Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for wikiprop | ویکی پراپ

Channel

wikiprop | ویکی پراپ

@wikiprop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

9,929subscribers

-339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002353736963
TypeChannel
Username@wikiprop
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wikiprop

Growth

9,92910,26810,098.57 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,266 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,257 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,243 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,199 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,185 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,155 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,136 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,121 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,105 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,094 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,077 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,064 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,073 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,066 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,052 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,043 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,038 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,025 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,010 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,007 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,993 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,929 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 32 days, net -339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,878–10,319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 01:579,929-64
3 Sept 2026, 19:379,993-14
2 Sept 2026, 13:2810,007-3
1 Sept 2026, 15:1210,010-15
30 Aug 2026, 17:2410,025-13
29 Aug 2026, 17:0210,038-5
28 Aug 2026, 19:0710,043-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:3710,052-14
26 Aug 2026, 18:1210,066-7
25 Aug 2026, 16:2310,073+18
24 Aug 2026, 19:2810,055-9
23 Aug 2026, 04:0810,064-13
21 Aug 2026, 19:0610,077-17
20 Aug 2026, 16:0510,094-11
19 Aug 2026, 12:5310,105-16
18 Aug 2026, 15:0210,121-15
17 Aug 2026, 11:3210,136-19
15 Aug 2026, 20:4410,155-30
14 Aug 2026, 09:2510,185-14
13 Aug 2026, 01:0610,199first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 9,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held26 (17 June 202627 August 2026)
Views total12,647
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,000 reactions across 25 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
65865.8%
👍18618.6%
👏373.70%
🙏353.50%
🔥343.40%
👀131.30%
😱90.9%
🤔70.7%
💯50.5%
🤨40.4%
👌20.2%
👨‍💻20.2%
🤩20.2%
🤯20.2%
10.1%
❤‍🔥10.1%
💔10.1%
🤝10.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 25 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wikiprop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC707 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🥸 ‏Certificate قبل از پرداخت؟! چند ماه پیش، یکی از گواهی‌های پرداخت ZoraFX با یک سؤال جدی روبه‌رو شد: ❓ ‏Tx Hash این پرداخت کجاست؟ ‏ZoraFX معمولاً فقط تصویر Certificate منتشر می‌کرد. اما بعد از ایجاد شدن حاشیه، برای یک مورد یک Hash ارائه شد. ⁉️ نکته عجیب اینجاست که تاریخ Certificate مربوط به یک روز قبل از تاریخ انتقال بوده. ⁉️ جالب‌تر اینکه انتقال حدود ۳ ساعت بعد از مطرح شدن این حاشیه انجام شده است. این زمان‌بن

👍158👨‍💻1🤔1

24 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,690 views75 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥸 گواهی برداشت SGB زیر ذره‌بین WikiProp؛ یک تراکنش مشکوک! یک گواهی برداشت با رقم بیش از ۳۰۰۰ دلار در کانال رسمی SGB Trading (سرمایه‌گذار برتر) منتشر شده. اما وقتی برای راستی‌آزمایی، تراکنش این گواهی رو روی BscScan بررسی کردیم، با مورد عجیبی مواجه شدیم: ⚠️ آدرس‌های مرتبط با تراکنش با برچسب Fake_Phishing نمایش داده می‌شوند. ⚠️ توکن منتقل‌شده نیز با هشدار Fake Token / Phish-Hack مشخص شده است. حالا یک سؤال مهم مطرح

42👍15😱9🤔6🤨2🙏1

23 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,670 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🥸 پیگیری Moneta Funded 2 روز از اطلاعیه Moneta Funded درباره توقف فعالیت با کاربران ایرانی گذشته و همچنان منتظر اطلاعیه تکمیلی این مجموعه درباره حساب‌های فعال، برداشت‌ها و نحوه ادامه فعالیت هستیم. در همین راستا، WikiProp موضوع را مستقیماً از Moneta پیگیری کرده و این پاسخ را دریافت کرده است: «نوتیسی که ما شبانه دریافت کردیم با ددلاین و بسیار جدی بوده و ما تمام فعالیت با ایران رو معلق کردیم چند دقیقه بعد از دریافت ن

15👍3🙏2

20 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,860 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥸 بررسی سابقه فعالیت Invest Prop در ادامه بررسی این هفته، امروز سراغ سابقه فعالیت Invest Prop رفتیم. بر اساس اطلاعاتی که در منابع عمومی قابل بررسی است: 🟢 دامنه Invest Prop دامنه invest-prop.com در تاریخ 25 دسامبر 2024 ثبت شده است. 🟢 صفحه اینستاگرام صفحه اینستاگرام مجموعه نیز از دسامبر 2024 فعالیت خود را آغاز کرده است. 🟢 کانال تلگرام کانال تلگرام مجموعه در فوریه 2026 ایجاد شده است. بنابراین، بر اساس ردپای عمومی

12👍2🙏1

17 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈2,030 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🥸 بررسی قوانین عمومی Invest Prop اولین قدم بررسی Invest Prop رو با قوانین عمومی شروع کردیم. در نگاه اول، چند نکته مثبت وجود داره: ✔️ ترید زمان خبر مجازه ✔️ مارتینگل به‌طور کامل ممنوع نیست ✔️ کپی‌ترید بین حساب‌های خود تریدر مجازه ✔️ برخی اکسپرت‌های مدیریت سرمایه مجاز هستن اما چند بند هم به نظر می‌رسه نیاز به شفاف‌سازی بیشتری دارن: ❓ معیار «سوءاستفاده از تأخیر» در زمان خبر دقیقاً مشخص نیست. ❓ الزام بررسی اطلاعیه‌ه

16👍2❤‍🔥1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈2,200 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥸 پرونده جدید WikiProp 🔎 ‏ Invest Prop وارد مرحله بررسی شد. در این پرونده، ویکی پراپ طی روزهای آینده ابعاد مختلف این مجموعه را بررسی خواهد کرد. مواردی که بررسی می‌شوند: • ساختار و اطلاعات حقوقی • سابقه فعالیت • قوانین معاملاتی • شرایط حساب‌ها • پرداخت سود • تجربه و شکایات کاربران • پشتیبانی • سایر موارد مرتبط با فعالیت مجموعه ✈️ اطلاعات اولیه این پرونده در ادامه بررسی تکمیل خواهد شد. اگر با Invest Prop تجربه‌ای

👍2115🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC≈2,490 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026

⚠️ هشدار WikiProp درباره MyProp ⚠️ با توجه به برخی اطلاعات و مواردی که در حال بررسی آن‌ها هستیم، نگرانی‌هایی درباره وضعیت نقدینگی MyProp برای ما ایجاد شده است. تا زمان تکمیل بررسی و شفاف شدن وضعیت، توصیه می‌کنیم: 🟢فعلاً چالش جدید از MyProp خریداری نکنید. 🟢در فعالیت جدید با این مجموعه احتیاط کنید. 🔈 بررسی WikiProp ادامه دارد و در صورت تأیید موارد مطرح‌شده، جزئیات را منتشر خواهیم کرد. 📱WIKIPROP

40👍11🙏4

4 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,660 views69 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥸 یه سؤال ساده از پراپ چک. چند وقت پیش اسم «فنفیکس» توی لیست کلمات فیلتر شده بود. یعنی کاربر حتی اسمش رو هم نمی‌تونست توی گروه بنویسه. اون موقع برداشت خیلی‌ها این بود که پراپ چک، فنفیکس رو یه مجموعه نامعتبر می‌دونه. حتی اجازه مطرح شدن اسمش هم وجود نداشت. 💬حالا یه سؤال پیش اومده. چی شد که امروز یکی از ادمین‌های پراپ چک، Ali Poursani، برداشت سود از فنفیکس منتشر کرده؟ فنفیکس بالاخره اسکم بود یا نبود؟ اگر اسکم نبود

45👍21🔥2🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈3,010 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🥸 Tick Tock...

👀137🔥2👨‍💻1

3 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,530 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

🥸 یک پرونده جدید در انتظار بررسی است. انتخاب شما، اولین مقصد ماست.

  1. invest-prop (اینوست پراپ)72%
  2. robinsood (رابین سود)36%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18🙏2👍1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC≈5,060 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥸 شرایط بازار فقط به نمودارها بستگی ندارد. اگر با یک پراپ فرم کار می‌کنی، الان وقتشه یه سؤال مهم از پشتیبانیش بپرسی. ❓ از پشتیبانی بپرسید اگر اینترنت ایران دچار اختلال گسترده شد، سیاست شما چیست؟ این سؤال‌ها را بپرسید. 🟢 آیا معاملات باز بدون مشکل مدیریت می‌شوند؟ 🟢 اگر به پنل دسترسی نداشته باشم، چه راه ارتباطی جایگزینی دارید؟ 🟢 آیا مدت زمان Challenge یا Evaluation متوقف یا تمدید می‌شود؟ 🟢 آیا پرداخت سود طبق روال ان

21👏5👍3🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈5,410 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🥸 نتیجه پیگیری شکایت های کاربران ویکی پراپ مدتی قبل اعلام کردیم اگر در همکاری با یک پراپ با مشکل روبه‌رو شدید، موضوع را برای ویکی پراپ ارسال کنید تا بررسی و پیگیری شود. در این مدت، تعدادی پرونده از سوی کاربران برای ما ارسال شد. هر پرونده به صورت جداگانه بررسی شد و در صورت نیاز با تیم پشتیبانی پراپ مربوطه در ارتباط بودیم. ✔️ خوشبختانه تمام مجموعه هایی که با آن ها مکاتبه داشتیم، همکاری کردند و مشکلات کاربران برطرف

37👍8🙏4🔥2💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @wikiprop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTCFinal Results349 voters

🥸 یک پرونده جدید در انتظار بررسی است. انتخاب شما، اولین مقصد ماست.

  1. invest-prop (اینوست پراپ)72%
  2. robinsood (رابین سود)36%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTCAnonymous Poll794 voters

📊 نظرسنجی ویکی پراپ | FundedNext در حال بررسی FundedNext هستیم و می‌خواهیم نظر کاربران واقعی این مجموعه را بدانیم.

  1. ✔️ پرداخت سود بدون مشکل5%
  2. ❓ متوسط ایراداتی داشت7%
  3. ❌ تجربه منفی داشتم عدم پرداخت سود6%
  4. فقط نتایج را می‌بینم 😎84%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“wikiprop | ویکی پراپ” (@wikiprop), 9,929 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wikiprop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.