Channel
@web_dev_bds
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,291subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001936591168 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @web_dev_bds |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/web_dev_bds |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 4,291 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 4,284 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 4,290 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 4,290 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,856 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
23 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 52.2% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 17.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎨 Refero Styles Refero Styles is a curated library of over 2,000 design systems extracted from real-world websites and packaged as structured DESIGN.md files for AI coding agents. Instead of a generic UI gallery for human designers, the platform is specifically engineered to give AI tools (like Cursor, Claude Code, v0, Bolt, and Lovable) the precise visual guidelines and "design taste" they typically lack. 🔗 https…
❤1👍1
🧠 20 GitHub Repos That Expose What Tutorials Never Taught You You can build a to-do app in five frameworks and still not know how a database index works. These repos close that gap. 1. computer-science A full self-taught CS degree curriculum, for anyone who skipped college or forgot what they learned. 2. the-book-of-secret-knowledge A huge stash of tools, tricks, and one-liners that experienced devs pick up over y…
❤1
Worm Compromises Over 1,300 npm Packages Including Popular Caching Tools A self-spreading worm called ChainDrop has compromised more than 1,300 npm packages, including popular ones like Keyv, Cacheable, and flat-cache. The packages together have around 2 billion monthly downloads. The attack started after a maintainer’s GitHub account was compromised. The malware steals credentials and spreads by publishing new mal…
👍2
File, posted without a caption
📘 The Little ASP.NET Core Book ✍️ Authors: Nate Barbettini 🔗 Read Online #ASP.NET ──────────────────── 👉 @free_programming_books_bds 👈
❤1
Which practice helps developers detect integration issues before deploying to production?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Common Network Ports Every DevOps Engineer Should Know
❤3
npm or npx? The two commands differ by one letter. Their jobs couldn't be more different. 👉 npm installs packages into your project. 👉 npx downloads a package, runs it, and removes it afterward unless it's already available. That's why you'll see this: npx create-vite@latest instead of: npm install create-vite You're only using create-vite once to generate a project. Keeping it installed afterward serves no purpo…
❤3
File, posted without a caption
👍2
Which CSS feature supports responsive design?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
15 GitHub Repositories Every Developer Should Know
🔥4
Next.js 16 Streaming Cache Fixes
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @web_dev_bds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which practice helps developers detect integration issues before deploying to production?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which CSS feature supports responsive design?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Why is using the same password across multiple sites risky?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Web Development” (@web_dev_bds), 4,291 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web_dev_bds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.