6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 268–275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 08:23
274
no change
30 Aug 2026, 20:58
274
+1
23 Aug 2026, 23:57
273
+1
15 Aug 2026, 17:03
272
+3
8 Aug 2026, 09:37
269
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:12
270
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
65.9%
avg views ÷ 274 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
20 (17 July 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
903
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
31
Videos
2
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 55s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
12
35.3%
🤝
9
26.5%
❤
8
23.5%
👍
3
8.82%
👨💻
1
2.94%
🥴
1
2.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @webdevelopment777. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В общем, ребят, касательно данного поста, это не был шоп. Это продукт, который в работе у наших партнеров по разработке, и в скором времени мы сможем представить его вам.
Многим, особенно тем, кто льет фб/гугл и другие сорсы - данный продукт будет очень полезен. Особенно для команд.
Так что мы только начинаем свой рост.
Всем хороших выходных, жарьте шашлык пока погода позволяет)
И кстати в шопе пополнили позиции: …
Всех приветствую! Долгожданный (нет) момент настал. 😨
Наш шоп выходит в демо версию для пользования. Почему демо? - Да банально потому что там сейчас только 3 позиции. Это телеграм аккаунты, инстаграм автореги, и один тик ток с лайв студией по фану (возможно в будущем добавлю еще). Ну и визуальные доработки, хотя на данный момент мне оч нравиться, а такое бывает редко с моей придирчивостью к дизу и коду😁
t.me/leadbo…
Шоп скоро будет! Допиливаем. Так же работаем над обновой мониторинг софта. На данный момент организована сильная структура для мониторинга тысяч чатов, для ключевых запросов. Так же открыты для сотрудничества - если вы к примеру хьюман ресурс агенство по поиску сотрудников, или же в целом нуждаетесь в поиске качественного горячего лида, на индивидуальных условиях - можем обсуждать в личных сообщениях. Таргетированных…
Hello everybody!
В целом - все как всегда, думаешь что сделаешь сейчас все быстренько и все будет тип топ, но приходиться усовершенствовать и допиливать все дольше и дольше)
Не умею держать интригу, потому и покажу вам шоп, который мы делаем для себя и для вас.
Пока что в нем будет только инста, и работаем над тем что бы там были аккаунты таких соц. сетей (В том числе ФАРМЫ):
Фейсбук
Гугл
Телеграм
Онлифанс
Это ка…
Ребят, готовим такую пушку петарду, что сами сидим в трих*е)
Я думаю что выкатим в близжайшее время безальтернативный продукт на рынке😨
Всем хорошей недели.
ЛС - @webdeveloper777
Всем доброе утро!
Вобщем, писал по поводу инсты, вроде как даже - получается регать аккаунты, на данный момент зарегал уже штук 200.
Понятное дело, что некоторые немного живут, некоторые умирают сходу, но в целом можно пробовать что-то интересное)
Если кому вдруг нужен авторег инсты - можете писать, сделаем.
Ну и по техничке ясен пень, работаем далее.
Всем хороешего старта месяца и недели.
ЛС - @webdeveloper777
Есть тут люди которым было бы интересно скупать обьем авторегов инсты? Можем в близжайшее время выкатить свой шоп, с различным пулом гео.
Да60%
Нет53%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
КЕЙС: САЙТ ДЛЯ "ПРОДАЖИ" БИЛЕТОВ НА СПОРТИВНОЕ СОБЫТИЕ🏆
В целом таких кейсов у нас есть штук 5 наверное. Смысла показывать каждый - не вижу, так как морда другая, а концепт один и тот же. Выбор билетов, прыжок на трибуны с выбором места, подтверждение мест, купоны, оплата. Все.
Чем особенен этот кейс? - Да многим) Например логикой выбора трибуны, это было организовано с приложенными усилиями, а главное нужно что бы…
❤4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @webdevelopment777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть тут люди которым было бы интересно скупать обьем авторегов инсты? Можем в близжайшее время выкатить свой шоп, с различным пулом гео.
Да60%
Нет53%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LeadBoost | DEV | Разработка” (@webdevelopment777), 274 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webdevelopment777.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.