Channel
@wikizoom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,371subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001064782583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wikizoom |
| Created | 26 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wikizoom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 7,371 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 7,380 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 7,386 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,388 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 7,388 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
234 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 102 | 43.6% | |
| 🤬 | 63 | 26.9% | |
| 😁 | 38 | 16.2% | |
| 💩 | 30 | 12.8% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.427% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2024 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قرار است چه شود؟ سرانجامِ رخدادهای اخیر، از تنشهای خونین دو روزه میدانی تا آرایش نظامی ایران- آمریکا و جریان مذاکرات، نشانگر حقایقی عریان است که میتوان در محورهای زیر خلاصه کرد: ۱- برخلاف هیاهوهای درازمدت رسانه ای، جمهوری اسلامی نه قصد برخورد «عاشورایی» دارد و نه اصلاً ساختار کنونیاش تابِ چنان نگرشی را میآورد. تجربه نشان داده که هسته سخت قدرت برای حفظ نظام در برابر تهدیدهای موجودیتی و نزدیک، به «نرمشی» فراتر …
⚠️تصادف شدید پژو با اسب در شهر کازرون استان فارس @wikizoom
🤬3
باقری؛ نماینده مجلس: در زمان جنگ با اسرائیل؛ نه F35 زدیم؛ نه خلبانی گرفتیم؛ نه کارخانه تولید پهپاد گرفتیم و نه اون تعداد که گفتن جاسوس. صداوسیما نباید دروغ پخش میکرد + حاجی میخوای صداوسیمای مارو زیرسوال ببری؟ صدا وسیمای ما کی دروغ گفته که این دفه دومش باشه؟ :)) @wikizoom
😁6😍1
🔻 ما به دنبال تغییر رژیم در ایران نبودیم / جیدی ونس، معاون ترامپ: «همین چندماه پیش، برخی افراد رئیسجمهور را متهم میکردند که میخواهد ما را وارد یک جنگ تغییر رژیم با صدها هزار سرباز به نفع اسرائیل کند. اما رئیسجمهور قصد چنین کاری نداشت؛ او فقط میخواست تأسیسات هستهای ایران را هدف قرار دهد و همه را سالم به خانه بازگرداند. و دقیقاً همین کار را کرد.» + البته دوستان معتقدند زورشون نرسیده:)) @wikizoom
👍1😁1
پس از انقلاب ما تنها دو سال تورم تک رقمی داشتهایم؛ آن هم در سالهای اجرای برجام بود. بعد میگن تحریم اثر نداره:)) ✍صدرا فرهمند @wikizoom
👍7🤬3😁3
والا منم شکمم انقدر گنده بود هیچی رو حس نمیکردم حاج علم :)) @wikizoom
🤬17💩10👍1
در دنیا به تعداد انگشتان یک دست شاید پیدا شن افرادی که تورم۴۵درصد رو دستاورد بدونن و واسه اثباتش هم این ۴۵ رو با اعداد بالای۱۰۰مقایسه کنن، از شانس مردم ایران یکی از اینها رئیس جمهور کشورشون هست. @wikizoom
🤬19👍5
عیدتان مبارک 😁😅 @wikizoom
👍6
درآمد سرانه ایران در سال ١٣۶٢ حدود ۶٢٪ بیشتر از کره جنوبی بود و اکنون درآمد سرانه کره جنوبی بیش از ٧.٨ برابر درآمد سرانه ایران رشد اقتصادی و پیشرفت اتفاقی نیست. ایران درگیر استکبارستیزی، مشت زدن و مرگ بر این و آن شد و کرهجنوبی هدفمند به دنبال رشد و توسعه بود. Reza Kashef @wikizoom
👍14🤬1
تمام پلیدی ها در خانه ای قرارداده شده و کلید آن دروغگویی است. امام حسن عسگری @wikizoom
😁12👍9💩6🤬2
نتیجه سیاستها و تصمیمات مسئولین در طی این سالها همین یک خط هست، اتفاقی هست که افتاده و غیر قابل انکار تمام این مسئولین هم در زمان پست گرفتن از فیلترها رد شدن و اگه قرار هست همیشه گذشته رو نفی کنیم آینده هم نفی شده هست. @wikizoom
👍11
دبیر شورایعالی فضای مجازی:"متاسفانه استفاده از فیلترشکن زیاد شده.ما به دنبال علت یابی موضوع بودیم"! از طرف میپرسن دلیل اصلی طلاق چیه؟ میگه ازدواج!! یعنی اینها اندازه همون طرف هم عقل ندارند که بدونند دلیل اصلی زیاد شدن فیلترشکن، فیلتر کردن زیاد هست؟ تازه یه بودجه ای برا چندتا آقازاده در نظر میگیرند که برن موضوع رو علت یابی کنند چرا استفاده مردم از فیلترشکن زیاد شده :))) Azadeh Mokhtari @wikizoom
👍18🤬5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wikizoom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,441,574 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ویکی زوم” (@wikizoom), 7,371 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wikizoom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.