Channel
@weixinh88l
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,414subscribers
+319 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003928661510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weixinh88l |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 2 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weixinh88l |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:23 | 3,414 | +441 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 2,973 | -113 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 3,086 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 3,090 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 3,092 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 3,094 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 3,095 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 3,095 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (2 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
【珍妮工作室】😵💫😂😵💫😂 主营：📱微信 📱抖音 📱QQ 📱飞机号 📱微博 📱小红书 红书 📱FB 📱 领英 📱IG 📱推特 📱LINE账号 📱全球WS账号 等各种账号。 🤫海外号商📱一手粉商📱WS群发📱看图王📱 🤫所有商品请先少量购买进行测试，可以使用再批量购买，避免造成不必要的争执。谢谢 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ ⚠️平台声明: 拿货的代理同行，严禁欺诈行为，一经发现，永久终止合作。😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✅业务客服： @weixinwe ✅双向联系： @weixinweubot
珍妮在售的各种业务导航 点这里 单笔消费满100u的老板送一个号永久免费 不需要任何费用（只能电脑使用）另外不想消费满100u的也可以零售 微信号业务😀 QQ号业务😀 抖音号业务😀 快手号业务😀 小红书业务🌟 代解封业务😍 飞机号业务😂 飞机会员业务😂 群发器业务😂 支付宝业务😀 群发价格表😂 代实名业务😂 僵尸粉业务🤣 手机卡流量卡业务😂 色粉账号业务🤣 ------------------------------------- 海外社交软件 LINE🌟 TIKTOK🌟 WhatsAPP🌟 facebook🌟 kakao🌟 twitter🌟 tinder🌟 Inst…
国内带设备微信系列 苹果6S/ 苹果6SP+国内实名 苹果6sp+实名一年170U 苹果7/ 苹果7p + 国内实名 苹果7p+实名一年180U 苹果8/ 苹果8p + 国内实名 苹果7p+实名一年185U 苹果X +一年国内sm200U 苹果11+一年国内sm220U 苹果12+一年国内sm250U 私人带设备安卓+ 国内实名 年200U 企业微信绿+设备+实名微信 320U 已过国家安全包到手能加人 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻@weixinwe 👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻双向联系 @weixinweubot
年以上红标企业 美国满年实名己绑定微信 红标直登 (无视网络) 加人接粉 有客服功能 功能齐全 🥺😚😗😉😭😢😔😥🧐😂 🥳🤪欢迎咨询 客服： 🚩官方客服：weixinwe 双向客服： weixinweubot
👻🎈👻😇🥰😭😜💋😌✍🍡🎈👻🎈 ✈️请点击下面的蓝色字体直击导航✈️ 😦😦😦😦😦😦😦😦😦😦😦😦 😍海外APP账号导航区😍 😀Line账号 😀tandem账户 ================================== 📱 苹果ID账户 😀 Google邮箱 ================================== 😢亚马逊账号 😀 Discord账号 ================================== 😀LinkedIn账号 😀 TikTok账户 …
🐉😀😀🐉🐉🇷🇸🇷🇸😀🐉😃 ♾ ♾国内阅读微信大量到货 🥰满月 有货 🥰二月 有货 🥰三月 有货 🥰四月 有货 🥰半年 有货 🥰一年 有货 🥰两年 有货 😀飞机客服：@weixinwe
加人被加主加都不需要验证 嘎嘎牛逼 有需要的盘口量大可以来谈 质量嘎嘎稳定 好货不等人 一个也是批发价，价格优惠便宜年号 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 💵💶🪙💷💴🪙🪙 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻@weixinwe
Photo, posted without a caption
😄微信私人号‼️满年‼️带好友解封‼️带支付密码‼️价格小贵📱 接粉首选💋嘎嘎硬💋 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 🥺😚😗😉😭😢😔😥🧐😂 🥳🤪欢迎咨询 客服：@zhenni138
😄微信私人号‼️满年‼️带好友解封‼️带支付密码‼️价格小贵📱 接粉首选💋嘎嘎硬💋 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 🥺😚😗😉😭😢😔😥🧐😂 🥳🤪欢迎咨询 客服：@weixinwe
年以上红标企业 美国满年实名己绑定微信 红标直登 (无视网络) 加人接粉 有客服功能 功能齐全 🥺😚😗😉😭😢😔😥🧐😂 🥳🤪欢迎咨询 客服：@weixinwe
📱📱📱📱📱 月卡月亮 有货 月卡单太 有货 月卡双太 有货 月卡三太 有货 只要不是永久封 基本能解 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 购买联系💁♀️：官方客服： @weixinwe
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @weixinh88l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,215,883 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@weixinh88l named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“出售微信号🏆购买微信号🏆微信号出售🏆微信号购买” (@weixinh88l), 3,414 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weixinh88l.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.