Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,801–1,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 12:59
1,808
-1
5 Oct 2026, 17:36
1,809
-4
28 Sept 2026, 11:55
1,813
+4
18 Sept 2026, 20:56
1,809
-3
14 Sept 2026, 05:55
1,812
-2
10 Sept 2026, 17:18
1,814
-12
6 Sept 2026, 01:38
1,826
-4
1 Sept 2026, 21:13
1,830
-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:57
1,831
-3
27 Aug 2026, 02:17
1,834
-6
24 Aug 2026, 00:43
1,840
-1
20 Aug 2026, 03:46
1,841
-6
16 Aug 2026, 22:13
1,847
+1
13 Aug 2026, 23:48
1,846
-6
10 Aug 2026, 20:17
1,852
-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:32
1,854
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:36
1,854
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
88
70.4%
👍
13
10.4%
🔥
13
10.4%
😁
4
3.20%
👏
3
2.40%
🤯
3
2.40%
🤔
1
0.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
„N-am știut că voi reuși...”
Asta mi-a spus Irina, absolventa cursului nostru de Web Design și mămică aflată în concediu.
Mi-a plăcut această exprimare.
Pentru că este pur omenească.
Cine poate spune cu certitudine:
„Eu voi reuși 100%.”
Cred că foarte puțini.
Până la urmă, nici eu cand am început nu știam dacă voi reuși.
Dar am înțeles un lucru. Rezultatele nu apar din încredere. Rezultatele apar după acțiuni.…
Ori totul, ori nimic.
Când am început cariera de designer, aveam o deviză după care trăiam (și după care acum trăiesc):
Ori totul, ori nimic.
— Nu aveam laptop și nici resurse. Am luat microfinanțare ca să mi-l cumpăr.
— Nu aveam rezultate în primele luni. Din contra, munceam și mai mult. Mă trezeam dimineața la 7 (deși nu aveam un job) și îmi aranjam portofoliul ca să aplic la proiecte.
— Aveam 1-2 clienți pent…
În sfârșit Figma schimbă logica de organizare a fișierelor.
În trecut era Team —> Projects —> Fișierele de lucru
Acum este Team —> Folder —> Fișiere
Și nu doar denumirea e schimbată, dar și logica de lucru.
Acum putem crea mai multe foldere în cadrul aceluiași Team și până la 10 folders cuibărite.
De ex:
Team Numele Tau
|_Folder “Project X”
|_ Folder “Website” —> fișiere
|_ Folder “Branding” —> fișiere
Ș…
Bootcampul — 21 zile de design, a luat sfârșit.
Am primit plăcere să fiu în meet-uri cu persoane înțelepte care au venit cu scop clar la instruirea cu mine.
Au primit feedback, au dat întrebări, au învățat Webflow.
E a doua serie anuală de Bootcamp, cu lecții live.
Ce a fost diferit la acesta față de anul trecut?
Ultima lecție — dezvoltare cu Claude Code a designurilor din Figma.
— Am vorbit la această lecție d…
Cum te poziționezi tu?
Am văzut recent o postare unde cineva se numește “AI Web Designer”
Cum îți sună?
În continuare îți voi spune de ce este o poziționare și strategie greșită.
Noi doar nu ne numim “Figma Designer” sau “Photoshop Designer”?
AI este instrumentul. Noi nu ne identificăm după un singur tool.
Din alt punct de vedere, scriind asta despre tine, automat îți scazi din valoarea ta.
Adică “persoana ast…
Primul atac cibernetic de AI.
Mă gândesc: Cum va arăta lumea peste 10 ani? Dar 50?
Fiindcă, corporațiile de AI construiesc creaturi, ceva ce nu poate avea o formă fizică comparată.
(probabil o pot compara doar cu creatura extraterestrială din Venom)
Suntem la o etapă prematură de dezvoltare a acestor tehnologii și nimeni nu poate spune cu certitudine despre riscurile reale ce pot apărea în viitor.
Mai pe scurt..…
Opaaa
Ceva util sper, că erau certați Claude x Webflow până acum...
Poate actualizarea dată „îi împacă”.
Și nice că acum, în timp ce decurge Bootcampul UI/UX — 21 zile de design, putem LIVE, în meet să testăm noile updates și să decidem dacă le folosim la proiecte :)
Clienții tăi vor asta.
Sincer, dacă lucrezi cu antreprenori/fondatori — ei țin mult la brandul lor.
Dacă ai logo mark, sau logoul în sine permite anumite manevrări vizuale — de ce să nu o faci?
Important, evident, fără overbranding.
Iată astfel am făcut la clientul meu, și... + animație de rotire a imaginii la scroll, va arăta ca un 3D element (chiar dacă este un PNG)
Simplu, rapid... cu AI
Iată cum identificăm noi că absolvenții au succes după cursul de 5 luni.
Revin ei la noi sau revenim noi la ei ⚡️
Important că au succes și reușesc să facă 💵 din design...
Dacă nu ar fi asta... nimic nu ar avea sens 😀
Veniți și voi la instruire, va fi vesel, curând începe al 38-lea flux Webcase :)
S-au terminat timpurile de Copy Paste la texte
Omg... cât de comod este asta, le-ai scris și corectat direct în AI și acesta automat le schimbă în Figma.
Viața designerilor nu va mai fi la fel 🙌
❤7🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @webcasedesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sergiu Vasiliev & Webcase” (@webcasedesign), 1,808 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webcasedesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.