если что я теперь обитаю там
Signed вета

Channel
@wenttoheaven
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001604669779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wenttoheaven |
| Description | вета элисбш чудит @elisbshh яяя |
| Created | 6 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wenttoheaven |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 10 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
180 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 52 | 28.9% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 26.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 25.6% | |
| ⚡ | 26 | 14.4% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 3.33% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2023 to 25 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
если что я теперь обитаю там
Signed вета
а чего вас тут столько осталось…
Signed вета
я отпишусь от всех поэтому если хотите остаться мью то пишите под анкетой тут @wistsun
💋6
Signed вета
што я могу сказать я подумала и решила что переделывать этот канал в эстет нет смысла поэтому я)) переезжаю)) канальчик оставлю скорее всего буду проводить здесь игры или что-то такое
💋6
Signed вета
#edit #gidle seo soojin>>
⚡8❤8❤🔥8💋1
Signed вета
#edit #stray kids call me rover
💋13❤8❤🔥4⚡1🔥1
Signed вета
половина фанфиков по банхо называются драйв это база
❤🔥5⚡2❤2
Signed вета
q: Плиз топ 3 кринжовых и топ 3 лучших фф которые ты читала лол я столько кринжовых фанфиков читала из не пересчитать но если по скизам то 3. любой фанфик по учанам 2. porn star dancing 1. stress management лучшие это 3. drive 2. 2000 кассет 1. drrrive (это уже другой….) БОЖЕ КАК ЖЕ Я ЛЮБЛЮ ДРРРАЙВ всем оч сильно советую 🙏🏻🙏🏻
💋6⚡2
Signed вета
q: можно кита в реакциях пожалуйста, если не сложно((( a: он не вписывается в цветовую композицию 💔💔
❤🔥5💋2⚡1
Signed вета
в цирке заманчиво пахнет сладким карамельным попкорном, слышится хохот детей, окруживших забавного клоуна, где-то вдалеке раздаётся рычание тигров. старый фокусник из-за потёртой ткани кулис наблюдает за несколькими молодыми людьми; странствующая труппа готовится к последнему выступлению в этом городе. чан ведёт друзей к их местам, разводит руками, широко улыбаясь и произносит: — та-дам, welcome to circus если бы о…
❤🔥8💋8💔4⚡1❤1💊1
Signed вета
казалось бы, для того, чтобы помирить двух рассорившихся друзей, можно всей компанией сходить куда-нибудь развлечься. вы правы, прекрасная идея! а где же ещё будет веселее, чем в цирке? тем более, таком необычном..
❤7❤🔥4⚡3💋2
Signed вета
q: выебнись как то люто прям сейчас ко мне скоро придут два альбома скизов достаточно??
❤🔥1
Signed вета
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wenttoheaven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wenttoheaven named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“!переезд | to heaven and back” (@wenttoheaven), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wenttoheaven.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.