Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wir in Ost-Afrika 🌴

Channel

Wir in Ost-Afrika 🌴

@wegnachuganda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

370subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318327318
TypeChannel
Username@wegnachuganda
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wegnachuganda

Growth

3708 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 370 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:00 — 370 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:019 Aug 2026, 06:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 369–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:00370no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:01370first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3371.7%
👍817.4%
🎉24.35%
🔥24.35%
🙏12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 17:25 UTC250 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

12.06.2026 Heute Morgen sind wir wohlbehalten im neuen Terminal 3 gelandet. Uns empfing ein so regnerischen und kaltes Frankfurt, dass die Jungs verwundert waren, dass wir gerade im Juni sind. 🌧 Der zweite Flug war leider durchwachsen, etwas im Essen an Bord haben wir nicht gut vertragen und die Nacht war durch die Reise kurz und unterbrochen. Deshalb haben wir den Tag bisher in einem warmen Wohnzimmer von Freunden

9👍8🎉2🔥2🙏1

11 Jun 2026, 09:25 UTC227 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

11.06.2026 Die letzte Nacht in Kenia haben wir im Gästehaus der deutschen Missionsorganisation Diguna (DIe GUte Nachricht für Afrika) verbracht. Ein wunderschönes Gelände, direkt am Nairobi National Park. Sie erzählten uns, dass manchmal sogar Giraffen zu sehen sind und es schon vorkam, dass ein Löwe auf dem Gelände war und einmal sogar ihren Hund gerissen hat. 😳 Wir hatten eine ruhige Nacht, kamen entspannt an den

14

10 Jun 2026, 20:47 UTC219 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

10.06.2026 Der Film "The Last Giraffe" war indirekt der Startpunkt des Giraffen-Centers in Nairobi. Das Regisseurs-Paar hatte mit einigen Tieren schon wegen der Dreharbeiten zusammen auf dem Gelände gelebt, als die Idee entstand, die Pflege- und Aufzuchtstation daraus entstehen zu lassen. Wir haben diesen besonderen Ort heute besucht und das Highlight war es, die Giraffen selbst zu füttern – was für schöne, intelli

10

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @wegnachuganda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,369,141 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wir in Ost-Afrika 🌴” (@wegnachuganda), 370 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wegnachuganda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.