Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐“ฆ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฝ๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐““๐“ธ๐“ฒ๐“ท'๐“ก๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ซ๐“ฒ? ๐“‘๐“ธ๐“ธ๐“ด ๐“๐“ป๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ฒ๐“ฟ๐“ฎ

Channel

๐“ฆ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฝ๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐““๐“ธ๐“ฒ๐“ท'๐“ก๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ซ๐“ฒ? ๐“‘๐“ธ๐“ธ๐“ด ๐“๐“ป๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ฒ๐“ฟ๐“ฎ

@whatchadoinrabbibooks

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

3,813subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001492683438
TypeChannel
Username@whatchadoinrabbibooks
Created8 April 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/whatchadoinrabbibooks

Topic

Politics & activism โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8133,8443,828.56 August 2026 โ€” 3,844 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 3,843 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 3,835 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 3,841 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 3,839 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 3,831 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 3,824 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 3,819 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 3,816 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 3,818 subscribers5 September 2026 โ€” 3,817 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 3,815 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 3,813 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 3,808โ€“3,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:203,813-2
10 Sept 2026, 09:583,815-2
5 Sept 2026, 12:403,817-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:553,818+2
29 Aug 2026, 17:543,816-3
26 Aug 2026, 21:253,819-5
23 Aug 2026, 12:043,824-7
19 Aug 2026, 23:413,831-8
16 Aug 2026, 18:083,839-2
13 Aug 2026, 09:563,841+6
10 Aug 2026, 05:143,835-8
7 Aug 2026, 12:063,843-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:003,844first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ’ฏ4024.2%
๐Ÿ‘3320.0%
๐Ÿคฌ2515.2%
โค2112.7%
๐Ÿ‘Ž127.27%
๐Ÿ”ฅ74.24%
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚74.24%
๐Ÿ‘Œ63.64%
โšก53.03%
๐Ÿคฃ42.42%
๐Ÿ˜21.21%
๐Ÿค”21.21%
๐Ÿซก10.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Mar 2026, 20:18 UTCโ‰ˆ2,210 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If God judges anything, it is allowing a single jew to live in your territory. The devil and the jew are exactly interchangeable in every conceivable way.

๐Ÿ‘31๐Ÿ‘Œ4๐Ÿ’ฏ4โค3๐Ÿ‘Ž3

Signed Prentice Al

12 Mar 2026, 20:10 UTCโ‰ˆ1,930 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ancient mudhut peasant thinking. A god judges nothing. Collectives of people simply cause the degradation and fall of a country or a people, either through shortsightedness or greed or some other collective action or plan. No need for this mystical interpretation of events. We can understand all of these things with plain direct explanations. All that is required is paying attention. God doesn't do coin clipping. Godโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ’ฏ10โšก3๐Ÿ‘Ž2

Signed Prentice Al

12 Mar 2026, 20:03 UTCโ‰ˆ1,690 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

God will judge a country for being "sinful" but not the jews who tirelessly work to make it so, for generations. We have to judge them. Strange doctrines.

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚6๐Ÿ‘Ž3โšก2๐Ÿ‘2

Signed Prentice Al

12 Mar 2026, 15:17 UTCโ‰ˆ1,490 viewsread 8 August 2026

New happening pasta 1. Cali & Ny: don't drone me iranybros 2. Iran to target banks in the ME Friday 13th of March is 6 years since covyid kicked off

Signed Prentice Al

12 Mar 2026, 14:13 UTCโ‰ˆ1,360 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

You can call women deranged or evil, but you must then admit that women, at minimum, have as much agency as men, if not more. One must have agency to be "evil". Or you can just admit that was the design from the beginning. Nature rewards the most manly men. Not the kindest or gentlest. But the men who conquer and win.

โค2๐Ÿ‘Ž1

Signed Prentice Al

12 Mar 2026, 14:07 UTCโ‰ˆ1,270 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

What people group started Christianity? And what particular behavior is that people group famous for? Inversion?

๐Ÿ”ฅ7

Signed Prentice Al

12 Mar 2026, 14:04 UTCโ‰ˆ1,400 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If Christianity commands that men "put on tender mercies, kindness, humility, meekness, longsuffering, gentleness", etc Why do we find in reality that women have an unbridled desire to find and mate with the most vicious and powerful men (serial killers, really?), why don't kind, gentle men make them horny? Why would nature punish what nature's god commands?

๐Ÿ’ฏ4

Signed Prentice Al

11 Mar 2026, 22:36 UTCโ‰ˆ1,070 viewsread 8 August 2026

Assassinations are a different matter and not within the scope of these comments.

Signed Prentice Al

11 Mar 2026, 22:31 UTC999 viewsread 8 August 2026

A republic with tariffs as the US was in the 1800s was always destined to fail. It was a contradiction in incentives, as the 30 years prior to, and the civil war, itself, showed. With free trade (democracy), the merchant class is incentivized to buy off the representatives of representative government because it is so easy to do so. Power is spread out. No one person has enough responsibility for the end result, for โ€ฆ

Signed Prentice Al

11 Mar 2026, 19:34 UTC794 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If you had to define the right wing in a word, that word would be hierarchy. If you're not working on getting toward the top of it, you don't believe in hierarchy. You believe in equality, so it doesn't matter where you are in it.

โค6๐Ÿ’ฏ3๐Ÿค”2

Signed Prentice Al

11 Mar 2026, 18:06 UTC811 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

You're not right wing if you don't exercise.

๐Ÿ’ฏ14๐Ÿคฃ4๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚1๐Ÿซก1

Signed Prentice Al

11 Mar 2026, 01:09 UTC842 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I don't ever want to hear the argument that you can't have morality without the Christian god again tbh

โค8๐Ÿ’ฏ5๐Ÿ‘Ž1

Signed Prentice Al

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @whatchadoinrabbibooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr John B.
@DrJohnB ยท 21,535
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here โ€” alongside 84 others โ€” read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐“ฆ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฝ๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐““๐“ธ๐“ฒ๐“ท'๐“ก๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ซ๐“ฒ? ๐“‘๐“ธ๐“ธ๐“ด ๐“๐“ป๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ฒ๐“ฟ๐“ฎโ€ (@whatchadoinrabbibooks), 3,813 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatchadoinrabbibooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.