$PANIC at $400k. Been in since 120k
Signed Weekend Bankers

Channel
@weekendfindstg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
56subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002132297228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weekendfindstg |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weekendfindstg |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 56 | -1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 57 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 58 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 60 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2024 to 12 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$PANIC at $400k. Been in since 120k
Signed Weekend Bankers
10m ✅
Signed Weekend Bankers
8m left almost 3x I brought more on the dip at 2.2m as well
Signed Weekend Bankers
$RELAX $2.9m 6LYqVzVfqpjVT2dEJqpJG7C4eBNoy3tTTk1u7a4Mpump
Signed Weekend Bankers
AukBmw5Ny5bwLESetTA86zmJN5taydTA1zAoebAMpump ౦‸౦ $32k 110 people on a twitter spaces talking about this
Signed Weekend Bankers
Bot found this yesterday. Annoyed I was sleeping but if you had it on it ran to 30k% lmao 🔗 Your Referral Link: https://t.me/JeetBotAI_BOT?start=x0jvszjn6z
Signed Weekend Bankers
All from today. I did no research the coins was auto sniped with the features on jeet bot that are preset. Just doing small amount to test currently but seems profitable. It’s in beta so you need an invite link mine gives you 10% off fees :) https://t.me/JeetBotAI_BOT?start=x0jvszjn6z GL all!
Signed Weekend Bankers
https://t.me/JeetBotAI_BOT?start=x0jvszjn6z Free invite code for jeet bot, it auto snipes tokens. Check my Twitter I’ve had 5 winners first day using it. You can set sell orders etc and it’s really quick give it a try
Signed Weekend Bankers
https://t.me/JeetBotAI_BOT?start=x0jvszjn6z
Signed Weekend Bankers
I missed it but it went 400m wtf lol
❤1
Signed Weekend Bankers
Try get in early to MR Punks project he’s laughing soon. Easily mooning
Signed Weekend Bankers
Anyone still active? I’m back 👀
❤4
Signed Weekend Bankers
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @weekendfindstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Weekend Calls” (@weekendfindstg), 56 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weekendfindstg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.