Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for love never ends

Channel

love never ends

@wherelovend

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,808subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742519797
TypeChannel
Username@wherelovend
Description№ 6870262717 канал с прайсом на рекламу и раскладами: https://t.me/tarotferruma по всем вопросам — @ferruma
Created18 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wherelovend

Growth

11,80811,93811,8736 August 2026 — 11,938 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,938 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,934 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,905 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,884 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,883 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,879 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,858 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,848 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,841 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,838 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,808 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,789–11,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:5911,808-30
16 Aug 2026, 04:5411,838-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:5411,841-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:4811,848-10
12 Aug 2026, 10:0611,858-21
11 Aug 2026, 09:1411,879-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:3211,883-1
9 Aug 2026, 06:4311,884-21
8 Aug 2026, 06:5311,905-29
7 Aug 2026, 05:1011,934-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:0611,938no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5811,938first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 11,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held33 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total40,285
Reactions total3,211
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27,100
Videos
2,990
Links
506

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,211 reactions across 33 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,94760.6%
💘40812.7%
❤‍🔥35411.0%
💋1554.83%
🔥702.18%
💅662.06%
💔571.78%
🍓511.59%
🙏381.18%
😍331.03%
😢300.934%
🥰20.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wherelovend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.03%
1 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,590
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,170
over 32 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeHGgmZ112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC695 views152 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

“нервничать — это мстить своему здоровью за глупость других”

114💘21🍓14💋2❤‍🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC977 views46 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

смотрю любимый сериал, пока работаю. все чаще сейчас сталкиваюсь со сбоями впн, что очень мешает.. проблема актуальная для всех, поэтому делюсь впн, который не подводит 💘 можно активировать бесплатных три дня, чтобы попробовать) всем хорошего дня!

28❤‍🔥12💋5💘1

16 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,090 views91 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

ходили на одиссею, это просто 1000/10 💔 впервые появилось желание повторно сходить в кино на один и тот же фильм..

58❤‍🔥26💘7

16 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC≈1,050 views144 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

уехать туда, где не ловит сеть >

106💘28🔥10

15 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,170 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🌟 дом луны - это селективный секонд, который собирает прекрасные изделия для современных городских Фей, Амазонок, Нимф и Волшебниц 🌟 💚 В моей лавке чудес можно найти: 👁️Галактическое платье из Франции для звёздных свершений 👁️Платье-леденец с эльфийскими рукавами 👁️Цветущее двухслойное платье с готическими нотками из Южной Кореи 👁️Винтажный пиджак с кружевными деталями 👁️Полупрозрачный лонгслив, который может вызва

13❤‍🔥2💘1

15 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC432 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

у меня целая коллекция платьев в гардеробе, как нибудь сделаю пост о них, планирую через 10 лет стать габи солис и жить в своей гардеробной.. сейчас нашла сказочное платье от американского бренда, которого уже не существует..🤲

💘20❤‍🔥42😍2

15 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC607 views99 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ранняя осень >>

57❤‍🔥24🙏15🍓2💘1

15 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC720 views69 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @moonmagazinPhoto

🤩▫️

💘4419❤‍🔥6

15 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC945 views148 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

100% an autumn person 🕯🥞📚

❤‍🔥8739💘21🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,320 views122 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ну какую красоту создала 💔

76😍30💘16

13 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,470 views167 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ощущение легкости и предвкушения, когда собираешься в новое путешествие >>

107💋29🍓16💘7❤‍🔥3💔3🥰2

13 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,460 views144 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

как должно начинаться мое утро, чтобы меня ничего не бесило.. 🦭

82❤‍🔥44💘18

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @wherelovend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 837,613 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“love never ends” (@wherelovend), 11,808 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wherelovend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.