Channel
@whalekingestafador
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001687688000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whalekingestafador |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 December 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whalekingestafador |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 23 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A esta lista tengo que añadir a https://t.me/alwayswin_gratis este es el canal de donde varios reenvian señales, como CriptoKuz, la diferencia esbque acá la suscripción es de 10 usdt por 3 meses y en CriptoKuz es de 19 usdt y las señales llegan más tarde que en Always Win.
Es de ese canal de telegram, cualquiera que les pida dinero para algun fondo, pool o manejar tu cuenta es un estafador.
https://t.me/cryptofreepublic
Otro estafador, a tener cuidado
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Y atentos con este es conocido en tiktok no tiene enlaces em si grupo, solo desde su tiktok, opera muy pocas criptomonedas, en un inicio solo operaba en BTC y apalancado a 125. Por lo que parecia que ganaba mucho, hasta que empezo las caidas y al ver quejas empezo a decir solo 5x o max 10x.
Canales de señales gratis que dan buena rentabilidad: https://t.me/CryptoCapy (muestra resumen de ganancias de cada mes en pdf - es gratis sin VIP) https://t.me/InvestingBullsSignal (no muestra resumem de entradas, es gratis sin VIP) https://t.me/infinitocriptoCanal (muestra resumen de entrads al final del mes, es gratis pero tmbn tiene grupo VIP) https://t.me/Crypto_Tigers1 (canal de análisis gratis)
Ya nada más entrar, al costado de su nombre sale estafa porque ha sido reportado por varias personas en telegram.
Por si reciben mensaje de esta persona, es otro estafador que pide dinero para un fondo: https://t.me/elliotradescrypto @EllioTradesCryptoC (otro estafador que pode dinero para un fondo)
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @whalekingestafador. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quieren que les comparta canales confiables de debate y señales?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2021 to 7 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@whalekingestafador named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WHALEKING ES ESTAFA” (@whalekingestafador), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whalekingestafador.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.