Ну что, соскучились? Мы тоже! Прошлый год стал для нас особенным. Мы впервые запустили новый формат — стратегическую сессию для ивент-специалистов ADD W. Это был день, когда можно было выбрать профильное направление, перенять опыт у мощнейших спикеров и лидеров рынка, а потом отдохнуть, завершив рабочий сезон и перейдя к подготовке к премиям. Что именно мы делали? Определяли, что БУДЕТ актуально в следующем году, ч…

Channel
Wedding Awards Северо-Запад
@wedding_awards_nw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,064subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001950269862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wedding_awards_nw |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wedding_awards_nw |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 1,064 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 1,065 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 1,066 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 1,067 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 1,067 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.3%
- avg views ÷ 1,064 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 216
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (21 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 216 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 18s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Встречаем новый летний номер Wedding июнь-август’26 💛 В нем вы найдете: – 15 главных трендов Barcelona Bridal Fashion Week – лучшие направления для свадьбы и свадебного путешествия – номинантов и победителей ежегодной Wedding Awards – съемку-прогулку по цветущему Царицино – обзор украшений для невест, которые любят погорячее – гид по косметичке для пляжного отдыха – и самое летнее настроение. Для @wedding_magazine_…
Встречаем новый летний номер Wedding июнь-август’26 💛 В нем вы найдете: – 15 главных трендов Barcelona Bridal Fashion Week – лучшие направления для свадьбы и свадебного путешествия – номинантов и победителей ежегодной Wedding Awards – съемку-прогулку по цветущему Царицино – обзор украшений для невест, которые любят погорячее – гид по косметичке для пляжного отдыха – и самое летнее настроение. Для @wedding_magazine_…
⚡️Поздравляем победителей Wedding Awards’26⚡️ Часть 1 Номинация «ЛУЧШЕЕ СВАДЕБНОЕ АГЕНТСТВО» ▪️Feerique Event (Феерик Ивент), Москва Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ РОССИЙСКИЙ СВАДЕБНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ» ▪️Wedesthetique (Ведестетик) – проект «Усадьба Тихоненко», Красноярск Специальная номинации «ЛУЧШАЯ ЗВЕЗДНАЯ СВАДЬБА» ▪️Markevich Wedding (Маркевич Веддинг) – Свадьба Ксении Бородиной и Николая Сердюкова Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ ЗАРУБЕЖНЫЙ СВА…
⚡️Поздравляем победителей Wedding Awards’26⚡️ Часть 2 Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ СВАДЕБНЫЙ ВЕДУЩИЙ» ▪️Антон Зайцев, Москва Номинация «ЛУЧШАЯ СВАДЕБНАЯ ВЕДУЩАЯ» ▪️Катя Водопьянова, Санкт-Петербург Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ ДУЭТ ВЕДУЩИХ» ▪️Дуэт «Стас Зубков и Митя Горький», Москва Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ ЦЕРЕМОНИЙМЕЙСТЕР» ▪️Владислав Сапунов, Москва Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ СВАДЕБНЫЙ ФОТОГРАФ» ▪️Даниил Никулин, Москва Номинация «ЛУЧШАЯ ДОКУМ…
Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ КОРПОРАТИВНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ» В алфавитном порядке ↓ Финалисты: ▪️Агентство ESTHETIQUE EVENTS (ЭСТЕТИК ИВЕНТС) – проект «Кофемания. Все звёзды», Москва @esthetique.events ▪️Fortera (Фортера) – проект «Another Reality (Эназер Реалити)», Ульяновская область @fortera.ru ▪️M2 EVENTS AGENCY (М2 ИВЕНТС ЭЖЕНСИ) – проект «Путь мастера. От импровизации к вдохновению», Москва @m2_event_agency ▪️MARIYA MANN EVENT ST…
Номинация «ЛУЧШАЯ СВАДЕБНАЯ ВЕДУЩАЯ» В алфавитном порядке ↓ Финалисты: ▪️Виктория Шевченко, Ессентуки @vika_shev_ ▪️Катя Водопьянова, Санкт-Петербург @katya_vodopyanova ▪️Ника Саттарова, Москва @nikushadzha ▪️Татьяна Першина, Москва @pershinatany Шорт-лист: •Анастасия Раззарёнова, Санкт-Петербург @razzarenova •Анна Шамбадал, Челябинск @shambadal •Елена Пиканова, Ульяновск @elena_pikantnaya •Карина Васильева, Москв…
Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ КАВЕР-ПРОЕКТ» В алфавитном порядке ↓ Финалисты: ▪️БОМБЕЙ, Краснодарский край @bombay_cover ▪️Дунаевский Orchestra (Оркестра), Санкт-Петербург @dunaevskiycover ▪️Министерство Культуры, Москва @mincult.show ▪️JD BAND (ДЖЕЙ ДИ БЭНД), Москва @jdband_spb Шорт-лист: •КАВЕР-ГРУППА «НА СТИЛЕ», Москва @nastile_cover •ЛИСЫ, Черноземье @lisy.band •НЕСТРОЙНЫЕ, Москва @nestroynie •Саботаже, Москва @the.sabota…
Номинация «ЛУЧШЕЕ РЕШЕНИЕ ДЛЯ СВАДЬБЫ С БЮДЖЕТОМ ДО 3-Х МЛН» Данная номинация – одна из самых многочисленных среди остальных агентских номинаций, а также одна из самых интересных. Поэтому в этом году мы расширили список финалистов, чтобы услышать большее количество участников на защите проектов. Финалисты: ▪️ТРЕПЕТНО, Северо-Запад, Череповец @trepetno_wedding ▪️Drugoe Events (Другое Ивентс), Черноземье, Воронеж @dr…
Номинация «ЛУЧШИЙ РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫЙ СВАДЕБНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ (СВАДЬБА)» Финалисты: ▪️Platina Wedding (Платина Веддинг) – проект «MURPH (МЕРФ)», Санкт-Петербург @platina.wedding ▪️SHAFIEVA EVENT AGENCY (ШАФИЕВА ИВЕНТ ЭЖЕНСИ) – проект «Мэхэббэт Любовь Юрату», Казань @di_shafieva ▪️UNIQULTURA (ЮНИКУЛЬТУРА) – проект «Эхо друг друга», Москва (агентство) // Нижний Новгород (проект) @uniqultura Шорт-лист: •Свадебное агентство Марии Ку…
Дорогие участники, в этом году мы начинаем публиковать результаты в номинациях, для которых защита проектов запланирована на 28 апреля. На защиту в Москву приглашаются финалисты, с которыми свяжутся в ближайшие дни. Номинация «ЛУЧШЕЕ РЕГИОНАЛЬНОЕ СВАДЕБНОЕ АГЕНТСТВО» Финалисты: ▪️Darya Drobyazko Wedding & Event (Дарья Дробязко Веддинг и Ивент), Краснодарский край @drobyazkodarya ▪️ID Event Agency (АЙДИ Ивент Эдженс…
Встречайте первую обложку нового номера Wedding апрель-май’26, вдохновленного эстетикой ревущих двадцатых 🦢 Фото: Анна Сапкова Стиль и креатив: Ангелина Белоконь Макияж и прически: Марина Гринь Продюсер: Юлия Воронина Модель: Лена Воищева, агентство ВАЙРАЛ Ассистенты стилиста: Хуршида Мэй, Регина Вавилина Гафер: Никита Мамоченко Видеограф: Тамилла Благодарим за помощь в организации съемки Four Seasons Hotel Moscow.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @wedding_awards_nw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 725,639 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@wedding_magazine_rus · 1,5143 postsGRANATISM
@granatevent · 1162 postsofflcial
@vprojectmodels · 62 postsALLALTAI AGENCY | Свадебное агентство на Алтае
@allaltai · 2031 postDANSIM
@dansim_spb · 81 postبـــــرآے تـــــو [ForYou]
@ForYou · 5961 postБлизость
@kristallinka_muza · 3371 postLIFE в КАIF🦎🪷✨
@maru_kupriyanyuk · 2671 postПространство невест PerfectoWedding 🤍
@perfectowedding · 1251 postSLS
@sashalenkeystudio · 1341 postТруСторис
@tatyanatrus · 1581 postusadbakaliningrad
@usadbakaliningrad · 11 postVerberg_Weddings
@verberg_weddings · 781 postVibes 18+
@vibes · 2,5311 postКанал ВедКонфСПб 29 09 26 WedConfSpb
@wedconfspb · 3951 postEed
@wedding_awards_russia · 181 postСВАДЕБНЫЙ ДОМ | WEDDING HOUSE
@weddinghouse_official · 271 postНапоминашка
@zapomni · 61 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 50
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 50
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@wedding_awards_nw named 50 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wedding Awards Северо-Запад” (@wedding_awards_nw), 1,064 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wedding_awards_nw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.