Channel
@whateverpr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
146subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001611569336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whateverpr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whateverpr |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 146 | -3 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 149 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 148 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 146 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 146 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 11 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 49 | 40.2% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 23.0% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 13.1% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 5.74% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.74% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 2.46% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2025 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Самый красивый проект в прошлом году - изделия для ресторана «Объект культурного наследия», реализованный совместно с Futura Archaica (futura_workshop) В основном работа с металлом, светом и смолой. Большое количество экспериментов: с эпоксидной смолой, элементами составов для воронения стали, различных технических и конструктивных особенностей.
👍9🔥6👏4❤1💘1
Слышали эту фразу: «Кони - лохи!»? Не знаю, про каких именно коней так говорят, наверняка есть и такие экземпляры, но эти, яркие и гладкие жеребцы точно из другой упряжки. Филигранно вырезаны, кропотно отшлифованны и усердно окрашены.. К слову, «окрашены» - форма кратного страдательного причастия прошедшего времени.. Действительно, я кратно страдал и был причастен и все это уже в прошедшем времени.. Но тут пришл…
🔥12👍5😁5❤4🌚1🤪1
Проблема нехватки свободных розеток решена! Так как тройники не всегда спасают ситуацию, Экспериментальное бюро Германа Фальчевского предлагает альтернативное решение – «двенадцатерник» с техническим названием «кубсрозетками-12», то есть в него можно воткнуть 12 вилок, причем одновременно! Привет, Артемию. Кубы, кстати, уехали на «ньюстаркэпм», вроде. Да и не я их придумал.
👍12🔥7😁2
Signed newme
Много чего натворили красивого за последнее время. Фоун уже сам начал подкидывать видосы, не может держать в себе столько красоты.
❤7🔥5⚡2
Signed Ger
У нас очередное обновление. Подъехал мега сварочный аппарат. Тестируем, разбираемся с настройками. Варит чернуху, алюминий, медь и даже картошку.
🔥11⚡5✍3
Signed Ger
Не сразу понял, кто эти ребята - «изионисты». Их сообщество про то, что все можно делать «на изи». Я понял другое, когда проект кажется совсем простым и времени на реализацию с запасом, - не стоит доверять этому обманчивому чувству, где то ждет подвох и придется не спать полутора суток. Но ведь красиво получилось?
🔥8💯5❤4👍2
Signed Ger
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @whateverpr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whatever Pro” (@whateverpr), 146 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whateverpr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.