Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Wind of Change

@windofchange20

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,212subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300936543
TypeChannel
Username@windofchange20
DescriptionDies ist der Kanal für alternative Nachrichten von Sarah Schmid, der Alleingeburtstante. ✌️
Created23 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/windofchange20

Growth

1,2126 Aug 2026, 20:23 — 1,212 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:31 — 1,212 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:236 Aug 2026, 20:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,211–1,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:311,212no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:231,212first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.6%
avg views ÷ 1,212 subscribers
Avg views / post
468
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (27 December 202522 July 2026)
Views total936
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,960
Videos
2,650
Links
7,680

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC474 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @oliverjanichPhoto

"Deutsche Auswanderung 1820–heute. Drei große Wellen. Immer dann, wenn der Leviathan besonders gierig war. 1854: Steuern, Militärpflicht, Bürokratie. 1881: Der Obrigkeitsstaat auf Steroiden. Weltkriege, Hyperinflation, NS-Diktatur, Nachkriegssozialismus – jedes Mal dasselbe Muster: Der Staat dehnt sich aus, die Freiheit schrumpft, die Produktiven verschwinden. Und jetzt? 2016–2025: Rekordzahlen. Nicht, weil die Deu

10 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC713 viewsread 6 August 2026

Wenn sie ihren Willen nicht mit halbwegs lauteren Mittel durchdrücken können, werden eben unlautere Mittel geschaffen und genutzt in Unserer Demokratie™.

10 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC780 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @auf1tvPhoto

Totalüberwachung beschlossen: 🇪🇺 EU-Parlament führt Chat-Kontrolle wieder ein! Das Europäische Parlament hat heute per Eilverfahren die bereits zweimal abgelehnte und seit April abgelaufene Chat-Kontrolle wiederbelebt. Mit einem perfiden Abstimmungs-Trick wurde die Massenüberwachung privater Chats wieder eingeführt. Statt einer normalen Mehrheit brauchte es zur Ablehnung eine absolute Mehrheit von 361 Nein-Stimmen,

12 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @auf1tvPhoto

Nach dem knappen Wahlsieg der Systemparteien in Aue-Bad Schlema: Jetzt fordern erste Politiker eine Gesetzesänderung! Nach der knappen Oberbürgermeisterwahl im sächsischen Aue-Bad Schlema, AUF1 berichtete, wird derzeit heiß über mögliche Gesetzeslücken diskutiert. Der Kandidat der „Freien Sachsen“ Stefan Hartung verfehlte im zweiten Wahlgang nur knapp die Mehrheit. Nun fordern erste Politiker eine Änderung des Wahl

26 May 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 6 August 2026

Mal sehen, ob auch das nach der ganzen Propaganda in den Staatsmedien und Schulen ankommt. Hat jemand was bemerkt? https://nius.de/gesellschaft/ipcc-wissenschaftler-klima-horrorszenario-rcp-85-narrativ

27 Apr 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @KlartextBaum

Hier nun mit korrektem Link. Ich habe gerade unterzeichnet. Liebe Freunde, die E-Petition 189940 der MWGFD-Arbeitsgruppe "Masernschutzgesetz" zur Aufhebung des selbigen und der darin formulierten Masernimpfpflicht ist ab sofort auf dem Onlineserver des Petitionsausschuss des Deutschen Bundestags zur Zeichnung freigeschaltet. https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/content/petitionen/_2025/_11/_03/Petition_189940.html Pe

11 Apr 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rabbitresearchVideo

sollte jeder mal gesehen haben 📰 Wie Udo Ulfkotte Kriegsberichtersttattung auffliegen ließ 👉 Der 2017 plötzlich und unerwartet verstorbene ehemalige FAZ-Journalist, Udo Ulfkotte über das Procedere bei der Kriegsberichterstattung. 👉 Hier noch mehr über Ulfkotte 👉 auf telegram 👉auf substack 👉auf youtube 👉auf odysee 👉auf Twitter .

11 Apr 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 6 August 2026

Wie soll man wissen, ob irgendetwas stimmt, was die Medien berichten? Ich glaube ja inzwischen gar nichts mehr, außer ich kann es mit eigenen Augen beobachten.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @windofchange20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wind of Change” (@windofchange20), 1,212 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/windofchange20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.