9 measurements spanning 22 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,127–1,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 11:17
1,178
-2
26 Aug 2026, 17:18
1,180
+23
23 Aug 2026, 09:38
1,157
+23
20 Aug 2026, 01:41
1,134
-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:22
1,137
-5
13 Aug 2026, 12:27
1,142
-4
10 Aug 2026, 15:02
1,146
-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:47
1,148
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:36
1,148
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 1,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
19 (10 May 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
187
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
207 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
119
57.5%
👍
35
16.9%
🔥
28
13.5%
👏
6
2.90%
😁
5
2.42%
💅
2
0.966%
💩
2
0.966%
😎
2
0.966%
🍌
1
0.483%
🍓
1
0.483%
🍾
1
0.483%
👀
1
0.483%
👎
1
0.483%
👾
1
0.483%
😭
1
0.483%
🙈
1
0.483%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We're getting very close to the final phase of this bear market.
This is where you want to start accumulating Bitcoin and select altcoins.
Start buying on a weekly basis, stay patient, and focus on the long term.
Your future self will thank you.
Trading NQ without the BS is finally possible.
NASDAQ live on Breakout
• 5x leverage
• $1M position size
• No min trading days
• Static DD + unlimited on-demand payouts
Next 24h only → code WM = 24% OFF
https://www.breakoutprop.com/join/wm/
It has been a while since my last update here.
The summer market conditions continue, with Bitcoin trading in the $60,000–$67,000 range and overall price action remaining relatively slow. As many traders know, summer periods typically provide fewer high-probability setups.
Yesterday, I shared a Bitcoin short idea on X, while members of the private group received the complete trade plan, including the entry, stop-lo…
Hi all,
Michael Saylor’s intervention on Monday to raise additional funds for dividend payments and to temporarily slow down further Bitcoin purchases has, for now, taken the “black swan” edge out of this event. However, I expect this to be temporary and that it may resurface later on.
For now, as fear in the market starts to ease, Bitcoin and the broader crypto market could be heading into a short-term relief phas…
Warning: I think we could see a big capitulation soon for Bitcoin due to Michael Saylor’s company strategy of holding too much Bitcoin on the balance sheet (on depth). Bitcoin dominance is falling off a cliff, and the STRC token is also falling off a cliff. I don’t know all the details, but this is extremely alarming to me.
Also, the dividend he’s paying, which is around 12%, doesn’t look sustainable. Whenever you s…
Another winning short trade on Bitcoin.
I share all my trades/spot buys and more in the private Telegram group:
Here’s how to join:
1️⃣ Create an account on BloFin or Bitunix
2️⃣ Send me your BloFin/Bitunix UID on Telegram: @wealthmanagerr
3️⃣ Get added to the private group and start copying trades
Register here 👇
Bitunix:
https://www.bitunix.com/register?vipCode=QVzW
BloFin:
https://partner.blofin.com/d/Wealth…
I could’ve picked any prop firm. I chose this one for a reason.
https://www.breakoutprop.com is backed by Kraken, with $50 M+ paid out to traders, no consistency rules, and on-demand payouts.
For a lot of traders, capital is the real barrier, not skill. That’s where prop firms change the game.
Cheaper accounts, faster scaling, and more flexibility to actually grow.
If you’re getting funded, use code WM for the m…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wealthmangerr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wealth Manager” (@wealthmangerr), 1,178 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wealthmangerr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.