Channel
@wisecryptoinsights
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001542823184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wisecryptoinsights |
| Created | 13 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wisecryptoinsights |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2023 to 30 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MetaMecha (MM) 🟢 ETH $0.001537 Price Volume B/S 5M: 9.29% $4.61K 9/3 1H: 9.29% $4.61K 9/3 1D: 9.29% $4.61K 9/3 MC: 32.3K | Liq: 30.4K (100% 🔒 PinkSale 3mos) Tax: 0 / 0 (150K / 106K gas) Age: 4 minutes | Holders: 6 Chart: /c_6cC188 DexView | DEXScreener | DexTools 0x6cC188d53045A93b752532a9Aa0aABA760FeF0d9 CA: Verified, Renounced (check for hidden functions) Holders |…
$MTE - MixToEarn: It seems a solid team is developing a anon mixer finally. The previous "LEGIT" kind of token hit like 50-60M mcap. I have always been bullish on this kind of utility, even tho last 3 that I aped were farms, this seems to be different in a few points: Barely no one talked about it Chart looking organic and been slowmooning for a few days Non toxic community (so far) Lets see how this turns out, bu…
Half Pepe | $PEPE0.5 (@thehalfpepe) / Twitter Half Pepe just launched on ETH! 🎉 Ca: 0xb02f53a029944386074c831bef888a680d6ace71 We're making sure the right people are in and have a good grip of the floor. Follow the twitter, our first post $PEPE0.5B will be out soon. https://twitter.com/thehalfpepe https://halfpepe.wtf/ https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x3311a8910fe3b48455033fb3167e54e491ee1b30 …
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xb11b25cfa5ad66e81525eb05d54808646a70d49a
Bought a bag of $FED at 185k thinking it’s a good entry 0 Tax LP Burned Renouced Good volume Devs last project 3.3M TG - t.me/FED_ETH feedeverydegen.com
WU KONG $Wukong LP BURNT TAX 0 wukongerc.online t.me/WuKong_ERC twitter.com/WuKong_ERC 0x44d2e297bc265702aa4f9f21d25e04b7a12d3e27 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xcd3d036fdd7ef44e7940c02936aeec4d066a80b6
$KONG Whales are coming!!
Channel photo updated
Photo, posted without a caption
Since yesterday all eyes are on $KONG and it was recently doing well. Maybe it’s the next alpha? Chart is slowly recovering and I think it’s a good opportunity to buy some $KONG. https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x3ba47c54b4e2bc7e95df7c8d2002789e9fd71f09 t.me/kongerc20 twitter.com/KONG_ERC
Still holding $DPHI First utility Symposium Chat dropping to the public tomorrow 6/12/23. Predicting a real pump back to ATH fast. Let’s see if it will be realized in few hours or few days 😇 dextools.io/app/en/ether/p https://t.me/Delphi_Protocol_Portal
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wisecryptoinsights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wisecryptoinsights named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Wise Insights” (@wisecryptoinsights), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wisecryptoinsights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.