Channel
@whatis_it
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,772subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001281121559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whatis_it |
| Created | 19 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whatis_it |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 1,772 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 1,770 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 1,769 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 1,769 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
137 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 33.6% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 30.7% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 5.11% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.92% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 2.92% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 1.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2023 to 26 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
И снова интересно о продажах. Теперь от Rubius. Но если честно, я бы с большим удовольствием почитал более развёрнуто об их кейсе для ПИК.
🔥6👌4❤3👍3
И вот такое нравится — не постеснялись и рассказали о какой-то, казалось бы, банальной херне.
А вот за такие настроения я люблю небольшие компании. Да, уже есть свои отдельные команды, которым отдельно тусить веселее, но ещё нет такого большого разрыва настроений, как это бывает в корпорациях. Если что, это не противопоставление, а поиск плюсов для каждого формата и периода. Всё-таки нужно понимать, что такие сборища — это не от того, что компания готова выделить миллион-полтора на тамаду и прочие дженги.
👍4👏2🤡2❤1
По привычке зашёл в блог Новео и даже нашёл там интересное — реально, если бы все аутсорсеры писали такие посты, пользы было больше, чем от их «сейчас мы вам покажем ёбаное ничего» — а потом подумал, стоит ли продолжать о них писать? Решил оставить в рамках того, что я сам же хотел писать чуть больше, чем про Сибирское IT.
И обратный пример — Труинжиринг считают, что это называется «показать кейс».
🤔4👍3🦄3
Насколько Чипса преуспела в загадочных шоурилах (сделать видео с летающей иконкой — Нолан отдыхает!), настолько они плохи в начале пути шаринга экспертизы текстом. Сравните с постом от Сибирикса из прошлого сообщения.
🤔2
О, интересная статья от Сибирикс. О том, в чём они реально разбираются. А то всё про дизайн да про ИИ.
👍6
А если не хотите на митап — поиграйте в шахматы. Рубиус 13 мая проводит турнир в Томске.
🤓3
Есть кто про бэкенд? Приходите завтра на митап Контура (19:00, Академпарк) Обещают интересное про масштабирование прав в проекте и переезд в opensource проект Спикеры Константин Аносов, старший инженер-программист, Контур Шлянин Сергей, разработчик, Яндекс.Практикум
👍7💩3😢1
Интересно, продержаться дольше, чем приложение Сбера? Ваши ставки?
😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @whatis_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“What is IT?” (@whatis_it), 1,772 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatis_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.