Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

EN EREBOS PHOS

@witchitgood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,680subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001208929556
TypeChannel
Username@witchitgood
Created19 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/witchitgood

Growth

3,6803,6833,681.56 August 2026 — 3,683 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,683 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,682 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,680–3,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:473,680-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:123,682-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:483,683no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:523,683first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7661.3%
🔥108.06%
🙏97.26%
🦄54.03%
❤‍🔥43.23%
🤣43.23%
🤓32.42%
21.61%
🏆21.61%
🤔21.61%
🤮21.61%
🥰21.61%
🌚10.806%
👍10.806%
👏10.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,800 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🙏6🦄5❤‍🔥2🏆2

5 Apr 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,760 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Could it be you're afraid of what your friends might say, If they knew you believe in God above?"

8🤣4🤔2🤮2🙏2

14 Feb 2026, 09:24 UTC≈2,180 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @reikannokawaPhoto

The Garden Behind the Moon, 1895 Howard Pyle

13🔥2🥰2

14 Feb 2026, 09:24 UTC≈1,600 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gothlatentePhoto

Lonely Centaur by Ferdinand Keller

12

14 Feb 2026, 09:22 UTC≈2,130 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Death and the Magician (2021, LP Cover) - Ayis Lertas

14

14 Feb 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Der Wegweiser (2020) - Inken Stabell

3🌚1

14 Feb 2026, 09:21 UTC890 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

José Benlliure, “The Barque of Charon”, from ‘Die Kunst: Monatsheft für freie und angewandte Kunst’, 1903

5

14 Feb 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,390 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes

🔥21

14 Feb 2026, 09:20 UTC804 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Vanitas: A Skull, Books & Lamp (1919) - Jacques Hartog

3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @witchitgood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 334,571 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EN EREBOS PHOS” (@witchitgood), 3,680 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/witchitgood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.