Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BlockChainWORLD.ai - daily crypto and AI news and promos!

Channel

BlockChainWORLD.ai - daily crypto and AI news and promos!

@web3worldchannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44,947subscribers

-4,850 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001136552964
TypeChannel
Username@web3worldchannel
DescriptionBlockChainWORLD.ai - Web3World & Blockchain & Infinite Digital daily crypto and AI news and promos! Vortex & Crypto Bros official channel ⚡️ Reach for promos [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/web3worldchannel

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

44,94749,79747,3726 August 2026 — 49,797 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,667 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,409 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,149 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,753 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,503 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,305 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,066 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,860 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,630 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,307 subscribers17 August 2026 — 47,025 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46,909 subscribers19 August 2026 — 46,580 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,305 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46,139 subscribers22 August 2026 — 45,793 subscribers24 August 2026 — 45,492 subscribers25 August 2026 — 45,276 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,097 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,947 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net -4,850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,220–50,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 02:4844,947-150
26 Aug 2026, 05:4945,097-179
25 Aug 2026, 08:0345,276-216
24 Aug 2026, 09:1445,492-301
22 Aug 2026, 13:5645,793-346
21 Aug 2026, 06:3346,139-166
20 Aug 2026, 09:0546,305-275
19 Aug 2026, 12:1346,580-329
18 Aug 2026, 10:4746,909-116
17 Aug 2026, 12:5647,025-282
16 Aug 2026, 06:1447,307-323
14 Aug 2026, 17:4547,630-230
13 Aug 2026, 10:2747,860-206
12 Aug 2026, 07:2748,066-239
11 Aug 2026, 09:0248,305-198
10 Aug 2026, 10:0148,503-250
9 Aug 2026, 10:0148,753-396
8 Aug 2026, 12:4749,149-260
7 Aug 2026, 15:4149,409-258
6 Aug 2026, 16:0049,667first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.9%
avg views ÷ 44,947 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,700
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held23 (27 May 202624 August 2026)
Views total172,800
Reactions total4,958
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,350
Videos
94
Links
180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 34s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,160 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,84827.2%
🎉3,48624.6%
3,47224.5%
🔥3,35423.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,921reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC≈18,500 views640 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

🤑 In 2019 and 2023, a sharp BTC breakout above the 200 WMA signaled that the market bottom was already far behind. We’re seeing a similar pump now, but based on cycle timing, it has come too early. This rally badly needs continued buying support, and institutions are providing it — Bitcoin ETFs attracted $1.9 billion in inflows last week, marking their best result since November 2025.

165👍165🎉158🔥152

19 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC≈22,800 views418 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

$1.7 billion worth of short positions were liquidated over the past 4 hours — the second-largest short squeeze in crypto history 🎓 📈 BTC is already above $68K, while the total crypto market capitalization has surged by $160 billion. The move was triggered by the U.S. Treasury’s announcement that it would increase the pace of bond buybacks, which could be seen as a signal of more liquidity entering the market.

118🎉105👍105🔥90

15 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC≈24,300 views970 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

🕯 BTC fell below $63K yesterday at the opening of the U.S. trading session. For three days in a row, we’ve seen Bitcoin dump at the U.S. open and then recover afterward. People on X are already trying to identify the mysterious U.S.-based manipulator. 💵 The stock market is gaining momentum. Memory manufacturers continued their recovery yesterday: Micron +4%, SanDisk +13%, Seagate +5%, and Western Digital +7%. Now, 7

🎉258👍246🔥235231

12 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC≈29,200 views828 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

BTC is squeezed between key levels: major sellers are sitting around $65,500–$66,000, while buyers are concentrated near $64,400–$64,600 🕯 Looking at liquidations, the biggest clusters are shorts at $65,800–$66,000 and longs at $64,450–$64,650. For now, the downside looks more likely to be tested first: there’s a heavy sell wall above, while the potential long-liquidation zone below may be more attractive for the ma

🎉225🔥213197👍193

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈28,900 views968 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

Every Bitcoin bull market has begun alongside an expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet and growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector (ISM PMI) 🤑 Right now, the Fed is effectively conducting hidden QE to support the bond market, while the ISM PMI rose to 55.6 in July. 💬 This doesn’t mean Bitcoin is going to the moon tomorrow. In our view, late summer and early autumn could still be challenging for the crypto market. Bu

🔥267253🎉241👍207

3 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC≈20,200 views865 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

AI revenues aren’t growing fast enough to justify the level of investment 💸 The Economist estimates that, at the current pace of AI investment, the industry would need to generate $2.5 trillion in annual revenue to break even. That is more than the combined revenue of the entire technology sector. At the moment, the combined AI-related revenue of Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, SpaceX, and Meta is approximate

224🔥224👍210🎉207

30 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC≈28,900 views269 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Try New RIFTFALL Demo! Sixty minutes. No level locks, no "first three maps then buy it." The whole game is unlocked — twenty arenas, six weapons, every boss that wants you dead. The only thing counting down is you. Grab the Breacher. Grab the Vulcan, the Arc Rail, the Flamer. Kill a dragon. Kill a tripod the size of a cathedral. Ride a train. Get eaten by something in the dark and try again, faster. When the clock

👍7572🔥62🎉60

28 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈21,000 views849 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

BTC at $400k? New prediction from Crypto Twitter 🍴 Crypto Twitter is once again hyping an ultra-bullish take, claiming that Bitcoin is currently in the "Buy Zone" and that another 6–12 months of a massive bull run lie ahead. Influencers are predicting a new market cycle that could eventually send BTC to $400k in the long term. The chart being shared is compared to the accumulation zones seen at the bottoms of the 201

👍230🎉221213🔥185

24 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈24,700 views574 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

Bitcoin has never fallen below its Balanced Price level. Right now, that level sits at $38,382 🕯 Ready to go all in if the price drops below $40K? 👍

🎉155144👍144🔥131

19 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC≈30,000 views2,052 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

There’s a growing narrative on Twitter that Bitcoin hasn’t reached its bottom yet because, historically, it has dropped 70–80% from its cycle highs. There are tons of posts and charts making this argument. Every cycle reaches a peak and then gives back most of its gains. → 2017 peak: $19,000 → 84% decline → 2021 peak: $69,000 → 77% decline → 2025 peak: $126,000 → 51% maximum drawdown so far

🔥523515🎉512👍502

17 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC≈20,400 views397 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

This month is on track to record the lowest level of venture capital investment in the crypto industry since 2020. But for the industry, that’s arguably a positive development: 🟠 Weak projects with no real product are being filtered out, freeing up capital and talent for stronger, technology-driven teams. 🟠 Historically, every major downturn in venture funding has been followed by a significant wave of technologica

🔥101100🎉100👍96

11 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈25,800 views307 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is setting new records… for the longest time spent below previous highs 💀 BTC has now spent 850 days in its history trading below its current all-time high — an all-time record. Historically, Bitcoin tends to find its bottom after around 660+ days.

👍9280🎉70🔥65

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @web3worldchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 278,783 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlockChainWORLD.ai - daily crypto and AI news and promos!” (@web3worldchannel), 44,947 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3worldchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.