Channel
@west_flora_msc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
534subscribers
+119 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002439599550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @west_flora_msc |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/west_flora_msc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 534 | +17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 517 | +21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 496 | +29 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 467 | +52 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 415 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 415 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
57 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 45.6% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5361898062077777754 | 3 | 5.26% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.75% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда, чтобы увидеть целое, нужно рассмотреть каждую деталь 🌱 Смотрите, как рождается букет 💜 Гортензия, дельфиниум, антуриум, орхидея - четыре разных настроения, сложившиеся в одну гармоничную картину🪻
❤3
Собрали взгляды и комплименты всех прохожих 🌺 Если бы у этого букета был голос, чтобы он сказал прохожим ? 🤔
❤3
Корзинки, от которых сложно оторваться😍 Мы знаем как вы их любите и решили пополнить нашу коллекцию 🤗 Успейте заказать первыми💕
🔥3❤2🥰1
Работа ,сделанная с душой 🤍 Соберем для Вас букет любой сложности под ваш вкус 🌸 Для заказа пишите нам @West_flora 💌
❤6❤🔥2🕊2🔥1
От детали к шедевру 🧩🔥 Наш фаворит - завораживающая протея 🤍
❤4🔥2😍2
Не ждите особого момента , создайте его сами ✨ Цветы - лучший способ подарить ей улыбку ❤️🩹
❤4👍3🔥2😍2
Немного цветочного волшебства и эстетики ✨💕
❤4😍3custom 53618980620777777542💔1
В этой корзине четыре характера ⚡️: эквадорские розы с их статью, гвоздики с их уязвимостью, красные георгины с их мощью и маттиола с её шлейфом 🌊 Хотите собрать свою корзину с историей? Приходите в @west_flora_msc - мы поможем вам сказать самое главное без лишних слов ❤️🩹
😍3🍓1custom 53618980620777777541
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @west_flora_msc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WEST FLORA | Цветы | Москва” (@west_flora_msc), 534 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/west_flora_msc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.