3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 884–891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:17
890
+5
7 Aug 2026, 10:42
885
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:03
885
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
180.9%
avg views ÷ 890 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.352%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
18 (18 April 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
4,830
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
91 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
79
86.8%
🔥
9
9.89%
👌
1
1.10%
💯
1
1.10%
😁
1
1.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The smartest thing you can do when it comes to webcam is to improve the model’s chatting in order to find loyal customers that send her money on the side, on top of what they spend on the websites
There’s models who received hundreds of thousands of dollars this say
Learn: www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
Dm @joelampton for details
If you're working a job right now / run online businesses that didn't make you rich / you're broke
You should start saving some cash and get into WEBCAM PROFITS
I get asked questions about this in the DM's so i'll break down exactly what you need to do to make it work:
1. Have 1-1.5k on the side
2. Get into WEBCAM PROFITS then watch all the videos/read all the conversations / ask questions / become friends with ot…
We produced hundreds of people making money with their webcam companies in the last 14 months since we launched WEBCAM PROFITS
We currently have the strongest / biggest webcam community in the world
By joining the program you get:
1. Community with hundreds of people who run webcam agencies / webcam models
2. Complete course that explains everything you need to know from A to Z about the business
3. Access to al…
Webcam is the most viable way to get rich I’m 2026
Hundreds of dollars per say with every model FROM THE BEGGINING - if you do things right
Details @joelampton
www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
You can start making money from the first hours your model spends online. Hundreds or dollars from the beginning.
As oppose to OnlyFans or other businesses where it takes a lot of time until u see some results, on webcam you can start earning immediately
Dm @joelampton for details
You gotta get rich first - all other aspects don’t matter unless u have money
U need a real business, systems, the right approach, a strategy
Inside WEBCAM PROFITS we teach you everything you need to know from A to Z
Dm @joelampton for details
Also check: www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
If you learn how to run webcam models it’s life changing money that allows you to do whatever the fuck u want
Even if u manage one model you make good money, now imagine AN AGENCY with multiple models
Dm @joelampton for details
Also check www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
You can get rich as fuck if you follow our system
Receipts over receipts for 1 year straight since we started the program
Dm for details @joelampton
www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
Join the winning team G. Time to get rich.
You get 4-5 models fast, each make over 1k per day, that’s 50k per month
Enough to sponsor a good lifestyle + money to invest in order to grow
Stop being an idiot
www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
Dm @joelampton for details
Btw you don’t have to work with 10 out of 10 models
You can start with some “frogs” then invest into ads to get better models
It’s all a numbers game. If u manage to hire enough models you make a lot of money with no significant stress
Dm for details @joelampton
Also check: www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
One of our students who started 2 months ago already makes between 800 and 1200 in PROFIT every day
You can make thousands per day if you follow the correct system
And you don’t need to “know girls” or even interact with them in real life
Everything can be done remotely
DM @joelampton for details
Learn: www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
Join the winning team:
www.joelampton.net/webcam-profits
Dm @joelampton for details
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @webcamprofits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 33,986 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WEBCAM PROFITS ( FREE CHANNEL )” (@webcamprofits), 890 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webcamprofits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.