Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for -دنیای پریان-

Channel

-دنیای پریان-

@witchcraf_store

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,693subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001505956053
TypeChannel
Username@witchcraf_store
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/witchcraf_store

Growth

9,6939,7199,7061 October 2026 — 9,719 subscribers6 October 2026 — 9,693 subscribers1 October 20266 October 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,689–9,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 08:389,693-26
1 Oct 2026, 19:229,719first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 9,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held20 (7 June 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total3,090
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

642 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24037.4%
👍9915.4%
😭9815.3%
💔7010.9%
💘6910.7%
💋152.34%
🍓111.71%
🌚81.25%
😁81.25%
😨71.09%
🔥60.935%
🥰50.779%
😍20.312%
🤔20.312%
🕊10.156%
😢10.156%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,090 views50 reactionsread 1 October 2026

بچه ها به جرعت میتونم بگم فال های این دو تا خواهر تنها فال هایی هستن که all the time به کمکتون میاد ، تو برای فلانی پارسال فال بگیر امسال هم همون ویس گوش بدی به دردت میخوره :) چه برسه به فال های شخصی درباره خودتون :) ❤️

❤50

Signed Saina

21 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC≈2,000 views27 reactionsread 1 October 2026

بچه‌ها چندنفر گفتن می‌خواستن فال سفارش بدن ولی ایران نیستن، اگه شماهم این شرایط رو دارین بهم تکست بدین راهنمایی‌تون کنم

❤21🌚3👍2🍓1

Signed TabanShin-

13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈6,360 views19 reactionsread 1 October 2026

بفرمایید https://www.instagram.com/p/Db-9Ndyja4j/?igsh=MTE5bXkwZ2VueTN4ZQ==

💋15🌚2❤1🔥1

Signed TabanShin-

13 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈6,120 views24 reactionsread 1 October 2026

یه پست مشتی براتون آماده کردم که ساعت ۶ می‌ذارم

💘18🍓3🔥3

Signed TabanShin-

28 Jun 2026, 17:44 UTC≈10,800 views60 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @blcwolf_ResultsPhoto

#تحقق این یکی رو نمی‌شد فردا بذارم😭😭😭😭 گوجوها

💘47❤10🍓2😁1

Signed TabanShin-

24 Jun 2026, 12:50 UTC≈8,960 views21 reactionsread 1 October 2026

دوم هم این‌که از اسپیریت‌بردهاتون عکس‌های خوشگل برام بفرستین، بهترین‌شون رو می‌ذارم چنل @Tabanshin

❤20🍓1

Signed TabanShin-

24 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC≈8,380 views22 reactionsread 1 October 2026

یکی این‌که اگه مشتری ثابتین و اکانتتون رو سیو کردم و می‌شناسمتون، دیلی من به‌روی شما بازه👹🫵 https://t.me/+vAsY0JCSaqw3Yjg0

❤20🍓2

Signed TabanShin-

24 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC≈8,770 views11 reactionsread 1 October 2026

دوتا موضوع

❤10🍓1

Signed TabanShin-

20 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTC≈9,520 views14 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Poll

.

  1. اره دوست داریم همههههه چیزی که اومده رو بدونیم90%
  2. نه فقط جواب رو خودت بررسی کن و بگو12%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤14

Signed TabanShin-

20 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈6,560 views62 reactionsread 1 October 2026

این‌که توی فال‌ها، علاوه بر محتوای فال اصلی‌تون، اسم‌ کارت‌ها و نمادهارو می‌گم و تحلیلشون می‌کنم رو دوست دارید؟ یا ترجیح می‌دین مثل قبل فقط جواب رو بگم

👍53🥰5😍2❤1🍓1

Signed TabanShin-

16 Jun 2026, 11:32 UTC≈7,170 views20 reactionsread 1 October 2026

خوشگلا قبل واریز بهم بگین که بهتون شماره کارت جدید بدم. کارتم درست نشد

❤20

Signed TabanShin-

13 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC≈7,740 views42 reactionsread 1 October 2026

بچه‌ها صادرات فوت کرده، صبر کنین اگه تا فردا درست نشد بهم پیام بدین شماره کارت جدید بدم

💔33😁4🌚2👍2❤1

Signed TabanShin-

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @witchcraf_store. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTCAnonymous Poll512 voters

.

  1. اره دوست داریم همههههه چیزی که اومده رو بدونیم90%
  2. نه فقط جواب رو خودت بررسی کن و بگو12%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

"𝖤𝗋𝗈𝗌 | الهه عشق‌شهوت
@erosclub_ir · 19,356
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 1 October 2026
Subliminal_affirmation | سازنده ساب شخصی
@subliminal_affirmation · 18,794
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-دنیای پریان-” (@witchcraf_store), 9,693 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/witchcraf_store.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.