Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Web3 Decision Announcement 📣

Channel

Web3 Decision Announcement 📣

@web3decision_announcement

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4,168subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002249380459
TypeChannel
Username@web3decision_announcement
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/web3decision_announcement

Growth

4,1684,2104,1897 August 2026 — 4,210 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,209 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,195 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,168 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,162–4,216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:344,168-27
11 Aug 2026, 05:154,195-14
7 Aug 2026, 19:084,209-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:324,210first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍822.2%
719.4%
👏719.4%
🤝411.1%
👌25.56%
🔥25.56%
😍25.56%
🙏25.56%
💯12.78%
😘12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2026, 19:11 UTC994 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/web3decision/status/2036158691389612066

👏3

11 Mar 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,180 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/web3decision/status/2031700079958987153?s=46

2 Mar 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,030 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Smart AI Version 2 Performance Report 📈 V1 to V2 Improvements ✅ +50.3% Subjective Reasoning ✅ +49.7% Informativeness ✅ +7.3% Truthfulness 🏆 Benchmark Results ✅ 51.8% Hallucination Control (Best in Class) ✅ 72.9% Subjective Evaluation (Top Tier) ✅ 100% Knowledge Accuracy (Smart AI DA V2) Precision. Reliability. Performance. #AI #Web3D #MachineLearning #TechInnovation

👍3😍1😘1

21 Feb 2026, 15:24 UTC623 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/web3decision/status/2025229933203562604?s=20

20 Feb 2026, 16:47 UTC508 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅Ancak burada bir geri çekilme yoktur✅ Bu bir geri adım değil; stratejik bir konumlanma ve olgunlaşma sürecidir. Web3Decision kısa vadeli fiyat hareketlerine odaklanan bir yapı değildir. Bizim odağımız; veri, doğruluk ve karar kalitesi üreten yapay zeka altyapısıdır. --- 🔎 CEX “Kan Emiciliği” Döngüsünün Sonu Merkezi borsalar (CEX) kısa vadede hacim ve görünürlük sağlayabilir. Ancak özellikle düşük ve orta ölçe

🤝4👌21💯1

20 Feb 2026, 15:52 UTC315 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 Web3Decision Özelinde: Yaşananlar, Görmezden Gelinenler ve Artık Netleşen Gerçekler Bazı şeyleri artık direk konuşmak gerekiyor aksi halde meydan asimetrik kan emicilere kalıyor. Son 9 ayda Web3Decision’ın yaşadıkları, yalnızca bir token fiyat hareketi değildir. Bu, kripto ekosistemindeki yapısal çarpıklıkların sahadaki karşılığıdır. Öncelikle: Coinstore Asya pazarına Web3D yi açma sözünü tutmadığı gibi Avrupa

1

17 Feb 2026, 13:59 UTC336 viewsread 8 August 2026

Blockchain Scaling: Are we building utility or a global casino? 🎰 We promised decentralized freedom. In 2025, the data suggests we’ve built the world’s most efficient, frictionless gambling machine. As blockchain scaling reaches technical perfection, the "On-Chain Casino" model has taken over. Here is the reality of the 2025 crypto landscape: ⚡ The Scaling Paradox Scaling was meant for utility, but it has perfecte

13 Feb 2026, 19:26 UTC497 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/web3decision/status/2022033518474539348?s=46

13 Feb 2026, 19:26 UTC477 viewsread 8 August 2026

No More Crypto Paid Marketing on X. Web3 Decision again right! According to X’s official Paid Partnerships Policy, financial products — including crypto — are now listed under prohibited industries, alongside gambling, casinos, drugs, and other restricted categories. Source: https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/paid-partnerships-policy If you look carefully, crypto is no longer positioned as an innovation sec

12 Feb 2026, 20:24 UTC389 viewsread 8 August 2026

Why Is Capital Not Flowing Into Spot Altcoins? The absence of capital inflow into spot altcoins is not accidental. It is structural. Over the past year, liquidity has gradually shifted away from long-term ecosystem development and toward short-term speculative mechanisms. Platforms like Polymarket, token launch environments such as Pump.fun, and the normalization of high-leverage trading have reshaped capital behav

12 Feb 2026, 05:01 UTC361 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Crypto Market View (Last 10 Months) 📊 According to the latest Token Metrics Pulse market data, prediction markets were the only crypto segment showing positive performance over the past week, even as major sectors like DeFi, smart-contract platforms, gaming, and DePIN saw declines. Prediction markets were up ~5.4% while the rest of the market was red. This is a telling signal: the only area attracting capital and g

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @web3decision_announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,073 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Web3 Decision Announcement 📣” (@web3decision_announcement), 4,168 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3decision_announcement.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.