Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Weekly Charts

@weekly_charts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,414subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001635903104
TypeChannel
Username@weekly_charts
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/weekly_charts

Growth

1,4131,4141,413.56 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,414 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,413–1,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:461,414+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:141,413no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:371,413first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5565.5%
🔥2732.1%
👍22.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC256 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @data_csvPhoto

Если вы спросите у ChatGPT, как быть с родственниками мужа, которые вмешиваются в ваш брак — он посоветует держать дистанцию и не пытаться их переубедить. Китайский товарищ DeepSeek предложил бы найти с ними компромисс. А французский Мистраль — вести дневник эмоций, чтобы выплеснуть свой гнев. Мы уже привыкли к тому, что модели часто «галлюцинируют» — с уверенностью выдают неправильные ответы за верные. Но что, если

🔥5👍2

21 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTC398 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @YaResearchesPhoto

🌞 Сегодня — летнее солнцестояние. Мы готовились к нему с подобающим языческим размахом: жгли костры электричество в офисе, погружались в ночное озеро базы данных и гадали на суженого над смыслом поисковых запросов. В результате выяснили, когда именно люди особенно активно интересуются солнцестояниями и равноденствиями, а также что хотят узнать об этих астрономических событиях. Ожидаемо, чаще всего спрашивают про зим

🔥43

29 May 2026, 16:54 UTC574 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Душевный и красивый датавиз в реальности на витрине Источник

10🔥4

18 May 2026, 09:44 UTC733 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📚 Графики по художественным произведениям Отличные визуализации к роману Ф.М. Достоевского "Бѣсы" от Полины. Использованы: R и пакеты {lubridate} для работы с датами, {rulexicon} для работы со словарем распределения эмоциональной тональности, {ggraph} + {igraph} для графов персонажей. Мне кажется, такие визуализации органично вписались бы в проект Живые страницы от Samsung, о котором писал ранее. #R #ggraph #литер

17🔥7

14 May 2026, 07:07 UTC581 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @naukaidannyePhoto

Atlas of Global Development 2026 Прекрасный пример сторителлинга! В проекте «Atlas of Global Development 2026» представлены интерактивные истории и визуализации данных о ключевых глобальных тенденциях, связанных с людьми, благосостоянием, нашей планетой, инфраструктурой и цифровой трансформацией в разрезе стран.

🔥32

28 Apr 2026, 12:55 UTC690 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📊 Курс «Визуализация данных и введение в BI инструменты» от Яндекс Практикума Пользуясь случаем и как один из авторов, хочу пригласить вас на наш курс «Визуализация данных и введение в BI инструменты» от Яндекс Практикума. 📅 Ближайшие старты — 30 апреля, 7 мая и 14 мая. Вы можете выбрать удобную дату при регистрации. Вводная часть курса доступна бесплатно! Курс подойдёт аналитикам, маркетологам, продактам, дизайне

5

27 Apr 2026, 17:49 UTC594 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

👀 Люди могут не говорить, но их поисковые запросы говорят за них Люди не всегда готовы отвечать честно на вопросы социологов. История запросов показывает не мнения, а реальные интересы, тревоги и намерения. Сет Стивенс-Давидовиц в книге Все лгут. Поисковики, Big Data и Интернет знают о вас всё (2018) пишет, что Google-запросы часто дают более честную картину, чем социология. Это следы реального поведения, а не декла

9🔥4

20 Apr 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔍 Сколько лет люди остаются на одной работе по разным профессиям? Интересная визуализация от Нейтана Яу на основе данных Current Population Survey (2018–2024) в США. Респондентов спрашивали: «Сколько лет вы работаете на текущей работе?». Самая высокая медианная продолжительность: у руководителей пожарных и полицейских подразделений. Самая низкая: у водителей такси и операторов транспортных средств. На первом график

4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @weekly_charts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 194,261 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Weekly Charts” (@weekly_charts), 1,414 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weekly_charts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.