Channel
@weixian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,547subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001153118460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weixian |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weixian |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 1,547 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 1,554 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 1,554 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
iOS 27上线全新反诈功能，可识别用户是否正被骗子“远程指导”转账 苹果将在 iOS 27 中推出全新的“信任洞察（Trust Insights）”反诈框架，旨在帮助银行、支付平台及其他应用识别用户是否正遭遇“社会工程诈骗”，并在关键操作前及时发出风险提醒，降低被骗概率。 该功能主要针对近年来高发的“远程指导式诈骗”。骗子通常冒充银行工作人员、警方、政府部门或亲友，通过电话、短信或聊天软件一步步诱导受害者自行完成转账、修改账户信息、授权登录等操作。由于这些操作均由用户本人输入密码或使用人脸、指纹验证完成，传统安全验证机制往往难以及时识别。 “信任洞察”不会读取用户的短信、邮件、照片等隐私内容，而是依靠设备端机器学习，分析用户的操作节奏、交互行为、当前使用情境以及有限的设备传感器信息，对风险进行评估。系统会给出“未知风险”“中等风险”或“高风险”三种判断结果。 接入该框架的银行、支付及其他应用，可根据风险等级采取相应措施，…
❤1
万象警方突袭赌场、电诈窝点，28名中国籍嫌疑人落网，另有10人在逃 7月2日，老挝万象市警方接获群众举报，称位于赛塔尼区Xăng Chiêng市场一酒店内，疑似存在网络赌博及电信诈骗（Call Center）犯罪窝点。经调查核实后，警方于7月3日晚组织统一收网，对多个涉案地点展开突击行动。 行动中，警方共抓获28名中国籍嫌疑人，其中女性9人。经初步核查，仅1人持有本人护照，其余27人均未持有护照。现场查获手机75部、电脑48台（含台式及笔记本）、赌博桌3张、赌博筹码、大量网络设备及2本护照等涉案物品。 据了解，警方共检查了三个涉案房间： C8502房间：现场正在进行网络赌博活动，嫌疑人通过直播方式组织线上百家乐等赌博项目，28名中国籍嫌疑人全部在此落网。 E8506房间：警方确认该房间为中国籍电信诈骗团伙窝点，但执法人员抵达时，涉案人员已全部逃离，现场查获大量电脑、手机及网络设备。 B233房间：调查显示，该处为越南籍诈骗团伙窝…
#网友投稿：缅甸老街曾经多辉煌啊，车水马龙，人声鼎沸，到处都是机会，那时的大佬出门都是AK配皮卡，现在都已成为历史了。 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🆕感谢您关注 @WeiXian （危险）海外黑料曝光频道 如需投稿爆料 请联系 ： @LiEEE
日媒：胡石在日本落网，警方深挖公司经营及签证问题 据日本共同社7月2日报道，44岁的塞浦路斯籍男子胡石（常用名胡小伟）被日本警视厅逮捕后，调查已从涉嫌虚假住址登记，扩大至其公司经营情况及签证取得过程。 报道称，胡石于2025年10月入境日本，长期入住大阪多家高档酒店，警方通过酒店监控锁定其行踪并实施抓捕。 警方表示，胡石涉嫌于2026年4月向东京都中央区提交虚假住址登记，目前正调查其名下公司是否实际经营，以及“高度专业职1号”签证是否存在违规取得或滥用情况。 与胡石一同被捕的31岁中国籍男子李垠宏，同样持有高度专业人才签证。警方认为，两人的在留资格是否被违规利用，也是案件调查重点之一。 目前，案件仍在进一步侦办中。 #日本新闻 #胡石 #日本警方 #签证 #高度专业人才签证 #胡小伟 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🆕感谢您关注 @WeiXian （危险）海外黑料曝光频道 如需投稿爆料 请联系 ： @LiEEE
#网友爆料：小勐拉开始扫荡，天宫一号抓捕狗推。 拍照的这兄弟手抠了不该抠的 都发黑了 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🆕感谢您关注 @WeiXian （危险）海外黑料曝光频道 如需投稿爆料 请联系 ： @LiEEE
金边水净华区水域连现两具男性浮尸 相距仅约100米 7月3日上午，金边市水净华区（Chroy Changvar District）水域发现一具男性浮尸。 随后，当天上午，又在距离第一具遗体约100米处发现第二具男性浮尸。两具遗体均为男性，发现地点相距仅约100米，引发周边民众关注。 目前，两名死者身份及死亡原因尚不清楚，相关情况仍有待进一步确认。 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🆕感谢您关注 @WeiXian （危险）海外黑料曝光频道 如需投稿爆料 请联系 ： @LiEEE
#网友投稿：茶胶省中国人和柬埔寨人发生冲突，集体殴打中国包工头。 PS 估计是把柬埔寨人当中国人整了 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🆕感谢您关注 @WeiXian （危险）海外黑料曝光频道 如需投稿爆料 请联系 ： @LiEEE
西港侦破弃置AK-47步枪案！5人被捕，涉3名中国男子、2名柬埔寨女子 柬埔寨西哈努克省警方近日成功侦破一起非法持有枪支案件，在调查过程中共抓获5名涉案人员，包括3名中国籍男子和2名柬埔寨籍女子，并缴获多支枪械、弹药及其他涉案物品。 据了解，6月29日，西哈努克省警方接获民众举报，称西港第四分区一处空地发现一支疑似被人弃置的AK-47步枪。警方接报后立即赶赴现场勘查，当场查获一支AK-47步枪、一枚弹壳及7发子弹，并迅速成立专案组展开追查。 经过连续侦查，警方随后锁定并抓获5名嫌疑人，同时缴获一支SUR-M9步枪、一发子弹、疑似吸毒工具、一部手机、一辆摩托车及其他相关证物。 警方表示，经调查审讯确认，其中2名中国籍嫌疑人与非法持有枪支案件存在直接关联，其余3人经初步调查后确认与本案无直接关系。 目前，两名涉案中国籍嫌疑人已依法移送司法机关处理，案件仍在进一步侦办中，警方将继续追查相关线索，全面厘清案件情况。 #柬埔寨新闻 #西港…
#波贝再掀大清查！104名涉赌诈及涉黄外籍人员落网，多处窝点被查封 7月2日，柬埔寨卜迭棉芷省政府联合执法工作组在波贝市展开新一轮突击清查行动，对9处涉嫌违法犯罪的场所进行搜查，共查获104名外籍人员，并缴获一批涉案物品。 行动中，执法人员发现多名未持有效护照的泰国籍和印度尼西亚籍人员。在部分出租屋及一家名为“聚风港”的娱乐场所内，警方现场查获1支手枪、大量电脑、手机，以及百家乐等赌博设备。 经技术部门初步鉴定，上述场所涉嫌从事非法网络赌博、诈骗及涉黄性交易活动。被查获人员分别来自中国、泰国、印度尼西亚、印度、尼泊尔和缅甸等多个国家。 目前，多处涉案场所已被执法部门临时查封，所有涉案人员均已移交警方依法进一步调查和处理。 #柬埔寨新闻 #波贝 #涉黄 #外国人 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🆕感谢您关注 @WeiXian （危险）海外黑料曝光频道 如需投稿爆料 请联系 ： @LiEEE
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @weixian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 208,227 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@weixian named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“海外黑料曝光频道/缅北缅甸迪拜果敢柬埔寨泰国菲律宾灰产猪仔” (@weixian), 1,547 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weixian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.