Channel
@whynot_xxxx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,791subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001961805444 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whynot_xxxx |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whynot_xxxx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 2,791 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 2,789 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 2,788 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 2,789 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 2,789 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (25 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,006 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Всем привет, я к вам с записью стрима в LT Немного актуализирую мысли относительно текущего ренжа, с учетом открытия месяца. Приятного просмотра! https://youtu.be/jNmdCKsms6M?si=8Zt0-OVHBnF8tf3T
Signed #whynot?
Какой то минус вайб на битке, но посмотрим. https://whynotentertainment.notion.site/btc-3a3885aca637801388d6dcdd23d1745e?source=copy_link
Signed #whynot?
Всем доброе утро. ЧМ закончился и мой небольшой перерыв тоже -> можно возвращаться к активным торгам. По BTC практически ничего не изменилось -> но я готовлю свою часть под маркет репорт в ЛТ, поэтому через час закину линку 😌
Signed #whynot?
Изначально я планировал выкатить пост про то, насколько косты на ОКХ повлияли на фактический результат внутридневной системы для бтс. Но я думаю, что вы и сами ощущаете на себе все прелести "доп платежей" на биржах. Стоит ли выкидывать деньги на ветер ? Вопрос конечно же риторический. Под вечер пятницы, я думаю достаточно описать то, что ОКХ готов выплачивать вам USDT за ваш торговый объем. Если вы являетесь нашим…
Signed #whynot?
Всем привет, прошлая неделя просто нудная. Ставка на то, что эта будет повеселее с самого старта. Единственное только то, что отчет от CFTC выйдет аж сегодня вечером, поэтому прям полностью мысли зафиксирую позже. Из дополнений: несмотря на локальный спайк шорт позиций, все равно нужно держать в уме long-term перекос по лонгам. Удачных торгов! https://whynotentertainment.notion.site/BTC-387885aca6378062a6d0f8e996…
Signed #whynot?
Доброе утро, если оно доброе. Небольшой upd по BTC. https://whynotentertainment.notion.site/btc-380885aca63780a4b5bad69f495ec63b?source=copy_link
Signed #whynot?
Выпал немного с активных публикаций в тг, потому что по бтс среднесрочных комментариев нету. За это время меня завело на скальп фонды, засетапил себе минутный спейс с тепловой картой, vwap ну и конечно же принтом. Сегодня чуть лонганул NQ + GC а еще получилось урвать шорт по бтс. Найс четверг получился. На этом можно и завершить неделю. Пацаны тестят во всю Ондо перпс кстати, как решение для торговли индексов/мета…
Signed #whynot?
Такой вот план пока что 🥺
Signed #whynot?
Время сделать апдейт по BTC. Прошли парочку системных сигналов по экстремальному перекосу в стакане на стороне Bid. Это внушает позитив в текущей точке, где самое главное не ошибиться с таймингом. Мы достигли -1 отклонение по VWAP за текущий год, цены дешевые как ни крути. Приток шортов в это падение -> приличное. Но обратите внимание, что в рамках зум-аута по лонг позициям, капитуляции так то и не было, несмотря …
Signed #whynot?
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed #whynot?
Добрый день, сегодня скорее всего без ютуба. Upd сделал в ноушин. Ближайшее сопротивление 78.5к Нейтральный отчет Слабый стакан Отскок за счет шорт сквиза а не новых позиций Фокус на 30drvwap https://whynotentertainment.notion.site/btc-36b885aca63780a283abe7767b7837e6?source=copy_link
Signed #whynot?
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @whynot_xxxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 219,570 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#WHNT?” (@whynot_xxxx), 2,791 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whynot_xxxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.