If God judges anything, it is allowing a single jew to live in your territory. The devil and the jew are exactly interchangeable in every conceivable way.
๐31๐4๐ฏ4โค3๐3
Signed Prentice Al

Channel
@whatchadoinrabbibooks
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
3,813subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001492683438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whatchadoinrabbibooks |
| Created | 8 April 2021 โ measured โ cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whatchadoinrabbibooks |
Politics & activism โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 3,813 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 3,815 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 3,817 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 3,818 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 3,816 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 3,819 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 3,824 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 3,831 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 3,839 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 3,841 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 3,835 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 3,843 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 3,844 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
165 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฏ | 40 | 24.2% | |
| ๐ | 33 | 20.0% | |
| ๐คฌ | 25 | 15.2% | |
| โค | 21 | 12.7% | |
| ๐ | 12 | 7.27% | |
| ๐ฅ | 7 | 4.24% | |
| ๐คทโโ | 7 | 4.24% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 3.64% | |
| โก | 5 | 3.03% | |
| ๐คฃ | 4 | 2.42% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 1.21% | |
| ๐ค | 2 | 1.21% | |
| ๐ซก | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If God judges anything, it is allowing a single jew to live in your territory. The devil and the jew are exactly interchangeable in every conceivable way.
๐31๐4๐ฏ4โค3๐3
Signed Prentice Al
Ancient mudhut peasant thinking. A god judges nothing. Collectives of people simply cause the degradation and fall of a country or a people, either through shortsightedness or greed or some other collective action or plan. No need for this mystical interpretation of events. We can understand all of these things with plain direct explanations. All that is required is paying attention. God doesn't do coin clipping. Godโฆ
๐ฏ10โก3๐2
Signed Prentice Al
God will judge a country for being "sinful" but not the jews who tirelessly work to make it so, for generations. We have to judge them. Strange doctrines.
๐คทโโ6๐3โก2๐2
Signed Prentice Al
New happening pasta 1. Cali & Ny: don't drone me iranybros 2. Iran to target banks in the ME Friday 13th of March is 6 years since covyid kicked off
Signed Prentice Al
You can call women deranged or evil, but you must then admit that women, at minimum, have as much agency as men, if not more. One must have agency to be "evil". Or you can just admit that was the design from the beginning. Nature rewards the most manly men. Not the kindest or gentlest. But the men who conquer and win.
โค2๐1
Signed Prentice Al
What people group started Christianity? And what particular behavior is that people group famous for? Inversion?
๐ฅ7
Signed Prentice Al
If Christianity commands that men "put on tender mercies, kindness, humility, meekness, longsuffering, gentleness", etc Why do we find in reality that women have an unbridled desire to find and mate with the most vicious and powerful men (serial killers, really?), why don't kind, gentle men make them horny? Why would nature punish what nature's god commands?
๐ฏ4
Signed Prentice Al
Assassinations are a different matter and not within the scope of these comments.
Signed Prentice Al
A republic with tariffs as the US was in the 1800s was always destined to fail. It was a contradiction in incentives, as the 30 years prior to, and the civil war, itself, showed. With free trade (democracy), the merchant class is incentivized to buy off the representatives of representative government because it is so easy to do so. Power is spread out. No one person has enough responsibility for the end result, for โฆ
Signed Prentice Al
If you had to define the right wing in a word, that word would be hierarchy. If you're not working on getting toward the top of it, you don't believe in hierarchy. You believe in equality, so it doesn't matter where you are in it.
โค6๐ฏ3๐ค2
Signed Prentice Al
You're not right wing if you don't exercise.
๐ฏ14๐คฃ4๐1๐คทโโ1๐ซก1
Signed Prentice Al
I don't ever want to hear the argument that you can't have morality without the Christian god again tbh
โค8๐ฏ5๐1
Signed Prentice Al
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @whatchadoinrabbibooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ช๐ฝ๐ฌ๐ฑ๐ช๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐ท'๐ก๐ช๐ซ๐ซ๐ฒ? ๐๐ธ๐ธ๐ด ๐๐ป๐ฌ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎโ (@whatchadoinrabbibooks), 3,813 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatchadoinrabbibooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.