Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Whale Hub πŸ‹

@whale_hub

3 usernames

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

20,561subscribers

-192 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171899024
TypeChannel
Usernames@whale_hub @whalehub0007 @whalehub_007
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/whale_hub

Growth

20,56120,75320,6577 August 2026 β€” 20,753 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 20,753 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 20,750 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 20,745 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 20,732 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 20,729 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 20,726 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 20,714 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 20,688 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 20,688 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 20,678 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 20,658 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 20,651 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 20,648 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 20,632 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 20,617 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 20,617 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 20,604 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 20,594 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 20,594 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 20,596 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 20,580 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 20,568 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 20,561 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 7 days, net -192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,532–20,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:5420,561-7
14 Aug 2026, 09:4520,568-12
14 Aug 2026, 00:0820,580-16
13 Aug 2026, 08:4720,596+2
12 Aug 2026, 21:5820,594no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:2520,594-10
12 Aug 2026, 09:3220,604-13
11 Aug 2026, 20:1320,617no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:5420,617-15
11 Aug 2026, 09:0720,632-16
10 Aug 2026, 21:2720,648-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:5520,651-7
10 Aug 2026, 12:1220,658-20
9 Aug 2026, 22:3120,678-10
9 Aug 2026, 17:4320,688no change
9 Aug 2026, 12:3320,688-26
8 Aug 2026, 20:3420,714-12
8 Aug 2026, 15:1720,726-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:3520,729-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:3520,732first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 May 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

768 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯13417.4%
🐳11715.2%
❀11414.8%
❀‍πŸ”₯11014.3%
πŸ’―9212.0%
πŸ†658.46%
🀩486.25%
😍324.17%
πŸ‘202.60%
πŸ₯°202.60%
πŸŽ‰162.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 768reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2025 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
221
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 12 we hold a reading for Β· 100%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @whale_hub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2025 to 15 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Feb 2026, 06:12 UTCβ‰ˆ13,200 views85 reactions9 Starsread 14 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🐳22πŸ’―17❀14πŸ”₯6πŸ₯°6😍5❀‍πŸ”₯4πŸŽ‰4

5 Feb 2026, 07:51 UTCβ‰ˆ11,600 views67 reactions20 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

50/50 Signals With Private Support βœ”οΈ Contact @Henrymars πŸ’΅

❀16πŸ’―10πŸ†9🐳8🀩4πŸ₯°4😍4❀‍πŸ”₯3

3 Feb 2026, 15:10 UTCβ‰ˆ12,500 views93 reactions8 Starsread 14 August 2026
Video

Bitcoin Panic Sell LIVE | Watch what happens next πŸ‘€ Join us for 50/50 @henrymars

πŸ†15😍12🐳11❀10πŸ’―10❀‍πŸ”₯8πŸ”₯7πŸ₯°7

11 Nov 2025, 17:31 UTCβ‰ˆ20,400 views41 reactions7 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

We Captured From the bottom βœ”οΈ

❀‍πŸ”₯17❀10🐳9πŸ”₯3πŸ’―2

26 Oct 2025, 18:29 UTCβ‰ˆ18,400 views53 reactions12 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

We are Back to the game πŸ”₯

❀‍πŸ”₯22🐳13❀8πŸ’―5😍5

7 Aug 2025, 04:18 UTCβ‰ˆ23,600 views58 reactions21 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

We Achieve Significant Gains in 50/50 Calls . πŸ•― DM @Henrymars

❀‍πŸ”₯22πŸ”₯13🐳9❀6πŸ’―5πŸ₯°3

2 Jul 2025, 17:19 UTCβ‰ˆ22,800 views146 reactions17 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Pumping Money With 50/50 Position πŸ’΅ @Henrymars

πŸ†41🀩38πŸ”₯31🐳18❀11πŸŽ‰3πŸ’―3❀‍πŸ”₯1

29 Jun 2025, 23:16 UTCβ‰ˆ17,600 views107 reactions22 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

50/50 Profit Sharing Crypto Signal Program How it works: You trade with your own funds (up to $5,000 USDT to $1M USDT ). We provide full signals: entry, stop-loss, leverage, take-profit. Profit is shared 50/50 β€” you pay us only after you profit. If a trade goes to loss, we will recover that loss before taking the next 50% share. Contact @Henrymars

πŸ”₯39πŸ’―38❀‍πŸ”₯12🐳10❀6πŸŽ‰1πŸ‘1

23 May 2025, 11:59 UTCβ‰ˆ13,800 views37 reactions27 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

@Henreymas

❀‍πŸ”₯15🐳9❀4πŸ”₯3😍3πŸ’―2πŸ‘1

16 May 2025, 13:00 UTCβ‰ˆ17,000 views25 reactions7 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

βœ”οΈ

❀16πŸ‘6πŸ”₯2❀‍πŸ”₯1

16 May 2025, 09:40 UTCβ‰ˆ16,200 views28 reactions40 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Today We Pumped #Syrup βœ”οΈ Our 50/50 Program Accuracy πŸ€‘πŸ’΅ For Join @Henreymas

πŸ”₯13❀6🐳5❀‍πŸ”₯3😍1

16 May 2025, 08:28 UTCβ‰ˆ14,500 views28 reactions31 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Another Successful Personal Trade πŸ’΅ For Join @Henreymas

πŸ”₯14❀7🐳3❀‍πŸ”₯2😍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @whale_hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions β€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 280,187 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œWhale Hub πŸ‹β€ (@whale_hub), 20,561 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whale_hub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.