اگە عکاس و تصویربردار هستی و برای پروژه هات به نرم افزار مدیریت قرارداد نیاز داری کانال زیر رو دنبال کن. @modir20_ir

Channel
وال استودیو
@whale_s
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,476subscribers
-2,104 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001007568150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whale_s |
| Description | وال استودیو در پیامرسان بله http://ble.ir/whale_s ثبت سفارش و مشاوره @saeed_hoseyni |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whale_s |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 00:54 | 29,476 | -36 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 29,512 | -34 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:18 | 29,546 | -23 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:45 | 29,569 | -32 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:07 | 29,601 | -28 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:09 | 29,629 | -37 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:39 | 29,666 | -25 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:56 | 29,691 | -30 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 29,721 | -36 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:15 | 29,757 | -22 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 29,779 | -28 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 29,807 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 29,825 | -21 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 29,846 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:31 | 29,862 | -22 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 29,884 | -20 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:34 | 29,904 | -28 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 29,932 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 29,954 | -24 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 29,978 | first reading |
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 169 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.11%
- avg views ÷ 29,476 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 326
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (1 June 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 978 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 12:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,940
- Videos
- ≈7
- Links
- ≈606
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
وال استودیو pinned «»
Posted without readable text
وال استودیو pinned «سفارش طراحی لوگو و هویت بصری @saeed_hoseyni»
سفارش طراحی لوگو و هویت بصری @saeed_hoseyni
Posted without readable text
وال استودیو pinned a photo
سفارش لوگوتو ثبت کن، طراحی ست اداری رو هدیه از ما بگیر
Posted without readable text
وال استودیو pinned «»
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @whale_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @whale_s as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 47 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Ai_Academi · 39,2541 postIllustrator_anesa
@amozeshgraphh · 30,8811 postمجله | خلاقیت، بدون مرز
@AR_NOSRATI · 48,8031 postArchitect City
@Architect_City · 50,9441 postدورکاری لند | مرکز فریلنسر ها
@DorkariLand · 53,3911 postفونت برتر
@FontBartar · 113,9041 postFreelancer
@freelancer_1377 · 161 postغرفه فریلنسر های فعال | استخدام
@freelancer_booth · 42,2311 postخانه هنر و گرافیک
@g_v_h · 69,1401 postپروژه دانشجویی| فریلنسری
@home_proje · 21,3251 postHtml and Css & Jsآموزش
@htmlcss_channels · 22,7151 postآی دورکار | فریلنسرهای حرفه ای
@idorkar · 33,5201 postiGraphical
@iGraphical · 66,2711 postکانال تبادلات لیستی پایا✌️
@Paya_Tab · 121 postژست برتر عکاسی
@positionn · 68,7331 post👑Preset/LUT👑
@preset_lut_ss · 30,8241 postپروژه لنسر | پاتوق دورکاری فریلنسرها
@ProzheLancer · 40,9161 postلایه باز گرام
@psd_gram · 64,7761 post💎PSD Land💎
@psdLandchannel · 32,7261 postTadwingaran |تدوینگران|
@tadwingaran · 43,6331 postیو پروژه | دورکاری - فریلنسرها
@uprojeh · 24,5931 postVectorinoo
@vectorinoo_ir · 371 postVoxel studios Learning
@VoxelLearn · 30,3871 postVoxel Studios Postproduction
@Voxelproduction · 46,6311 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@FontBartar · 113,9048 postsiGraphical
@iGraphical · 66,2718 postsمرکز آموزش کامپیوتر
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,8557 postsAndroid Developers
@Android0to100 · 62,3617 posts📱android_best
@android_best · 44,7157 postsComputer & IT Engineering
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 189,5807 postsپشتیبان ادیتور کلاب
@editorclub · 2,0817 postsپشتیبان فونتس کلاب
@fontsclub · 4,3927 postsProgramming <-> برنامه نویسی
@Amozesh_4u · 30,0906 postsBeat | Instrumental
@Beatt98 · 7,6286 postsدستورات ترموکس - ᴛᴇʀᴍᴜx
@Bia2Termux · 9,3216 postsبیمکس ارشـیو | 𝐁𝐦𝐚𝐱𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐯𝐞
@bmaxarchive · 18,6676 postsبیمکس دیزایــن | 𝐁𝐦𝐚𝐱𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧
@bmaxdesign · 28,6266 posts️Mechanical 3Design Accademy™آکادمی طراحی سه بعدی و نقشه کشی صنعتی،مهندسی مکانیک - ساخت و تولید- ماشین سازی
@cad_3d · 22,2796 postsگروه معماری چهارسوق
@CHAHAR_SOOGH_archi_gp · 14,9706 postsArras and Design
@Design_groooup · 12,6166 postsمهندسی کامپیوتر
@devloper98 · 12,6226 postsEngineeringReverse | مهندسی معکوس
@EngineeringReverse · 21,7086 postsEnglish Unique | آموزش زبان انگلیسی
@english_uniquee · 19,3996 postsخانه هنر و گرافیک
@g_v_h · 69,1406 postsʜᴀᴄᴋ 4҉҈ ᴍᴀɴ
@Hack4Man · 7,9476 postsفونت گرام
@i_font · 120,4486 posts• ɪɴꜰᴏ ᴅɪɢɪᴛᴀʟ •
@info_digital66 · 9,7276 postsVPN || PROXY
@iran_vpn66 · 7,6376 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 4
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@whale_s named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@AlloFont · 63,564#1
@bmaxdesign · 28,626#2
@iGraphical · 66,271#3
@graphicu · 45,538#4
@graphicL · 67,386#5
@DiakoGraphic · 19,188#6
@ghalamoom · 16,824#7
@nicecoderscom · 24,734#8
@tarah_show · 19,593#9
@amozeshgraphh · 30,881#10
@g_v_h · 69,140#11
@uigraphic · 33,865#12
@video_footage · 43,643#13
@pendareparsi · 15,058#14
@Architect_City · 50,944#15
@Freelaancing · 30,137#16
@rahavector · 37,320#17
@thedesigny · 3,939#18
@graphhit · 4,925#19
@rahagfx · 68,757#20
@aymahart · 6,539#21
@FontBartar · 113,904#22
@moein_photographer · 24,971#23
@TAHA_ARTWORK · 18,126#24
@FreelancerEN · 36,305#25
@VaeziArt · 3,206#26
@preset_lut_ss · 30,824#27
@TAHA_ARTWORK2 · 8,792#28
@kalame_font · 11,035#29
@ipschannel · 84,244#30
@Artshan_ir · 19,871#31
@limostudy · 51,527#32
@max_studio_group · 4,060#33
@Designers_archive · 2,291#34
@proxymtmax · 4,627#35
@AR_NOSRATI · 48,803#36
@rahapsd · 54,209#37
@hendounecom · 10,652#38
@aHalfDollar · 2,162#39
@sorenagfx · 46,398#40
@freepiker_ir · 13,015#41
@i_font · 120,448#42
@psd_gram · 64,776#43
@bmaxarchive · 18,667#44
@Seyyed_typography · 12,876#45
@CCina_Design · 70,983#46
@herfeyi_ha · 18,116#47
@psdLandchannel · 32,726#48
@AloFreelancer · 34,493#49
@shariatifar_tel · 26,388#50
@shirclub · 5,105#51
@AloJobs · 32,867#52
@Amir_graf · 15,080#53
@heyaatyar · 26,907#54
@Ahmadi_Farzane · 33,995#55
@aminsanayei · 44,292#56
@ProzheLancer · 40,916#57
@cproje · 30,561#58
@Free_mockups · 18,841#59
@theehsanez · 9,328#60
@Cyrus_Graphic · 9,824#61
@GraphicKhazer · 12,614#62
@etodayn · 4,061#63
@Asregraphic · 21,769#64
@ZFreelancer · 28,743#65
@Graphicaj · 4,048#66
@tarhemajazi · 8,293#67
@rahavfx · 39,270#68
@Fontfarsi_ir · 7,786#69
@negarpsd · 54,820#70
@WhatFreeFont · 16,135#71
@kariabi_tehran · 9,760#72
@bestgraphir · 1,307#73
@painting_honar · 5,295#74
@fontiran · 3,284#75
@Tarahan_Home · 37,965#76
@idorkar · 33,520#77
@mockupy · 1,588#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@preset_lut_ss · 30,824
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 6 September 2026
@graphicu · 45,538
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 August 2026
@uoffice · 26,862
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
@nicecoderscom · 24,734
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@Architect_City · 50,944
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
@rahavector · 37,320
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@moein_photographer · 24,971
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
@AlloFont · 63,564
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
@limostudy · 51,527
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@g_v_h · 69,140
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@psdLandchannel · 32,726
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
@iGraphical · 66,271
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@negarpsd · 54,820
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
@amozeshgraphh · 30,881
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@rahagfx · 68,757
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@sorenagfx · 46,398
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 August 2026
@graphicL · 67,386
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@aminsanayei · 44,292
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
@video_footage · 43,643
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@Ahmadi_Farzane · 33,995
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@FreelancerEN · 36,305
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
@AloJobs · 32,867
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@Mrkhalaq · 21,406
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
@Freelaancing · 30,137
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وال استودیو” (@whale_s), 29,476 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whale_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.