Channel
@wirtschafstcrash2020
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
231subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001334679294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wirtschafstcrash2020 |
| Created | 23 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wirtschafstcrash2020 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 231 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 230 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 230 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 432 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Laut einer Meta-Studie gibt es tatsächlich keine Ansteckung. 🤷♂️ Dieser Artikel wird ca. in drei Wochen offen sein für alle, und beweist anscheinend, dass es keine Ansteckung gibt. Vielleicht gibt es doch Ansteckung, und das Immunsystem des Individuums entscheidet, ob es krank wird oder nicht? 🤔 Lesen kann ich den Artikel bisher auch nicht, aber Mike Yeadon hat ihn geteilt, und er scheint überzeugt zu sein. Was i…
Signed ChrisITSCM
Na heute sehen die Kondensstreifen ja wieder richtig normal aus 😉😉😉
Signed ChrisITSCM
Zufallsfund - Martin Wehrle, Sachbuchautor und Karriereberater - im Leben würde ich solche Videos nicht anschauen, bei den reißerischen Titelbildern. Aber offenbar bekommt man ohne diese sehr lebhaften Teaser-Bilder keine Zuschauer. 😉 Sein Name wurde mir bekannt durch ein sehr gutes Angelbuch, und natürlich hat meine Neugier seinen Namen im Internet suchen lassen. Siehe da, ein etwa 10 Jahre alter Kanal, mit vielen …
Signed ChrisITSCM
Interessante These 🤔 allerdings fallen mir spontan noch etwa zehn weitere Gründe für schlechten Schlaf ein. 😊 Ich kann nur von mir sprechen - ich hatte Zeit meines Lebens äußerst guten, tiefen Schlaf. Hab aber auch nie im Hochhaus gewohnt. Also vielleicht ist die These etwas zu allgemein gefasst - ausprobieren könnten man es ja trotzdem - barfuß laufen und draußen schlafen, auf elektrisch leitendem Material. 😉 http…
Signed ChrisITSCM
Daniele Ganser stellt fest, dass die USA den Irankrieg bereits verloren haben. 🤷♂ Kommt das so eigentlich auch in der Tagesschau? 😉😉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dAX9CLsghQ
Signed ChrisITSCM
Guter Artikel für den WhatsApp Status, über das Krank-Mach-Potenzial von Windrädern..... Ehrlich gesagt glaube ich nicht, dass Windräder noch lange "laufen", als Markt. Es hat sich doch inzwischen rumgesprochen, dass die Dinger nicht das Gelbe vom Ei sind. https://www.tichyseinblick.de/kolumnen/lichtblicke-kolumnen/windraeder-klimaretter-oder-krankmacher/
Signed ChrisITSCM
Schöne Überspitzung des Zustands unserer Gesellschaft 😉 und was für Zombies das Handy aus uns macht. (Zum Glück wohne ich in einer Gegend, in der kaum jemand so extrem ins Handy schaut, zumindest nicht in der Öffentlichkeit oder im Restaurant - hier reden die Leute noch miteinander.....Vereinzelung in Großstädten lässt grüßen 😉 das war ja schon vor dem Handy so, schon vor 30 Jahren.) https://www.youtube.com/watch…
Signed ChrisITSCM
Das sagen die Professoren bestimmt schon länger - gehört werden sie immer nur wenn es Politik und (Finanz-)Wirtschaft in den Kram passt. Es wurde wohl inzwischen genug Geld verdient mit Windrädern. 🤷♂️ Finden und beheben wir die Fehler im System! https://blackout-news.de/energie/kraftwerksabschaltungen-stoppen-professoren-fordern-kurswechsel-bei-wind-und-solar/
Signed ChrisITSCM
"Das Buch setzt sich mit der Frage auseinander, wie Gesellschaften ohne zentrale Verwaltung - sprich, den Staat - organisiert werden können. Dabei geht es primär um Gegenentwürfe zur zunehmenden Machtkonzentration von Staat und Konzernoligarchien. Um Konzepte, die dem supranationalen Korporatismus mit dezentralen und eigenverantwortlichen Ansätzen begegnen wollen. Um Voluntarismus." Ganz genau. Mal sehen, ob das Buc…
👍2
Signed ChrisITSCM
Vielleicht ist es genau das was wir brauchen.....🤔 https://www.klartext-kompass.de/selbstdenkerkompass
Signed ChrisITSCM
Wie kriegen wir nur diese Leute von den Hebeln der Macht entfernt? 🤔 Oder werden genug von ihnen Florian Homm folgen? Wie kriegen wir die Hebel der Macht entfernt? Sie sind einfach zu riesig. Wer auch immer daran hängt, ist viel zu mächtig. Kein Baum wächst in den Himmel......... 🤷♂️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9CTFKQfgVY
Signed ChrisITSCM
Deutschland hat fertig! https://blackout-news.de/aktuelles/deutschland-im-niedergang-auslaendische-medien-sehen-zerfall-von-infrastruktur-und-industrie/
Signed ChrisITSCM
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wirtschafstcrash2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Strategien für den Wirtschaftscrash” (@wirtschafstcrash2020), 231 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wirtschafstcrash2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.