держава? Ну я вам уже подсказала предыдущим постом, конечно 🌚 Потому что ее флаг побывал в Бездне Челленджер на борту Триеста.
🔥12
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Как связаны Star Trek и Марианский желоб? Примерно такие разговоры мы с мужем вели на семейном мероприятии, фоточки с которого можно наблюдать выше. Ну, вернее, было так: мою подзатуманенную текилой головушку озарила светлая мысль, что отважный капитан Звездного флота и чувак, первым (вместе с напарником) достигший глубины почти 11 км, носили одну и ту же фамилию и это не может быть просто совпадением. И это таки …
🔥24😁1
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Ебенявыходногодня
🔥38❤1
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
https://t.me/galin_zoopark/1361
❤25🎉4
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Вчера в разговоре с мамой была одарена знанием, что в новостях количество осадков нынче преподносят в литрах на кв метр. Ну спасибо, блядь, что не в ведрах, - сказала я, - и полезла гуглить. В первых же пяти результатах нашлась прямая речь специалиста росгидромета с упоминанием 8-9 ведер, которые вот-вот выльются на каждый квадратный метр столицы нашей многострадальной родины, естественно 🥴 Минутка новостей заключа…
👍16😁9❤7🐳1👀1
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
https://t.me/galin_zoopark/1359
😍17❤5🎉5🔥2
Signed Galina Gavrilenko
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @withakindword. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Добрым словом и пистолетом” (@withakindword), 418 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/withakindword.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.