Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Web3_Antivirus

Channel

Web3_Antivirus

@web3_antivirus_io

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

148subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003733019330
TypeChannel
Username@web3_antivirus_io
DescriptionReal-time Web3 security stack. API & free extension for token validation, transaction filtering and address screening. Trusted by industry leaders.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 4 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/web3_antivirus_io

Growth

1487 Aug 2026, 19:33 — 148 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 20:31 — 148 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:338 Aug 2026, 20:31
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:31148no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:33148first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Videos
6
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍562.5%
337.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 08:49 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cointelegraphPhoto

Scam contracts are appearing at massive scale. According to @web3_antivirus_io, 100.8M contracts have already been analyzed. 4.24M were flagged as scam contracts, including 3.41M found in the last 30 days. A malicious contract can look ordinary until a user approves, signs or connects a wallet. Check wallet risk, contract activity, approvals, toxic scores and suspicious addresses. 👉 https://dash.web3antivirus.io

1👍1

24 Jun 2026, 08:03 UTC203 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We’ve detected a wallet draining transaction that moved 103,933 USDT from one victim in a single transfer. The assets then moved through tunneling addresses and appear to have paused at an address that Web3 Antivirus already scores 100/100 toxic as a scam participant 🎯 You can check wallet risk, toxic scores, approvals, suspicious activity and transaction history in the Web3 Antivirus Dashboard!

👍1

15 Jun 2026, 07:12 UTC217 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cointelegraphPhoto

🚨 MASSIVE: One signature can be enough to lose a wallet. After a recent 316K $USDC wallet drainer case, @web3_antivirus_io is reminding users to stick to the basics before signing. Scan contracts, verify links, read approvals, revoke old permissions, and keep most assets away from your dApp wallet. Check wallet activity, approvals, and risk exposure 👉 dash.web3antivirus.io News | Markets | YouTube

13 Jun 2026, 08:03 UTC193 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔺 Sometimes the approval was signed days or weeks earlier, then quietly waits until the wallet receives more funds. Take a min to review old approvals, forgotten permissions can stay dormant for a long time before they become a problem.

👍1

12 Jun 2026, 07:58 UTC182 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Scams still reach users through channels like email, texts, social media and ads. ✔ Before you sign, swap or approve anything, check the wallet, address and risk exposure first

8 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Address poisoning can make wallet history lie. We broke down a real case for @Cointelegraph where a fake lookalike transaction appeared before the user’s real 10 USDT test transfer. The user followed the usual safety step, but recent activity still became misleading. @Web3_Antivirus_io helps detect poisoning attempts, scam addresses and risky approvals before you send or sign. 📄 Read the article on Cointelegraph

5 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC157 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

May showed how risky activity can blend into regular MetaMask flows. Across the monitored address, scam-related movement reached $737K outbound and $748K inbound, with 364 transactions each way. Bot activity added $156K outbound and $171K inbound, while sanctions exposure reached $2.7K outbound and $2.8K inbound. Check addresses and transaction history before you sign, swap or approve ☑️

👍1

4 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC148 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cointelegraphPhoto

A wallet drainer hit a 2 month old wallet for 316K USDC. According to @web3_antivirus_io, the wallet was mostly used for DEX swaps before the drain. The stolen USDC was quickly swapped into ETH through 2 txs worth around $47K and $268K. Check wallet activity, approvals and risk exposure dash.web3antivirus.io News | Markets | YouTube

1 Jun 2026, 20:44 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cointelegraphPhoto

🚨 INSIGHT: Some wallets look clean until their history says otherwise. @web3_antivirus_io helps reveal what is behind the address. See toxic score, wallet health, approvals, transactions and alerts without requiring a wallet connection 🌐 News | Markets | YouTube

28 May 2026, 14:28 UTC310 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

The victim lost 51,8K USDC after signing a high risk interaction. Approvals need to be checked before they turn into losses. Web3 Antivirus Dashboard shows risky transactions, suspicious approvals and wallet exposure in one place, so you can see what happened and what may still be dangerous!

1

25 May 2026, 07:27 UTC245 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cointelegraphPhoto

Check wallet risk before you interact! With @web3_antivirus_io, you can scan any Ethereum address, contract or ENS name to see its Toxic Score, wallet health, approvals, airdrops and risky activity. Just paste the address and check the risk 💪 News | Markets | YouTube

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @web3_antivirus_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Web3_Antivirus” (@web3_antivirus_io), 148 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3_antivirus_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.