15 measurements spanning 6 days, net -347. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,709–37,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:06
36,761
-27
12 Aug 2026, 03:32
36,788
-32
11 Aug 2026, 13:43
36,820
-8
11 Aug 2026, 06:12
36,828
-28
10 Aug 2026, 15:32
36,856
-13
10 Aug 2026, 07:18
36,869
-26
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
36,895
-39
9 Aug 2026, 06:45
36,934
-33
8 Aug 2026, 10:50
36,967
-10
8 Aug 2026, 06:00
36,977
-59
7 Aug 2026, 13:41
37,036
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:38
37,036
-52
6 Aug 2026, 10:40
37,088
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:30
37,088
-20
6 Aug 2026, 01:49
37,108
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 2 June 2017 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
1
Videos
6
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10m 45s
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54,911 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🐳
28,081
51.1%
✍
12,384
22.6%
🤝
5,880
10.7%
😍
3,787
6.90%
⚡
1,645
3.00%
😎
1,297
2.36%
😁
995
1.81%
🗿
842
1.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,911reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2017 to 15 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
796
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 11 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
163
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whale_hanter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2017 to 15 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
• همکاری رسمی والچنل x صرافی توبیت! 💰
➖➖➖➖➖➖
🚶♂️ بهعنوان اولین و بزرگترین پارتنر رسمی ایران، تونستیم جوایز و بونوسهای انحصاری براتون بگیریم. جوایزی که تنها متعلق به کاربران والچنل هستند و شامل هیچ مجموعه دیگهای نخواهند شد. 🥂
➖➖➖➖➖➖
💰 24,000 دلار جایزه نقدی بههمراه آیفون 16 پرو مکس و جوایز فیزیکی جذاب دیگه!📱
» لینک مستقیم ورود به رویداد
• لیست کامل جوایز و حجم:
گلکسی واچ سامسونگ – 50M
آیپد 10 – 100M
مک بوک …
این تایم های اخیر ولت تون کیپر خیلی سر زبون ها بوده و چون برای تیم تلگرام و تون هست اعتبار زیادی داره و این ولت دومین ولت پر طرفدار دنیای کریپتو هست ، کارایی های زیادی هم داره مثل چنج کردن ایردراپ ها❤️
توی ویدیو اول تراست ولت رو آموزشش یاد دادیم و توی این ویدیو تون کیپر رو نحوه ساخت و انتقال و دریافت و ارز ها رو توضیح دادیم بهتون 🔥⚡️
با آموزش های روان و ساده ما سر زبون باش 😎🤝
منتظر آموزش های بعدی باش که نحوه خرید ا…
سلامی دوباره❤️
🤝یه تریدر موفق و پیروز باید پولاشو توی یک گاوصندوق خیلی امن نگهداری و ذخیره کنه.
📝حالا این گاوصندوق دیجیتالی چی هست؟ کیف پول تراست ولت و تون کیپر ، توی این ویدیو صفر تا صد استفاده از امن ترین ولت کریپتو رو آموزش میدم که تراست ولته.👛🛡
مراحل دقیق که گفته شده مثل نصب ، دریافت و انتقال ارز و....🔥
@shakh
تموم نشده ، ادامه داره⚡️
تو قسمت های قبلی یه سری اطلاعات و اصطلاحات رو بهت آموزش دادم.
امروز هم دوباره همین کار رو میکنیم ، اما با تعداد بیشتر و سطح بالاتر.
یاد گرفتن این اصطلاحات تورو میدونه از آماتور بودن خارج کنه.
پس دفتر و خودکار رو بردار
و ذهنتو باز کن و یاد بگیر 🔥
@shakh
این سری دیگه وقتشه محکم شروع کنیم.
بهت گفته بودم یه اسنایپر نیاز به ابزار داره ، حالا قول خودمو عملی کردم و امروز این اصطلاحات رو بهت توضیح دادم.
اصطلاحاتی مثل پامپ و دامپ و بلاکچین و....
سریع نوت برداری که تا اینا ملکهی ذهنت بشه ، چون قراره با این کلمات پول پارو کنیم 🔥
برای توضیحات بیشتر عضو کانال زیر باش ❤️
@Shakh
یه ماهیگیر به قلاب و طعمه نیاز داره ، یه خلبان نیاز به دانش و ابزار داره یه اسنایپری مثل من و توام نیاز به ابزار هایی داره که توی بازار نقطه زنی کنه و کارشو شروع کنه.🤓🤝
حالا توی این ویدیو یه سری نکات کلی میگم ، بعدش همرو دقیق برات توضیح میدم❤️
خب ، شروعش اینجاست 😎
پاتو از منطقه امن خودت بزار بیرون!
فقط کافیه استارت کار رو بزنی
وقتی میخوای از کسی آموزش ببینی باید بدونی و مشرف باشی که چی داره ؟ دستاوردهای اون فرد چیه ؟
علاوه بر اینکه شما همشون رو توی کانال دیدید ، توی ویدیو امروز هم یه نکات ریزی هم اعلام میکنم 🔥
دوره هانتر وال نتیجه چندین سال لیکویید شدن منه،الان دارم بهت آموزش میدم که تو لیکویید نشی رفیق ❤️
من اینجام که باهم بریم جلو ، نترس کنارتم 💵
وال هانتر آموزشی مختصر و دقیق و بدور از تئوریهای غیرکاربردی هستش و به زبانی ساده و راحت شما رو با فضای بازار ارزهای دیجیتال آشنا خواهد کرد 💡
با نت برداری و مشاهده دقیق دوره هانتروال
به چه دستاوردهایی خواهید رسید؟
-آشنایی با فضای ارزهای دیجیتال 💵
-معامله و ترید 🕯
-مدیریت سرمایه 📊
-مدیریت ریسک عالی ☄️
-تسلط به استراتژی هانتروال(استراتژی اختصاصی خودم) 🏆
-شانس بردن 3 هزار دلار برای یک نفر 2 هزار دلار برای 20 نفر و 200 ه…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @whale_hanter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 872,200 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دوره وال هانتر” (@whale_hanter), 36,761 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whale_hanter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
