Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
⌗ℛ𝘪𝘹𝘪𝘴⸝⸝.ᐟ⋆
@welliinxaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002632176533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @welliinxaa |
| Description | https://t.me/boost/welliinxaa вдруг кто захочет, хз |
| Created | 15 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/welliinxaa |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 12 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 15 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 370.8%
- avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 44.5
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 31.6%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (15 April 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 178 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
71 reactions across 4 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5195384920201010424 | 11 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5195353670018947418 | 8 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5190430812864019079 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5195235227705827285 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5204053598723400624 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5231333985447073655 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5301110204526523193 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5451826735861488832 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5307783857855033888 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| custom 5188464924728260586 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| custom 5195352523262678602 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5231279057110325686 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5231401996254216789 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5368456279570280837 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5368681554899924837 | 1 | 1.41% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐⭐ — my most ⭐⭐ favorite kents
custom 51904308128640190794custom 51953536700189474183custom 51953849202010104243custom 51884649247282605861custom 51952352277058272851custom 52040535987234006241custom 54518267358614888321
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩 life is so uncertain 🤩🤩🤩 that we ought to 🤩🤩🤩 secure happiness while it is within 🏝 🤩 our reach. 🤩🤩 🧡Alexandre Dumas «The Count of Monte Cristo»
custom 52040535987234006245custom 51953536700189474184custom 51953849202010104244custom 51884649247282605861custom 51904308128640190791custom 51952352277058272851custom 54518267358614888321
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
custom 51952352277058272854custom 51953849202010104244custom 54518267358614888324custom 51884649247282605861custom 51904308128640190791custom 51953536700189474181
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝐖𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐔𝐏 𝐁𝐑𝐎!¡ ❤️` mini info — 🔤аты - yep ⭐️⭐️ — 🔤к - nope ⭐️⭐️ — 🔤з — газ — 🔤ник ничего не ставлю 🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🥚` characters — 🔤nna #️⃣(100%) #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣🔤oife 🔤olloy — #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣(100%) — 🔤nnika 🔤olkov #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣(90%) #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣🔤ane 🔤mith — #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣(15%) — 🔤laire 🔤iggs #️⃣#️⃣(60%) #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣🔤ae4ka — #️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️⃣#️…
custom 52313339854470736556custom 53011102045265231936custom 53077838578550338884custom 51953525232626786022custom 52312790571103256862custom 52314019962542167892custom 53684562795702808372custom 53686815548999248371
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @welliinxaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 970,600 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⌗ℛ𝘪𝘹𝘪𝘴⸝⸝.ᐟ⋆” (@welliinxaa), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/welliinxaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.