4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,691–9,754 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 11:06
9,747
+23
7 Aug 2026, 20:31
9,724
+26
7 Aug 2026, 00:45
9,698
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:33
9,698
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 9,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
24 (18 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
31,223
Reactions total
434
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,270
Videos
≈61
Links
≈1,520
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
434 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🐳
109
25.1%
🔥
108
24.9%
❤
65
15.0%
🤡
40
9.22%
👍
36
8.29%
🍌
34
7.83%
🫡
25
5.76%
🤔
14
3.23%
🙈
3
0.691%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 434reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @web3capta1n. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🦜 Забираем NFT от Base
Сегодня в честь трёхлетия они выпустили «Base 3rd Birthday NFT». Возможно, NFT даст какие-то преимущества при том же дропе или со временем подорожает, и мы сможем на этом заработать
GUIDE:
🔹Клеймим здесь (Цена: 0.09$)
🦜Captain's move:
Обязательно не ленимся и забираем. Цена смешная, но, опять же, никто не знает, что с ней будет далее: возможно, она станет важной деталью под дроп, а может, и …
🦜Забираем 17-116$ от Binance
Недавно вышла хорошая акция на бинанс, где можем получить от 17 до 116$ на полном пассиве
GUIDE:
🔹Регистрируемся на Binance
🔹Подтверждаем участие (Завтра начало)
🔹Берем заем USDT, USDC или ACE на 21 день
🔹Подписываем средние значение за это время и ждем дедлайн
🔹Минимальный заем 201$
🦜Captain's move:
Как вариант, чтобы сэкономить, можем пользоваться стейкингом. Всего будет 1220 мест: 1…
🦜Vangrid - Претендуем на дроп и делим 100к$ призового пула
Vangrid - это платформа DePIN для ИИ. Собрали $9М от tier-1,2 фондов
Сейчас у них проходит так называем Testnet с confirmed дропом. А также есть программа наград с пулом 100.000$
GUIDE:
🔹Регистрируемся на сайте, и следуем инструкции
🔹Начинаем снимать различные видео, тем самым зарабатывая очки
🔹Выполняем все задания на сайте (Пул: 100к$)
🦜Captain's move:
…
🦜 Выносим 150$/реферал от Kalshi & Kaito
Недавно они запустили ивент, в котором у нас будет возможность получить 150$ за каждого реферала из США.
Хорошая возможность залутать капусты, поэтому давайте смотреть что предлагают
Детали:
🔹Главное требование - вам и вашим рефералам нужен KYC (USA)
🔹После этого ваш рефералам должен прогнать 50$ на Kalshi Perps
🔹Конец ивента: 6 ноября
🦜Captain's move:
Уверен, будет нелегк…
🦜 ASAP! Оформляем себе Gemini Pro за 0.2$/месяц
Для тех кто не знал, сейчас в Taynikstore можно приобрести себе подписку Gemini Pro на 18 месяцев всего за 3.7$ (0.2$/мес)
Я даже взял маме и брату, т.к. это супердешево. А что? Сейчас все хотят иметь быстрый доступ к информационному полю без вечных запросов в Google, а тут еще и Pro-версия по цене чашки кофе
Покупаем по лучшим ценам здесь:
@Taynikstore.bot
@Taynikst…
🦜Срочно забираем домен от Cloudflare
Сейчас они запускают новую платную систему Cloudflare.Pay, где мы можем ранние юзеры забрать желаемый домен, чтобы в будущем по иметь какую-то выгоду
GUIDE:
🔹Забираем домен здесь
🦜Captain's move:
Как минимум у нас будет доступ к будущем апдейтам проекта, а как максимум получится залутать какую-то копейку в виде вечнозеленых, с той же продажи домена. Тема полезная, поэтому не ск…
🦜Забираем WL на сейл от STRIP | Важные апдейты
Недавно отрабатывали с вами Testnet от StripChain, сейчас же они открыли доступ к вайтлисту на паблик-сейл токена STRIP
Главная особенность в том, что StripChain отказались от обычных токенсейлов, где после TGE большинство сразу продает токены. Вместо этого используется формат ITTC, в котором есть минимальный порог цены для защиты от сильного дампа, а цена и разблокиро…
🦜Обучаем роботов и забираем дроп от Axis
Axis Robots - это ИИ проект, который собираем данные и обучает на них роботов. Сборы $12М от 10k Ventures, Hack VC и др.
Сейчас проект находится в бета, в который мы можем залететь как Early User и претендовать на AirDrop
GUIDE:
🔹Подключаем кошелек на сайте
🔹В разделе «Hub» выполняем задания
🔹Затем клеймим бэйджи которые падают нам дв выполненные задания
🦜Captain's move:
П…
🦜Pond AI - выжимаем все соки под AirDrop
Pond AI - новая web3 платформа для создания и заработка на ИИ моделях. Собрано $7.5М от Delphi Ventures, CoinBase и др.
Сейчас у них проходит компания по фарму поинтов, с вероятностью 99% поинты будут конвертированы в токены проекта при дропе
GUIDE:
🔹Регистрируемся на сайте
🔹В разделе «Points» выполняем все доступные задания
🔹Во вкладке Tasks выполняем более сложные задания…
🦜 Взял себе ChatGPT Plus и получил в подарок Gemini Pro 18 мес
Короче, случайно нашел новый сервис, где можно приобрести различные AI-подписки по низким ценам
Взял себе ChatGPT Plus за $12, и, как оказалось, сейчас они дают в подарок Gemini Pro на 18 месяцев (действует на все подписки, кроме самого Gemini) + по промо FREE20 забирайте 20 руб на балик
@taynikstore_bot
В общем, кто искал Claude, ChatGPT Plus и други…
🦜Делим пул $1М от Bonk | Наконец-то «поднимем» вечнозеленые
В свое время проект навел много суеты. Сейчас они запустили лист ожидания, и все, кто зарегистрируется, смогут претендовать на часть призового пула в $1 млн
GUIDE:
🔹Регистрируемся здесь
🦜Captain's move:
Я по фану загоню 10 аккаунтов. Вложений, по сути, никаких нет, так что, может, получится залутать пару десятков долларов. Лоубанкам особенно не советую ск…
🦜WorkHub - крупное обновления, новые фичи для заказчиков и исполнителей
Писал пост про WorkHub, сейчас же вышло крупное обновление, в котором завезли много новых плюшек как для заказчиков, так и для исполнителей. Давайте разбираться!
Для заказчиков:
🔹Теперь все стало гораздо проще, при создании заказа вы можете ставить свои желаемые настройки и условия, контролировать процесс выполнения задания, добавлять слоты и п…
🐳6🔥6🫡5🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @web3capta1n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@web3capta1n edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 119,890 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@web3capta1n named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@taynikstore named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Web 3.0 Captain🦜YouTube” (@web3capta1n), 9,747 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3capta1n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.