Channel
@wechatcalls
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,896subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001750748748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wechatcalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wechatcalls |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @btokchina/234824 Jun 2025, 07:42 UTC | @wechatcalls/3546 · this entry24 Jun 2025, 07:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @btokchina/235027 Jun 2025, 06:44 UTC | @wechatcalls/3548 · this entry27 Jun 2025, 06:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @btokchina/235511 Jul 2025, 01:39 UTC | @wechatcalls/3553 · this entry11 Jul 2025, 01:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wechatcalls/3554 · this entry16 Jul 2025, 01:20 UTC | @btokchina/235616 Jul 2025, 01:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wechatcalls/3556 · this entry17 Jul 2025, 07:48 UTC | @btokchina/235817 Jul 2025, 07:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wechatcalls/3557 · this entry18 Jul 2025, 01:30 UTC | @btokchina/235918 Jul 2025, 01:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @btokchina | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @btokchina (10–5) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 June 2025 to 15 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @btokchina. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 1,896 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 1,902 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 1,903 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
20 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2025 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
$Baby Network: Solana Mcap: $1.3m Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/4QbzHS2EcgmvyX77hRexRLvu4Hyy4EeSmWRDR8XSeFqo
❤2
$Xchange Network: Solana Mcap: $360k Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/5d4GVw1BkJ1WgaGxjrBApCxBUoKfyyPBCdkVCvKfMRJs
$Up Network: Solana Mcap: $95k Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/BS1JgwgBWQiA2P3zVBaiSpmvKco3E33y7QwL7VghAWGv
$Nothing 网络: Solana 市值: $1.0百万 这一轮加密周期，我们只需要什么都不做就能变富！ 我们交易得太频繁了。 社区目前情绪高涨，正在积极建设中。 非投资建议，请自行研究。 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/GUXAutvXh2Cvv2avGkbY8CfcsN9v2Uiwr8VCCqpn9HiU
❤5
$Fun 网络：Solana 市值：$404k $Fun 是一个由社区驱动的迷因币，看起来我们现在正在上涨。 社区热情高涨，开发者也在积极建设，很快就会看到它拉升到数百万。 非投资建议，请自行研究。 图表： https://dexscreener.com/solana/EVB1ephSSCWcWvas6dHCtVQQMgSfGLrG3PANq6mgsuYk
❤2
$Memescot 网络：Solana 市值：$256,000 这是Solana生态中所有meme的吉祥物，具备冲上百万市值的巨大潜力。 开发团队和社区都非常活跃，整个氛围非常积极向上。 一如既往，非财务建议，请自行研究（NFA DYOR）。 图表： https://dexscreener.com/solana/6AyAWKQqGYHffV5nJXfX3AfsdtG7ignfbUn93Q4gTLtK
❤3
$Altman 网络：Solana 市值：$510k 在加密圈里，大多数人都是 $Altman，我们不持有任何 $Btc 或 $Eth。 我们希望我们的山寨币创下历史新高。 $Altman 当前交易量非常大，开发团队和社区正在良好地形成和壮大。 一如既往，非财务建议，自行研究。 图表：https://dexscreener.com/solana/FhTkfTRtMWesuTfNSbnCQiZmcX2mCT9izy4zSEPXYf6T
❤4
$Xrp 网络：Solana 市值：$251k $Xrp 代表“极度退休的人”，这是所有加密兄弟梦寐以求的生活方式。 一个有趣又迷人的梗图币，高交易量，社区正在迅速壮大。 预计它的市值将突破百万美元。 一如既往，DYOR，自负盈亏。 图表链接：https://dexscreener.com/solana/2QmNEjz5Jk2XMMf28zpKdt2VNnPxXhqtK3mWBKir5dS1
$Amy 网络：Solana 市值：$103k $Amy 是一个 AI 伴侣，目前处于大幅回调阶段。 交易量高达 800 万，现在市值仅 $103k。 开发团队和社区很可能已经放弃了这个项目。 仅供参考，投资需自行研究（NFA DYOR）。 图表链接： https://dexscreener.com/solana/C7prJW4dY3AcWZ9UXSWHQt5qFA91ML5QkuxC2VaKLNnZ
$Akiko 网络: Solana 市值：$206k $Akiko 是一款基于 Solana 的 AI 伴侣主题新兴 meme 币，目前交易量很高。 项目开发者和社区都非常活跃，正在逐步建立起良好的社群氛围。 一如既往，非投资建议，请自行研究 (NFA DYOR)。 图表链接：https://dexscreener.com/solana/9amxjJCgiGHJ6gfsZUWKpFcfDYUZchzJoGm1qDsZZvAj
$Tao 网络：Solana 市值：$95k 刚上线，$tao 是 Solana 上一只可爱的狗狗币，交易量很高。 社区和开发团队正在快速成型，有望起飞。 一如既往，非财务建议，请自行研究。 图表链接：https://dexscreener.com/solana/Ef3r7kF7afWPiM2Ggcrq4drfmLMUdEvpTBRQpRNQgTaC
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wechatcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 874,352 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wechat Calls (ECA/EARLY) 微信” (@wechatcalls), 1,896 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wechatcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.