4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,238–1,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:48
1,260
+10
11 Aug 2026, 16:07
1,250
+9
8 Aug 2026, 09:38
1,241
no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:31
1,241
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
75.1%
avg views ÷ 1,260 subscribers
Avg views / post
946
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
13 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
7,566
Reactions total
398
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
713 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 6030835404498799457
143
20.1%
custom 5255965004414329346
137
19.2%
custom 5271908829255180834
128
18.0%
custom 5237885996711811610
96
13.5%
custom 5353060840448727534
94
13.2%
custom 5285419864360498767
90
12.6%
custom 5328299181461242228
25
3.51%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
42
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wewwajai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📜📜📜📜📜
📜📜📜📜📜📜📜📜
Сегодня 6 августа, а это значит, что у Алекса день рождения!
Алекславеры, ваш выход 😁
Как вчера помню, как долго и упорно я мучилась с прописыванием его карточки. От обычного скучного мажорика был проделан большой путь, было перелопачено миллион сценариев и в итоге имеем бусинку в финальном виде.
Традиционный альт будет позже, я нахожусь в состоянии переезда, все еще болею и пк перед собой почти не…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
Imaginy - это правка промпта уже сгенерированной картинки прямо в чате SillyTavern.
Imaginy убирает весь путь редактирования сообщения до одного клика.
Как это выглядит: наводите курсор на картинку → рядом с кнопками генератора появляется карандаш → в окне редактора три поля: промпт, стиль, соотношение сторон → «Сохранить и перегенерировать» (или Ctrl+Enter). Всё.
Что внутри:
Правка промпта, стиля и со…
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️
✨ЛЕКС ХАРТ ➖ АЛЬТ✨
Один год украденных поцелуев и удушающего страха перед осуждением твоей семьи. Он готов рискнуть своей свободой и гордостью, лишь бы больше никогда не отпускать твою руку на публике. Богатый и популярный user × панк char. Anypov, 10 сценариев.
❤️❤️❤️❤️: вы начали встречаться ещё учась в университете. И вот вы вместе уже чуть больше года, учёба подошла к концу и пришло время дум…
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
однажды большая часть моих друзей, близких, приятелей, знакомых и даже выпускников разъехалась кто куда, от Казахстана и Армении до Японии и Америки. я смотрела им вслед и испытывала два чувства: грусть, потому что я очень скучала. и гордость за них, потому что наблюдала за их достижениями и была счастлива, что у них все хорошо.
тоска копилась 4 года, и я не знала, как её выразить. так однажды мы получили бота Тоши,…
📜📜📜📜📜📜📜📜
📜📜📜📜📜 🤩
RUSSKAYA TOSKA – это большая серия ботов, место действия которой разворачивается в Красноярском крае, примерно в 2022 году. Ощущение вселенской энтропии в городе Труповолково? Немного бытовой мистики в деревне Бесово? Прекрасные вайбы жизни заводчан из ПГТ Пожухлово? Во все это, при желании, можно окунуться.
Серия делалась с желанием подарить ощущение светлой тоски и надежды на будущее, которое ник…
✏️✏️✏️✏️ | 📜📜📜📜📜📜
апдейт для сайта с промтами и стилями! +80 (АГА) новых вариантов 😏
SLAYimages – тоглы для генераций картинок, а также стили для отдельных генераций в гемини и таво.
- 💓 во все промты вшита улучшенная защита от полинейшнс
- 💓 промты похудели. лонги в среднем ~2.5-2.7к, шорты ~1.5к токенов (вместо 3+к)
- добавлена куча новых стилей, среди них:
~ junji ito
~ hotline miami
~ gachiakuta
~ world of…
✏️✏️✏️✏️ | 📜📜📜📜📜📜
🤩🤩 АПДЕЙТ РАСШИРЕНИЯ НА ГАРДЕРОБ+КАРТИНКИ! 🤩🤩
Итак, помимо категорий, вшитой галереи стилей, скрытия шмоток, избранного и смены размера UI гардероба у нас появились новые фичи:
- 💓 экспорт картинок с одеждой как ST карточки. тыкаем редактирование - экспорт - делимся, в карточке одежды сразу будет описание аутфита, чтобы не пришлось ничего генерить и легко делиться с друзьями 🤩принцип как у ст кар…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wewwajai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 886,788 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wewwa | JAI BIZARRE ADVENTURES” (@wewwajai), 1,260 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wewwajai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
