Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Whispers of Karasik

Channel

Whispers of Karasik

@whispersofkarasik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003510431480
TypeChannel
Username@whispersofkarasik
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/whispersofkarasik

Growth

495250.57 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–52 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:0652+3
10 Aug 2026, 12:1649no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:4849first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
145.2%
avg views ÷ 52 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.5
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,359
Reactions total151
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52246115069303520113221.2%
custom 54450908785216156942919.2%
custom 52264365244337674852113.9%
custom 52764381299668816961711.3%
custom 53663003777863655571711.3%
custom 5224461887449641545138.61%
custom 5231112575587992273138.61%
custom 528069503096770793395.96%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whispersofkarasik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC29 views6 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 ✨~как некоторым людям удается всегда быть вежливыми, добрыми и оптимистичными? я тоже не знаю, но знаю, почему эти люди так себя ведут. это действительно хорошая жизненная позиция: жить и излучать позитивные энергии. тема данного поста затронет пользу лояльного и дружелюбного отношения к миру и вещам вокруг. ✨~ни для кого не секрет, что все нас окружающее состоит из энергий. люди всегда были и явл

custom 54450908785216156943custom 52244618874496415452custom 52806950309677079331

5 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonQueBot

💖 У тебя новое сообщение! У меня вопрос по посту где выговорили про манифестацию на любовь. Я не понимаю как тут нарушается свобода другого человека, если манифестируя мы просто перемещаемся в ту реальность где версия этого человека испытывает к нам чувства, мы же не меняем человека, мы же просто сами перемещаем наше сознание на ту ветку реальности, где у того человека как бы сознание уже другое и мы ничего не наруш

custom 52246115069303520111custom 52764381299668816961

5 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC80 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

👾👾👾👾 хорошо, если вы хотите любви вашего жч не влияя на реальность, а просто меняя ее на ту, где человек вас любит, то тут тоже ничего хорошего вы не найдете) объясняю: в оригинальной версии человека, т.е. в текущей реальности, человек вас не любит. если вы хотите быть с этим человеком здесь, то придется манифестить и ломать ему волю. а если вы именно шифтитесь к той его версии, где он вас любит, то тоже расслаблять

custom 52264365244337674853custom 52764381299668816961custom 52806950309677079331custom 54450908785216156941

5 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC79 views13 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾 👾👾👾👾 👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 ✨~я добавила новую рубрику постов: психология. публиковаться в эту графу будут любые напоминания или те размышления, которые помогут напомнить вам о том, что не смотря на важность достижений и успехов, стоит следить и за своим внутренним состоянием. выгорания и усталость никто не отменял, а мои карасики достойны той поддержки и сил, которые я собираюсь вложить интенсивно именно в эту рубрику. тема

custom 52764381299668816968custom 52246115069303520112custom 54450908785216156942custom 52244618874496415451

3 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC64 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 ✨~основные энергии данного поста будут 😎😎 поговорим про возвышение шифтинга и его гиперболизирование через контроль и некоторые негативные установки касательно самого понятия. довольно прожеванная тема в сообществе, но об этом важно помнить даже тем, кто уже шифтился, повторение мать учения. ✨~это абсолютно нормально, если в вашей голове шифтинг оставил впечатление как о чем то божественном

custom 52244618874496415458custom 52264365244337674853custom 54450908785216156943custom 52806950309677079331

2 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonQueBot

💒 У тебя новое сообщение! В своём последнем посте вы упоминали манифестации на любовь. Касается ли это манифестации на проявление желаемого человека в жизни? Не обязательно кто-то конкретный, а лишь желаемые качества, внешность, образ и отношение человека. Слышала в этом опасение только в том, что если не все мелочи продумать, то возможен подвох в человеке, о котором не задумывались, хотя всё остальное устраивает

2 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC54 views9 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

👾👾👾👾 нет, не касается. вы можете наманифестить вашу встречу или другое какое либо пересечение/взаимодействие. вы не ломаете ничью волю, не искажаете чувства и не навязываете никому свою привязанность. в данном случае вы манифестите себе способы для привлечения внимания вашего желаемого человека, которое не подкрепляется никакими привязками. если это лишь образ вашего желаемого человека, а не конкретная персона, то е

custom 54450908785216156944custom 53663003777863655573custom 52311125755879922732

2 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC60 views9 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾 ✨~одна из самых провокационных тем на моем канале. я за максимальную честность перед своей аудиторией, поэтому делюсь своим отношением к подобным видам манифеста. ❗️упоминание ритуалистики и темы суицида❗️ ✨~манифест на любовь, отношения и в целом те виды манифестации, затрагивающие изменение чужой воли я не одобряю. и не общаюсь с людьми, что практикуют подобное, поскольку не могу давать себе

custom 52246115069303520115custom 53663003777863655572custom 54450908785216156942

2 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC50 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 ✨~поговорим о таком явлении, как ненамеренный шифтинг, почему он возникает и его особенности. ✨~"главный ключ к шифтингу это ваше намерение. без него не зашифтиться." чушь собачья. если вы осознанно садитесь и шифтитесь, то да, намерение должно присутствовать. но это не распространяется на всю теорию шифтинга в целом. скрытое намерение никто не отменял. его вы можете даже не осознавать. ✨~у кажд

custom 522461150693035201111custom 52264365244337674855custom 52806950309677079333custom 52244618874496415451

31 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC66 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 💜~особенная рубрика моих личных историй. сегодня поделюсь тем, как я впервые зашифтилась. вообще, это был первый осознанный шифт, подозреваю, что меня кидало стабильно в разные реальности во сне, но я особо этого не запоминала (как и по сей день, впрочем). и вот я ложусь спать и, если память не подводит, я вообще никуда шифтиться не собиралась тогда, но судьба решила иначе. оказалась я в игре пр

custom 536630037778636555710custom 52764381299668816962custom 52806950309677079332custom 52246115069303520111

30 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC80 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 👾👾 👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾👾 ✨~продолжаем затрагивать спорные вопросы. ситуации, когда таролог выдал вам ошибку или страктовал карты не так, как нужно было, существуют. и тут все дело в неопытности и неумении человека владеть картами. режке таролог может быть уставшим или встал не с той ноги, и тут снова ответственность несет гадающий, которому не стоило браться за расклад. но бывают и другие ситуации: таролог раз

custom 52764381299668816964custom 52264365244337674852custom 52244618874496415451custom 52246115069303520111custom 52311125755879922731custom 52806950309677079331

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whispersofkarasik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 424,872 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Whispers of Karasik” (@whispersofkarasik), 52 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whispersofkarasik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.