8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,599–1,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 10:45
1,653
+13
23 Aug 2026, 23:59
1,640
+3
20 Aug 2026, 08:36
1,637
+3
17 Aug 2026, 16:04
1,634
+14
14 Aug 2026, 16:46
1,620
+12
11 Aug 2026, 03:12
1,608
+2
7 Aug 2026, 21:17
1,606
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:34
1,606
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 1,653 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
6 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
693
Reactions total
27
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5449380056201697322
12
30.0%
❤🔥
8
20.0%
👍
8
20.0%
😱
6
15.0%
😍
5
12.5%
🥰
1
2.50%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 People of WINWIN: meet Rodion
We're continuing our series about the WINWIN Partners team. Our second hero is Rodion, Affiliate Manager for the European market.
Rodion joined the team recently and already works with one of the most demanding regions out there.
Why it's products that get oversaturated — not Europe itself — and why traffic quality beats volume: swipe through 👆
Got a question for the team? Drop it …
🌟 THE WINWIN COLLECTION
We've developed a branded merch collection in the WINWIN Partners identity — for our partners, our team, and friends of the industry.
Leather bags, hoodies, and accessories are made in the brand's recognizable style and reflect the same approach we bring to developing our affiliate program: attention to detail and quality at every stage.
In the new video — the collection at the conference a…
⚜️ WINWIN PERFORMANCE CHALLENGE: two weeks to the finish
The biggest performance event of this summer is entering the home stretch. Two weeks left — and the top prizes are still up for grabs.
The leaderboard updates three times a week, so the standings can shift at any moment. One strong run of traffic can move you up several positions.
🏆 Still in play:
— Rolex Datejust
— Fanatec Podium Racing Setup
— MacBook Pro
…
📰 The WINWIN Times. July issue
July showed that the market depends less on individual events and more on how quickly teams can adapt.
Major tournaments create the peaks, but the result is defined by what happens after them: how the audience redistributes, which segments take over attention, and how fast teams adjust their approach.
👉 In the July issue:
— Why major tournament audiences don't disappear, but redistrib…
🌟 WINWIN Partners' CMO answers
Daria Averkina, CMO of WINWIN Partners — on visuals, trust, and why branding wins even where "only odds matter."
— Why the premium visuals?
Social media is a brand's business card and the first touchpoint with a partner. In the first few seconds, people judge only one thing — how you look. If the profile feels weak, the eye doesn't catch, and no one reads what's behind it. Our job is …
⚜️ Two brands in the WINWIN ecosystem: WinWinBet and GoldPari
Partners often ask what makes our brands different and whether they can work with both. Here's how the ecosystem is structured.
🌟 Two products:
— WinWinBet
— GoldPari
Each brand has its own partner cabinet and its own terms
🌟 What it means for partners:
— two products for different audiences: if your traffic converts better with another product, the se…
😱3😍1custom 54493800562016973221
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @winwinpartners_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
1xBet Affiliate Program @partners1xbet · 84,059 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 August 2026
1XBET_NEWS @News_1XPartners · 47,561 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WINWIN PARTNERS WORLDWIDE” (@winwinpartners_en), 1,653 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/winwinpartners_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
