4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,691–1,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 22:27
1,693
-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:31
1,696
-8
7 Aug 2026, 16:03
1,704
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:58
1,704
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 1,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
210
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
3,987
Reactions total
279
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
279 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
143
51.3%
🔥
109
39.1%
👍
10
3.58%
⚡
9
3.23%
👀
3
1.08%
✍
2
0.717%
🫡
2
0.717%
😁
1
0.358%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$YOTS looking good. Up a solid 55% since the call and I know where this one's going and it's way beyond here.
Article should be out today.
The dev's a dog. We run in similar AI circles, a lot of crossover with mutuals so I know he's very connected.
He's sent things way past 100m mc before, so it could definitely happen here. Best project I've seen come out of that camp.
$Unity looking beautiful. I was scanning wa…
Just hit 500 downloads! Did you get your copy of Entry Mastery V2?
2 SOL giveaway, entries close Sunday midnight EST. Rules are pinned in the chat above.
LOCK IT IN. FREE EDUCATION.
https://x.com/Wisemenmentors/status/2085555725665730785?s=20
👤 The Wisemen (6.8K) 🗓1m 👁️101
Entry Mastery V2 came out Tuesday. 500 downloads as of tonight, and the reviews are better than anything we've put out.
The book is about the one piece of this you get to decide, your entry price. Everything after that happens without asking you.
Nobody's tagging you at the bottom. Half the chat has already called it dead and moved on. That's the cost of a good entry, sitting there l…
Morning Tea 🍵 (Morning Podcast Above)
Wild swings. Yesterday said one thing (down), today says the opposite (UP) 😂. Solana moves faster than anywhere I've traded, and that speed is exactly what wrecked me early. You get used to it, then you learn to operate inside it, and that's when it starts paying off.
@RoaringKitty has the heart of retail that nobody else has. People look at him and see themselves. No Lambo, no…
Tis the season.
Why not us?
Yo big shoutout to @driodhustlerog. Every community got a heartbeat and that dude's been bullposting unity everyday for 2.5 years. Bro's different 🔥. Really good dude pure heart.
Follow HIM! @driodhustlerog
We've all literally been together for 2 years now. It's crazy broo lol.
Unityyyyy
Imagine the bottom of the market and Roaring kitty starts getting active lol. 🙃
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wisemenfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@wisemenfree named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@driodhustlerog named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@theroaringkitty named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@unity_onsol named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Wisemen (Free)” (@wisemenfree), 1,693 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wisemenfree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
