Ты действительно прирождённый лидер и опора для всех, или же за твоим безупречным контролем скрывается банальный страх ошибки? ;) 🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨БАЗОВЫЙ_КОД 🎨🎨🎨 Старший ребёнок — это не «привилегия» и даже не статус, это первый тестовый полигон родителей. На него выгружают 100% своих нереализованных амбиций, неопытности и, увы, фоновой тревоги...кроме того, зачастую ему просто выдают эмоциональный грузовик с чужой ответстве…

Channel
WHY.Ü
@whyucommunity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,058subscribers
+67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003753100875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whyucommunity |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whyucommunity |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 1,058 | +35 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 1,023 | +32 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 991 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 991 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 99.9%
- avg views ÷ 1,058 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,060
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,130 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
Какая травма движет тобой? 💔
- ТРАВМА УТРАТЫ9%
- ТРАВМА ОТВЕРЖЕНИЯ41%
- ТРАВМА РАЗРЫВА ЗНАЧИМЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ22%
- ТРАВМА НАСИЛИЯ13%
- ВИКАРНАЯ ТРАВМА7%
- КОМПЛЕКСНАЯ ТРАВМА (К-ПТСР)31%
- ЕЩЕ РАЗБИРАЮСЬ28%
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Video, posted without a caption
Почему девочка, которую годами запирали в чулане, в итоге сожгла целый город, или как выглядит боль, которую годами никто не замечал ;) //Кэрри Уайт 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 Базовая симуляция среды: Кэрри живёт в мире, где безопасного места просто не существует. Дома её ждёт мать Маргарет — глубоко религиозная женщина, которая убеждена, что почти всё вокруг является грехом. За непослушание Кэрри бьют, за попытки быть обычным по…
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Ты действительно веришь, что твой жёсткий перфекционизм, вечный фоновый стыд, неумение расслабиться и привычка во всём винить себя — это просто «сложный характер» и «высокие требования к себе», или же тобой правит хроника детства, где не было физических стен, но откуда было абсолютно невозможно сбежать? ;) 🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨ЛОР ТРАВМЫ 🎨🎨🎨 В отличие от классического ПТСР, которое вспыхивает после разовой катастрофы (авария, тера…
Почему видео с чужой аварией или жёсткой дракой заставляет твоё тело сжиматься, а желудок завязываться в узел, будто сейчас бьют прямо тебя, или как мозг стирает границу между «я» и «другой» ;) //БАГ. ЭМПАТИЧЕСКИЙ РЕЗОНАНС. 🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨 СУТЬ БАГА 🎨🎨🎨 Внутренний код нашей нервной системы заточен под глубокую синхронизацию: мы биологически запрограммированы считывать и моментально проживать состояние человека рядом. В отли…
Почему ты снова и снова спасаешь чужих людей, хотя дело давно не в них, или как непрожитая детская беспомощность заставляет взрослого человека искать чужую боль, чтобы исцелить свою собственную ;) // Клариса Старлинг 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 Базовая симуляция среды: Клариса—стажёр Академии ФБР. Её отправляют собрать данные у заключенного Ганнибала Лектера для расследования о другом маньяке, Буффало Билле. Она читает материалы э…
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whyucommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая травма движет тобой? 💔
- ТРАВМА УТРАТЫ9%
- ТРАВМА ОТВЕРЖЕНИЯ41%
- ТРАВМА РАЗРЫВА ЗНАЧИМЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ22%
- ТРАВМА НАСИЛИЯ13%
- ВИКАРНАЯ ТРАВМА7%
- КОМПЛЕКСНАЯ ТРАВМА (К-ПТСР)31%
- ЕЩЕ РАЗБИРАЮСЬ28%
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 84,243 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@not_in_love · 9,8403 postsАбстрактные мемы для браузерных экономистов и стратегов всех сортов кажется
@realpotatonuts · 13,4873 postsмиллисекунда вечности помещённая в точку пространства
@lapkivtapk1 · 101 postКатарсис | Психология
@medullaoblongat · 12,5831 postтравма детства
@travdet · 11,8171 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WHY.Ü” (@whyucommunity), 1,058 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whyucommunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.