Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Satoshi На Скамейке

Channel

Satoshi На Скамейке

@witam1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50,571subscribers

+50,285 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002245184502
TypeChannel
Username@witam1
DescriptionДля связи @bbogv Основной канал: https://t.me/witam0
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/witam1

Growth

28476,80738,545.57 August 2026 — 286 subscribers8 August 2026 — 286 subscribers16 August 2026 — 284 subscribers24 August 2026 — 76,807 subscribers25 August 2026 — 73,606 subscribers26 August 2026 — 61,185 subscribers27 August 2026 — 58,907 subscribers28 August 2026 — 58,653 subscribers29 August 2026 — 58,504 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,571 subscribers50,5717 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +50,285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:0950,571-7,933
29 Aug 2026, 10:0858,504-149
28 Aug 2026, 08:2358,653-254
27 Aug 2026, 09:2858,907-2,278
26 Aug 2026, 08:1261,185-12,421
25 Aug 2026, 11:2673,606-3,201
24 Aug 2026, 10:1376,807+76,523
16 Aug 2026, 15:05284-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:20286no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:57286first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 30 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 50,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
781
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held23 (30 August 202519 August 2026)
Views total3,123
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

265 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7126.8%
🔥6725.3%
🥰259.43%
custom 5318912268442803940176.42%
🤯166.04%
👏155.66%
😁134.91%
🤩93.40%
custom 531875840553439238972.64%
custom 531883610578774431172.64%
🎉72.64%
😱51.89%
👌31.13%
👎20.755%
🤔10.377%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 23 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @witam1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2025 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC812 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🌐 Домены ⁠.gram⁠: что это такое, когда ждать и как на этом заработать? Дуров подал заявку в ICANN на закрепление новой доменной зоны ⁠.gram⁠. Коротко говоря ,объединяют веб3,сайты и тд в одну движуху внутри ТГ. 📌 Что вообще такое ⁠.gram⁠? Это полноценная доменная зона верхнего уровня (как ⁠.com⁠ или ⁠.org⁠), созданная под экосистему Telegram. Главная фишка — возможность запускать сайты и интерактивные Telegram Mini

🔥6👍4👏3

18 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC757 views12 reactions3 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Пару слов про .t.me / .gram домены. Тема сейчас дико интересная, особенно всё, что касается коротких имен. По сути, это та же цифровая недвижимость, которая на фоне развития мини-аппов в телеге будет только дорожать и забирать на себя внимание. Я тут сел разбираться во всем этом плотнее: ковыряю цифры, смотрю на движуху и собираю инфу. Короче, скоро оформлю все мысли в нормальный разбор — с фактами, выводами и тем,

👍5🔥5👏2

16 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC798 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Bitcoin зажат в тисках на $48 млрд! Именно столько сейчас висит в позициях с плечом. Рынок в буквальном смысле сидит на пороховой бочке: Вниз: Чуть что — и полетят каскадные ликвидации перегретых лонгов (офшорное финансирование держит их под ударом). Вверх: На CME институционалы сидят в жестких шортах, так что при пробое выше нас ждет мощнейший шорт-сквиз. Короче говоря, ждем резкого движения — волатильность неиз

12 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC756 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас пока ебашим золото ,скоро запустим проект в котором заработаете все кто зайдет😱👻

25 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC450 viewsread 30 August 2026

ОБЗОР НА ЗОЛОТО На следующей неделе буду искать лонговые позиции. На часовике увидел слом структуры ,и буду ждать конфирм от которого буду отталкиваться. Остальное будем смотреть по ходу рынка ,новостей и ситуаций. https://ru.tradingview.com/x/1irVghWj

24 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC353 viewsread 30 August 2026

Всем салам ,остался ли тут кто-то живой ?? Есть кто разбирается в спредах и что с ними можно мутить. У меня иметься инфа на токены со спредом. Писать сюда :@informadmi

4 Feb 2026, 11:03 UTC670 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Давно ничего не писал, да и вообще меня не было какое-то время. Но то, что сейчас происходит с золотом и серебром, уже все видели. Кто читает мой канал давно — помнит, я говорил, что серебро надо брать. Тогда цена была в районе 70. Потом дали 122 — и дальше началось то, что многие называют «обычным откатом». Но это не обычный откат. Слив был кривой. Нарушили кучу рыночных правил: проливали без ликвидности, пробивал

👍1🔥1

11 Dec 2025, 16:18 UTC360 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026

ФРС снова опустила ставку на 0,25%. Доллар подсел, рынки подросли, серебро на максимумах. В самой ФРС уже спорят — дальше снижать ставку становится опасно. Короче: экономика нервничает, рынки радуются. Что будет дальше — увидим. Серебро на долгосрок выглядит очень круто,буду по чуть чуть набирать позиции))

🔥2🥰1

9 Dec 2025, 15:43 UTC576 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026

ПОЧЕМУ СЕРЕБРО ЭТО ЛУЧШАЯ ИНВЕСТИЦИЯ НА ДОЛГОСРОК🙏 Соотношение золота и серебра и что оно говорит о будущем серебра В природе золота добывают в 8–9 раз меньше, чем серебра — соотношение примерно 1:8. Но на рынке всё иначе: сегодня Gold/Silver Ratio = 70–90, то есть серебро стоит в 7–10 раз дешевле, чем должно быть по природному балансу. Исторически такие уровни означают одно — серебро недооценено. Почему так? Сер

👍5🥰4🔥3

20 Nov 2025, 20:06 UTC598 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

РЫНОК Еще в августе я писал свои мысли по крипте на ближайшее время. Писал что к зиме биток будет в районе 70к,а вот с ЭФИРОМ я не угадал,ушел он ниже чем я мог подумать. Думаю что в ближайшее время отката ждать нету смысла,рынок и дальше будет двигать вниз пока не выйдут СУПЕР МЕГА положительные новости. P.S:TONу вообще плохо ,чувствую что его увидем по 1$ если Дуров ничего с этим делать не будет…

🥰4👍2👏2🔥2

15 Nov 2025, 21:48 UTC222 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

НОВЫЙ СКАМ ТГ… Кто эти люди которые готовы влить 10 миллионов ⭐️≠150к☺️ Первый раунд ,первое место в топе ,тратит 10🍋 что бы получить подарок,сейчас эта шляпа торгуется в 2к☺️ Зачем это нужно ?И кому ? Все кто влил сюда бабки и получили эти подарки все в минусах. Каждый дроп торгуется в минус.Почему? Челы которые влили свои звезды в ботов по авто покупке хотят вернуть хоть какую то часть денег ,по этому все подар

🔥4🥰3👍2

31 Oct 2025, 20:41 UTC336 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Опять говно за Овер прайс ??? Кто хочет бесплатно ?

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @witam1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 520,225 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Satoshi На Скамейке” (@witam1), 50,571 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/witam1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.