Предлагаю пополнить библиотеку треков🙂 Кому не жалко кидайте ответом на этот пост либо сразу треки, либо просто названия Если хотите чтобы я потом это все в один архив собрал ставь клоуна 🤡
🤡17

Channel
@webcrawler_exe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,140subscribers
+352 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002696568338 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @webcrawler_exe |
| Created | 23 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/webcrawler_exe |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 1,140 | -18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 1,158 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 1,156 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 1,152 | +21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:43 | 1,131 | +48 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 1,083 | +80 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 1,003 | +105 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 898 | +110 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 788 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 788 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 20.3% | |
| 🍓 | 20 | 16.9% | |
| 🤡 | 17 | 14.4% | |
| 🍌 | 14 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 7.63% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Предлагаю пополнить библиотеку треков🙂 Кому не жалко кидайте ответом на этот пост либо сразу треки, либо просто названия Если хотите чтобы я потом это все в один архив собрал ставь клоуна 🤡
🤡17
продам шрифт. дорого. как-то мне понадобился шрифт, который выглядел бы рукописным и был сделан супер небрежно в интернетах этих ваших такого я не нашел, поэтому заморочился и сделал свой для той задачи он прекрасно подошел, все прям супер круто вышло и вот лежит он уже год без дела, а мог бы приносить пользу людям (наверное) поэтому теперь я продаю его за пачку чипсов купиц тут после оплаты просто скидываете …
💩3❤1🤓1
Чуваки и чувакессы добрый вечер Сейчас ищу монтажера на свои проекты потому что сам уже не успеваю все делать, да и прикола от монтажа уже не получаю Есть два вопроса которые вызывают трудности у меня Во-первых я не могу много деняг платить, максимум 10-12$ за рилс Но, в свое оправдание могу сказать что видосы там реально без супер монтажа Просто нарезка, бироллы и субтитры (Пример в комментах будет) Во-вторых эт…
💘3
По плану сделать серию видео про шрифтовые пары и про полезные видосы для всех контентмейкеров Что дропать в первую очередь? 🍓 шрифты 🍌 видосы 💩не интересно
🍓19🍌14❤4
Чем занимаетесь?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
есть у меня набор стикеров который мне оч нравится, но к сожалению в своих проектах не где использовать делюсь с вами, может будет полезно https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aqERHcW6ILS4-NXAv4gkwPU60G9dHNe8?usp=sharing
👍2
йопс огромная куча треков для любых видосов собирал долго, поделится не жалко если есть треки которые хотели бы добавить от себя - то кидайте в комменты https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YC4IUAJxxAUMBQYC0gROhAXfeUtHJW1A?usp=sharing
❤15👍12🔥7🍾4
наверное я когда то тоже начну пользоваться аватарами, но пока мне оч нравится сниматься
1/14 история про то как я не воспринимал ии аватары, а потом они стреляли на миллионы просмотров
вознаграждение за старание над видосами
😁4
Послезавтра контракт с Марвел подписываю
👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @webcrawler_exe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чем занимаетесь?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2025 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“webcrawler.exe” (@webcrawler_exe), 1,140 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webcrawler_exe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.