Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Верфь Инсайдер

@werfstore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

35,775subscribers

+502 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001588010867
TypeChannel
Username@werfstore
DescriptionЖизнь бренда «Верфь» глазами основателя: новости, предстоящие новинки, а также живая атмосфера офиса и производства. Связь - @Werf_Store_bot Сайт - https://clck.ru/3NNZNk Пожизненная гарантия - https://clck.ru/3NNZQG Чат - https://t.me/+qJ-EidFZ8oZhYTJi
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/werfstore

Growth

35,27335,77535,5246 August 2026 — 35,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,288 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,289 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,317 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,313 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,694 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,775 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +502. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,198–35,850 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:3635,775+81
12 Aug 2026, 09:3235,694+381
11 Aug 2026, 06:0135,313-4
9 Aug 2026, 05:5135,317+28
8 Aug 2026, 08:5235,289+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:1735,288+15
6 Aug 2026, 23:4735,273first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 35,775 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total89,720
Reactions total4,193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,740
Videos
427
Links
1,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,193 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,69040.3%
🔥1,66539.7%
😁3388.06%
👍1914.56%
🐳852.03%
👏721.72%
💯661.57%
🥰571.36%
🤔170.405%
🤝50.119%
🤯40.095%
😡30.072%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,290 views32 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Читали ли вы свою натальную карту?

  1. Да24%
  2. Нет, но хочу21%
  3. Нет, не хочу55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15😁14🥰2😡1

14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,270 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Я и астрология:

  1. Смотрю, читаю, разбираю8%
  2. Специально нет, но одним глазком26%
  3. Нет, но дичью не считаю15%
  4. нет, но по приколу смотрю и в Верфи куплю козу в 2027 :)23%
  5. полная ненаучная дичь33%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20😁7🤯1😡1

14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,240 views86 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Привет, друзья! Маша тут прикольный нам контент предложила и сделала) Все части публиковать не буду, «повезло» только Львам, Близнецам и Козерогам😂 Сумки хоть и женские, но мне как Льву Ракушка нравится, надо с гордостью и определенной степенью независимости и наплевательским отношением к чужому мнению носить эту сумку... Типа: - Сумка какая-то инфантильная? - Пффф... Я — Лев, и красиво только то, что я считаю кра

50😁24🔥12

13 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈3,940 views292 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Ева тут фото прислала прикольные с нашего магазина в Авиапарке) Надо будет про него как-то написать) А я встречался на прошлой неделе в Москве с людьми из индустрии, и все говорят, что трафик в ТЦ очень сильно падает, многие сейчас активно думают или уже сокращают розничную сеть. Смешной диалог был: один человек сказал, что ChatGPT рекомендует закрывать магазины и развивать онлайн. И тут даже не зн

185💯62😁17🔥15👍8🥰5

12 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈4,770 views175 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Много про Нью Бамбэг спрашивали :) И мы тут подумали рокировочку сделать: на время Бамбэг Макси убрать, Нью вернуть... Тут у нас красную наппу к красному сафьяну подвезли (причём сафьян пока только образцы, так как отрабатывают артикул, а наппа уже партия есть), и мы подумали, можно как раз такой самый-самый чистый красный цвет затестировать и в сумках. А то у нас то поинсианна, то маджента... Заво

108🔥52👏13👍2

11 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈5,600 views40 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Я…

  1. покупал(-а) с рук больше 7 раз5%
  2. покупал(-а) с рук больше 3 раз14%
  3. покупал(-а) с рук один раз36%
  4. не покупал(-а) с рук, но продавал(-а) больше 7 раз3%
  5. не покупал(-а) с рук, но продавал(-а) больше 3 раз11%
  6. не покупал(-а) с рук, но продавал(-а) один раз35%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

40

11 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈5,300 views164 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Привет, друзья! Тут и в максе, и в телеге вы активно сумками Верфи торгуете, я уж про Авито не говорю:) Это, конечно, приятно очень, наверное, но давайте поймем объем этого черного рынка 😂 Опрос проведем: интересно узнать, продавали ли вы или покупали когда-нибудь сумки Верфи с рук? П.С. Вчера в платках столько поучаствовало людей, сколько ни в одном опросе не участвовало! Вот это нормальная вовлеченность) Уже вы

93🔥37👍33😡1

10 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈5,820 views305 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Ну что, вопрос: мы тут, возможно, если вы читаете наши чаты, видели, что у нас есть в планах сделать платки... Точнее, не так: у нас не то что в планах есть, а мы их сделаем😂 потому что рисунки готовы и были получены образцы, как раз в среду посреди собрания по маркетингу. Оно было активным, но я не сдержался и стал открывать, и всё собрание как в тумане, там просто чума🔥 Но вопрос: дизайна два, ра

🔥20077😁27🐳1

9 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈5,160 views274 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Привет, друзья! Воскресный пост = истории пост! Вы, может, уже устали, но ничего не могу с собой поделать🙈 Надо же нам закончить наш рассказ о месте, где находится производство Верфи, а оно легендарно (место). Тем более о нем существует мегаинтересная книга и воспоминания❤️‍🔥 Итак, осень 1847 года. Выборгская набережная выглядит не как столица империи, а как северная деревня — рыбацкие сети, коряги, баржи с дровам

150🔥85👍32🥰6🐳1

9 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈4,430 views93 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥67👍146🥰4🐳2

8 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈5,300 views446 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Субботний пост = какой-то детский пост🙈 Не мог пройти мимо этого) Эту неделю ребенок мой провел много времени у меня на работе, вчера так вообще целый день😊 Уже изнемогая от безделья, она подходит ко мне в середине дня и говорит: «Папа, давай я хоть сумку вам сделаю, что ли». Это было смешно, но я серьезно говорю: «Конечно, доча, давай». Приносит она мне сие творение через какое-то время со слов

😁201146🔥68🥰18👏5🐳4👍4

7 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈6,250 views264 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Привет, друзья! Сегодня должен был быть классный пост-опрос, очень важный, но Наташа уехала в деревню) А она нам нужна для него, поэтому он будет в понедельник🙈 Сегодня просто напомню вам, как выглядит Валония. Вы, уверен, забыли😉 И о том, что у нас она вышла в монохроме) Ну и в целом обзорчик прикольный❤️ Еще вопрос: выпускать ли нам бордовую Шелл и Дельфин в монохроме сейчас? Он у нас в сторис. P.S. И посмотри

134🔥106👍12🥰12

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @werfstore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTCAnonymous Poll859 voters

Читали ли вы свою натальную карту?

  1. Да24%
  2. Нет, но хочу21%
  3. Нет, не хочу55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTCAnonymous Poll784 voters

Я и астрология:

  1. Смотрю, читаю, разбираю8%
  2. Специально нет, но одним глазком26%
  3. Нет, но дичью не считаю15%
  4. нет, но по приколу смотрю и в Верфи куплю козу в 2027 :)23%
  5. полная ненаучная дичь33%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTCAnonymous Poll410 voters

Я…

  1. покупал(-а) с рук больше 7 раз5%
  2. покупал(-а) с рук больше 3 раз14%
  3. покупал(-а) с рук один раз36%
  4. не покупал(-а) с рук, но продавал(-а) больше 7 раз3%
  5. не покупал(-а) с рук, но продавал(-а) больше 3 раз11%
  6. не покупал(-а) с рук, но продавал(-а) один раз35%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 49,930 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Верфь Инсайдер” (@werfstore), 35,775 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/werfstore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.