Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for William Wallace Welker

Channel

William Wallace Welker

@williamwallacewelker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,115subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001187573941
TypeChannel
Username@williamwallacewelker
Created14 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/williamwallacewelker

Growth

5,1155,1335,1246 August 2026 — 5,133 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,126 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,121 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,115 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,112–5,136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:155,115-6
10 Aug 2026, 14:515,121-5
7 Aug 2026, 17:245,126-7
6 Aug 2026, 22:025,133first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,024 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯45144.0%
🔥11911.6%
908.79%
🙏565.47%
🤣565.47%
444.30%
👍414.00%
😁383.71%
😢363.52%
👏272.64%
🤬232.25%
🎉131.27%
🤔80.781%
💩60.586%
❤‍🔥40.391%
😱40.391%
🕊30.293%
🤯20.195%
🍌10.098%
😐10.098%
1 further kind10.098%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,024reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 04:05 UTC996 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/paulsaladinomd/status/2075282391082426720

👍7❤‍🔥42

Signed Will Welker

15 May 2026, 17:19 UTC≈2,100 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Try to share a think on Telegram. The channels load and shift under my finger, so that when I tap a channel, a different channel pops in under my finger and gets selected. Loading channels could just be appended to the bottom of the list instead of shuffling it all around. Been going on 5 years now. But hey, we got cool emojis here... Or whatever. Find me on X: https://x.com/Will_W_Welker

15🕊3👍1

Signed Will Welker

10 Jan 2026, 17:35 UTC≈11,000 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/usedgov/status/2009637618292506857

🔥27🤣24

Signed Will Welker

7 Jan 2026, 04:02 UTC≈3,340 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Google is evil. And like a vampire, can only come into your home if invited. Try real hard not to be dumb. https://x.com/cb_doge/status/2008707321665646834

💯397🔥31

Signed Will Welker

6 Jan 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,450 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Better than Telegram, better than Signal https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2008411864749760839

🎉13🤔7💩6😁2

Signed Will Welker

5 Jan 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,540 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

News happens on X https://x.com/pizzintwatch/status/2007152263471534345

12😱4🔥3🍌1😐1

Signed Will Welker

5 Jan 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,930 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯46🙏10😢9

Signed Will Welker

29 Dec 2025, 18:50 UTC≈2,470 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2005645187725631803

😁30🤣182

Signed Will Welker

21 Dec 2025, 22:01 UTC≈3,530 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

It was always just the Flu.

💯75🔥103

Signed Will Welker

18 Dec 2025, 22:28 UTC≈2,560 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/Resist_CBDC/status/2001526095217349064

💯836

Signed Will Welker

15 Dec 2025, 06:11 UTC≈2,730 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯61🔥16🤔1

Signed Will Welker

9 Dec 2025, 05:38 UTC≈2,750 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1998203277540999549

237😁5

Signed Will Welker

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @williamwallacewelker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 999,278 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“William Wallace Welker” (@williamwallacewelker), 5,115 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/williamwallacewelker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.