8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,415–1,456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 00:43
1,451
+1
24 Aug 2026, 02:39
1,450
+27
20 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,423
-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:38
1,425
+5
14 Aug 2026, 08:36
1,420
-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:31
1,421
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:03
1,422
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:31
1,422
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 1,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
275
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
6 (29 July 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
1,098
Reactions total
144
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
212 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
118
55.7%
👍
31
14.6%
😍
26
12.3%
😁
15
7.08%
🥰
10
4.72%
🔥
7
3.30%
🤩
5
2.36%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Уютное воскресенье 🌞❤️
Саша вернулся с гостинцами))) Привёз наши изделия, которые, помните, мы в мой день рождения на МК в студии керамики делали?
Я мастерила настенный подсвечник и маленькую русалку из остатков глины. Русалку планировала как подвеску, но передумала ей делать дырку в голове. И решила приклеить магнитик с обратной стороны. Теперь русалка живёт вместе с рыбой на холодильнике. Я не фанат магнитов, рыбо…
У нас неподалёку от дома есть пруд. Мы там очень часто гуляем. Недавно на нём было обнаружено очень красивое растение. Оно стелется по водной глади такими мелкими круглыми монетками, как кувшинки, только совсем маленькие листочки.
Сегодня в очередной раз, гуляя с соседкой, мы поразились красоте этого растения (оно ещё и зацвело) и начали фантазировать, как было бы классно его в свой сад поселить. Ну, и пошли развиват…
Такое со мной бывает раз в жизни 😁
Во-первых, я не пью кофе. Был период, когда не пила вообще несколько лет подряд. Потом в мою жизнь внезапно ворвался декаф (подруга подсадила). Но это было очень редко и временно. Пару лет как не пью кофе снова. И вот сегодня мне просто нестерпимо захотелось кофе+мороженого. Ладно. Хорошо. Надо же, и даже мороженое именно то самое оказалось в дальнем углу морозилки... Кто всё это по…
Я так люблю раннее-раннее утро, если, конечно, получается проснуться (что бывает очень редко, так как даётся мне с большим трудом). Вот то самое время, когда ещё нет никаких звуков. Разве что птиц слышно, а бывает, что и их голосов нет. Всё будто замерло, время остановилось. И всё вокруг как будто только для тебя. Чтобы услышать и понять что-то важное ✨
Вот и август подкрался...
#домвлесу
Помните, я делилась ссылкой на табурет, который поселился у нас на летней кухне?
Так вот, эта штука оказалась настолько удобной, что мы купили второй. Но мне захотелось в другом цвете. Подбирала под серые стены бани, а в итоге он так шикарно вписался и туда, и в дом, перкликаясь с принтом обоев и дверными наличниками, что, похоже, нужен теперь третий табурет)))
Что мне нравится в таких предметах — это их многофункци…
Всякое рандомное ❤️
Кстати, малышня — это новый выводок беличий)) Но уже где-то в деревьях гнездо было, я видела как мама-белка собирает канаты и тащит куда-то на верха.
#домвлесу
❤37
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @when_im_home. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Канал «Дом быта» @dmbt_media · 44,265 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
КАК ЖИВУТ ДРУГИЕ. Оля Качанова @kakzhivutdrugie · 66,413 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
Клуб zhenya_prorab @zhenya_prorab · 52,601 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник Вдохновения” (@when_im_home), 1,451 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/when_im_home.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.